Literature DB >> 24149363

Effects of distance specialization on the backstroke swimming kinematics.

Matteo Cortesi1, Silvia Fantozzi, Giorgio Gatta.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate different biomechanical variables of backstroke technique in swimmers specialized in different distance events, in order to investigate the capacity to modify the timing of the arm stroke when changing the swimming velocity from sub-maximal to maximal. Two 25-m backstroke trials respectively at 70% of maximum velocity (V70) and at 100% of maximum velocity (Vmax) were performed by 9 200-m distance swimmers and 9 50-m distance swimmers. Swimming velocity, stroke length, stroke rate, duration of different phases of the arm stroke and selected kinematic variables were assessed in both cases. In the 50-m distance swimmers, the duration of the propulsive phase at Vmax, expressed as a percentage of the duration of the total underwater arm stroke, increased significantly (p = 0.001) with increasing swimming velocity. Specifically, both the pull and push phases were fundamental in the increase of duration of the propulsive phase. When compared to 200-m specialists, 50-m distance swimmers seem to be more able to modify their arm stroke phases duration when increasing the swimming velocity in backstroke. Key pointsThe 50-m DS are able to find an optimal timing among the stroke phases increasing the duration of the propulsive phase.The 50-m DS, when increasing the swimming velocity, show a more efficient relationship between propulsive and non propulsive phases with respect to the 200-m DS.Both pull and push phases are key factors for increasing the duration of the propulsive phase for the 50-m DS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arm motion; stroke length; stroke phases; stroke rate; technical analysis

Year:  2012        PMID: 24149363      PMCID: PMC3737928     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  18 in total

1.  A new index of coordination for the crawl: description and usefulness.

Authors:  D Chollet; S Chalies; J C Chatard
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.118

2.  Adults have lower stroke rate during submaximal front crawl swimming than children.

Authors:  Per-Ludvik Kjendlie; Robert Keig Stallman; James Stray-Gundersen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Analysis of stroke organization in the backstroke as a function of skill.

Authors:  Robert Lerda; Chantal Cardelli
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Energetics of backstroke swimming in males and females.

Authors:  P P Klentrou; R R Montpetit
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Kinematic differences between front crawl sprint and distance swimmers at a distance pace.

Authors:  Carla B McCabe; Ross H Sanders
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 3.337

6.  Swim specialty affects energy cost and motor organization.

Authors:  L Seifert; J Komar; P M Leprêtre; F Lemaitre; F Chavallard; M Alberty; N Houel; C Hausswirth; D Chollet; P Hellard
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 3.118

7.  Kinematic differences between front crawl sprint and distance swimmers at sprint pace.

Authors:  Carla B McCabe; Stelios Psycharakis; Ross Sanders
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.337

8.  Arm coordination in elite backstroke swimmers.

Authors:  Didier Chollet; Ludovic M Seifert; Melwyn Carter
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.337

9.  Predicting the intra-cyclic variation of the velocity of the centre of mass from segmental velocities in butterfly stroke: a pilot study.

Authors:  Tiago M Barbosa; Ricardo J Fernandes; Pedro Morouco; Joao P Vilas-Boas
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

10.  Relationships of stroke rate, distance per stroke, and velocity in competitive swimming.

Authors:  A B Craig; D R Pendergast
Journal:  Med Sci Sports       Date:  1979
View more
  6 in total

1.  Inertial Sensors in Swimming: Detection of Stroke Phases through 3D Wrist Trajectory.

Authors:  Matteo Cortesi; Andrea Giovanardi; Giorgio Gatta; Anna L Mangia; Sandro Bartolomei; Silvia Fantozzi
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Velocity Variability and Performance in Backstroke in Elite and Good-Level Swimmers.

Authors:  Aléxia Fernandes; Márcio Goethel; Daniel A Marinho; Bruno Mezêncio; João Paulo Vilas-Boas; Ricardo Jorge Fernandes
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  The Use of IMMUs in a Water Environment: Instrument Validation and Application of 3D Multi-Body Kinematic Analysis in Medicine and Sport.

Authors:  Anna Lisa Mangia; Matteo Cortesi; Silvia Fantozzi; Andrea Giovanardi; Davide Borra; Giorgio Gatta
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Arm-Stroke Descriptor Variability during 200-m Front Crawl Swimming.

Authors:  Matteo Cortesi; Rocco Di Michele; Silvia Fantozzi; Sandro Bartolomei; Giorgio Gatta
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Integrated Timing of Stroking, Breathing, and Kicking in Front-Crawl Swimming: A Novel Stroke-by-Stroke Approach Using Wearable Inertial Sensors.

Authors:  Silvia Fantozzi; Vittorio Coloretti; Maria Francesca Piacentini; Claudio Quagliarotti; Sandro Bartolomei; Giorgio Gatta; Matteo Cortesi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Reliability of Measuring Leg Segments and Joint Angles Using Smartphones during Aquatic Exercise.

Authors:  Dae Hee Lee; Seulki Han
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2022-01-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.