UNLABELLED: This study examined reliability and concurrent validity of the newly developed OMNI-vibration exercise scale (OMNI-VIBRO) to measure Ratings of Perceived Exertion (RPE) during vibration exercise in twenty recreationally active students (12 males and 8 females). The criterion variables were muscle activity of the Vastus Medialis (VM), Vastus Lateralis (VL), Biceps Femoris (BF), and Medial Gastrocnemius (MG) muscles, as well as accelerations (12.5, 20.2, 30.9, 36.3, 60.1, and 88.4 m·s(-2)). RPE was registered during the final of each 30 s condition. Each participant attended two laboratory testing sessions. Positive linear regression coefficients (p < 0.001) were found between RPE (OMNI-VIBRO) and acceleration (r = 0.976) and muscle activity of lower-body muscles (r = 0.942). Between session (test-retest), reliability of RPE (OMNI-VIBRO) was good (ICC: 0.790. 95% CI: 0.699-0.854). CONCLUSIONS: findings provided concurrent validation of the OMNI-VIBRO to measure RPE for the active muscle and overall body in recreationally active students performing lower-body vibration exercise. Key pointsThe pictorial-verbal category scale of perception of exertion (OMNI-VIBRO) during lower body vibration exercise on a vibration platform showed good concurrent validity.The OMNI-VIBRO method in conjunction with WBV exercise would allow coaches, fitness professionals, or health-care personnel to assess the intensity that corresponds to the level of the vibratory stimulus.The OMNI-VIBRO could be a useful tool of measuring the different intensities of a vibratory-training session and altering the vibratory stimulus in a periodized fashion.
UNLABELLED: This study examined reliability and concurrent validity of the newly developed OMNI-vibration exercise scale (OMNI-VIBRO) to measure Ratings of Perceived Exertion (RPE) during vibration exercise in twenty recreationally active students (12 males and 8 females). The criterion variables were muscle activity of the Vastus Medialis (VM), Vastus Lateralis (VL), Biceps Femoris (BF), and Medial Gastrocnemius (MG) muscles, as well as accelerations (12.5, 20.2, 30.9, 36.3, 60.1, and 88.4 m·s(-2)). RPE was registered during the final of each 30 s condition. Each participant attended two laboratory testing sessions. Positive linear regression coefficients (p < 0.001) were found between RPE (OMNI-VIBRO) and acceleration (r = 0.976) and muscle activity of lower-body muscles (r = 0.942). Between session (test-retest), reliability of RPE (OMNI-VIBRO) was good (ICC: 0.790. 95% CI: 0.699-0.854). CONCLUSIONS: findings provided concurrent validation of the OMNI-VIBRO to measure RPE for the active muscle and overall body in recreationally active students performing lower-body vibration exercise. Key pointsThe pictorial-verbal category scale of perception of exertion (OMNI-VIBRO) during lower body vibration exercise on a vibration platform showed good concurrent validity.The OMNI-VIBRO method in conjunction with WBV exercise would allow coaches, fitness professionals, or health-care personnel to assess the intensity that corresponds to the level of the vibratory stimulus.The OMNI-VIBRO could be a useful tool of measuring the different intensities of a vibratory-training session and altering the vibratory stimulus in a periodized fashion.
Authors: Pedro J Marín; Azael J Herrero; David García-López; Matthew R Rhea; José López-Chicharro; Javier González-Gallego; Nuria Garatachea Journal: J Strength Cond Res Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Nuria Garatachea; Alfonso Jiménez; Guilherme Bresciani; Nelson A Mariño; Javier González-Gallego; José A de Paz Journal: J Strength Cond Res Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Andrew F J Abercromby; William E Amonette; Charles S Layne; Brian K McFarlin; Martha R Hinman; William H Paloski Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: R J Robertson; F L Goss; N F Boer; J A Peoples; A J Foreman; I M Dabayebeh; N B Millich; G Balasekaran; S E Riechman; J D Gallagher; T Thompkins Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Darryl J Cochrane; Francesco Sartor; Keith Winwood; Stephen R Stannard; Marco V Narici; Jörn Rittweger Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Juan C Colado; Xavier Garcia-Masso; N Travis Triplett; Joaquin Calatayud; Jorge Flandez; David Behm; Michael E Rogers Journal: J Sports Sci Med Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 2.988