Literature DB >> 24149293

Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation (15 Hz RPMS) of the Human Soleus Muscle did not Affect Spinal Excitability.

Martin Behrens1, Anett Mau-Möller, Volker Zschorlich, Sven Bruhn.   

Abstract

The electric field induced by repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (RPMS) is able to activate muscles artificially due to the stimulation of deep intramuscular motor axons. RPMS applied to the muscle induces proprioceptive input to the central nervous system in different ways. Firstly, the indirect activation of mechanoreceptors and secondly, direct activation of afferent nerve fibers. The purpose of the study was to examine the effects of RPMS applied to the soleus. Thirteen male subjects received RPMS once and were investigated before and after the treatment regarding the parameters maximal M wave (Mmax), maximal H-reflex (Hmax), Hmax/Mmax-ratio, Hmax and Mmax onset latencies and plantar flexor peak twitch torque associated with Hmax (PTH). Eleven male subjects served as controls. No significant changes were observed for Hmax and PTH of the treatment group but the Hmax/Mmax-ratio increased significantly (p = 0.015) on account of a significantly decreased Mmax (p = 0.027). Hmax onset latencies were increased for the treatment group (p = 0.003) as well as for the control group (p = 0.011) while Mmax onset latencies did not change. It is concluded that the RPMS protocol did not affect spinal excitability but acted on the muscle fibres which are part of fast twitch units and mainly responsible for the generation of the maximal M wave. RPMS probably modified the integrity of neuromuscular propagation. Key pointsRPMS probably did not affect spinal excitability.Data suggested that RPMS likely acted on the muscle fibres which are part of fast twitch units and mainly responsible for the generation of the maximal M wave.RPMS probably modified the integrity of neuromuscular propagation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electromyography; H-reflex; M wave; repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation; soleus; twitch torque

Year:  2011        PMID: 24149293      PMCID: PMC3737913     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  34 in total

1.  The history and basic principles of magnetic nerve stimulation.

Authors:  A T Barker
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl       Date:  1999

2.  Re-examination of training effects by electrostimulation in the human elbow musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  S Colson; A Martin; J Van Hoecke
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.118

3.  Synaptic vesicle dynamics in rat fast and slow motor nerve terminals.

Authors:  B Reid; C R Slater; G S Bewick
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Effects of temperature on neuromuscular electrophysiology.

Authors:  S B Rutkove
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.217

5.  Activation of human plantar flexor muscles increases after electromyostimulation training.

Authors:  Nicola A Maffiuletti; Manuela Pensini; Alain Martin
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2002-04

6.  M wave and H-reflex of soleus muscle before and after electrical muscle stimulation in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Y Tanino; S Daikuya; T Nishimori; K Takasaki; T Suzuki
Journal:  Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-09

7.  Presynaptic failure of neuromuscular propagation in rats.

Authors:  K KRNJEVIC; R MILEDI
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1959-12       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Magnetic stimulation of muscle evokes cerebral potentials by direct activation of nerve afferents: a study during muscle paralysis.

Authors:  Y Zhu; A Starr; S Haldeman; H Fu; J Liu; P Wu
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.217

9.  Preferential activation of muscle fibers with peripheral magnetic stimulation of the limb.

Authors:  B P Lotz; J W Dunne; J R Daube
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.217

10.  Development of desensitization during repetitive end-plate activity and single end-plate currents in frog muscle.

Authors:  R A Giniatullin; G Khamitov; R Khazipov; L G Magazanik; E E Nikolsky; V A Snetkov; F Vyskocil
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  5 in total

1.  Body representation underlies response of proprioceptive acuity to repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Yunxiang Xia; Kento Tanaka; Man Yang; Shinichi Izumi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 3.473

2.  Controversies and Clinical Applications of Non-Invasive Transspinal Magnetic Stimulation: A Critical Review and Exploratory Trial in Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia.

Authors:  Rafael Bernhart Carra; Guilherme Diogo Silva; Isabela Bruzzi Bezerra Paraguay; Fabricio Diniz de Lima; Janaina Reis Menezes; Aruane Mello Pineda; Glaucia Aline Nunes; Juliana da Silva Simões; Marcondes Cavalcante França; Rubens Gisbert Cury
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-14       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Modulation of sensorimotor cortex by repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Eugen Gallasch; Monica Christova; Alexander Kunz; Dietmar Rafolt; Stefan Golaszewski
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Influence of peripheral magnetic stimulation of soleus muscle on H and M waves.

Authors:  Tadamitsu Matsuda; Taichi Kurayama; Miki Tagami; Yuji Fujino; Atsushi Manji; Yasuaki Kusumoto; Kazu Amimoto
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2018-05-08

5.  Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Nerve Stimulation (rPMS) as Adjuvant Therapy Reduces Skeletal Muscle Reflex Activity.

Authors:  Volker R Zschorlich; Martin Hillebrecht; Tammam Tanjour; Fengxue Qi; Frank Behrendt; Timo Kirschstein; Rüdiger Köhling
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.003

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.