Literature DB >> 24149197

Effects of run-up velocity on performance, kinematics, and energy exchanges in the pole vault.

Nicholas P Linthorne1, A H Gemma Weetman.   

Abstract

This study examined the effect of run-up velocity on the peak height achieved by the athlete in the pole vault and on the corresponding changes in the athlete's kinematics and energy exchanges. Seventeen jumps by an experienced male pole vaulter were video recorded in the sagittal plane and a wide range of run-up velocities (4.5-8.5 m/s) was obtained by setting the length of the athlete's run-up (2-16 steps). A selection of performance variables, kinematic variables, energy variables, and pole variables were calculated from the digitized video data. We found that the athlete's peak height increased linearly at a rate of 0.54 m per 1 m/s increase in run-up velocity and this increase was achieved through a combination of a greater grip height and a greater push height. At the athlete's competition run-up velocity (8.4 m/s) about one third of the rate of increase in peak height arose from an increase in grip height and about two thirds arose from an increase in push height. Across the range of run-up velocities examined here the athlete always performed the basic actions of running, planting, jumping, and inverting on the pole. However, he made minor systematic changes to his jumping kinematics, vaulting kinematics, and selection of pole characteristics as the run-up velocity increased. The increase in run-up velocity and changes in the athlete's vaulting kinematics resulted in substantial changes to the magnitudes of the energy exchanges during the vault. A faster run-up produced a greater loss of energy during the take-off, but this loss was not sufficient to negate the increase in run-up velocity and the increase in work done by the athlete during the pole support phase. The athlete therefore always had a net energy gain during the vault. However, the magnitude of this gain decreased slightly as run-up velocity increased. Key pointsIn the pole vault the optimum technique is to run-up as fast as possible.The athlete's vault height increases at a rate of about 0.5 m per 1 m/s increase in run-up velocity.The increase in vault height is achieved through a greater grip height and a greater push height. At the athlete's competition run-up velocity about one third of the rate of increase in vault height arises from an increase in grip height and two thirds arises from an increase in push height.The athlete has a net energy gain during the vault. A faster run-up velocity produces a greater loss of energy during the take-off but this loss of energy is not sufficient to negate the increase in run-up velocity and the increase in the work done by the athlete during the pole support phase.

Keywords:  Sports biomechanics; kinematics

Year:  2012        PMID: 24149197      PMCID: PMC3737876     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  11 in total

1.  Influence of different approaches for calculating the athlete's mechanical energy on energetic parameters in the pole vault.

Authors:  F Schade; A Arampatzis; G Brüggemann
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Effect of the pole--human body interaction on pole vaulting performance.

Authors:  Adamantios Arampatzis; Falk Schade; Gert-Peter Brüggemann
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Comparison of the take-off ground reaction force patterns of the pole vault and the long jump.

Authors:  E I Plessa; E N Rousanoglou; K D Boudolos
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.637

4.  Pole vault performance for anthropometric variability via a dynamical optimal control model.

Authors:  Guangyu Liu; Sing-Kiong Nguang; Yanxin Zhang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  The mechanical energy transformations of pole vaulting with a fiberglass pole.

Authors:  C J Dillman; R C Nelson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Changes in long jump take-off technique with increasing run-up speed.

Authors:  Lisa A Bridgett; Nicholas P Linthorne
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.337

7.  Single-subject methodology: an alternative approach.

Authors:  B T Bates
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Influence of pole length and stiffness on the energy conversion in pole-vaulting.

Authors:  M Ekevad; B Lundberg
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Techniques used by elite long jumpers in preparation for takeoff.

Authors:  J G Hay; H Nohara
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Dynamics of the pole vault.

Authors:  M Hubbard
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  3 in total

1.  Biomechanical Pole Vault Patterns Were Associated With a Higher Proportion of Injuries.

Authors:  Pascal Edouard; Hervé Sanchez; Cyprien Bourrilhon; Sébastien Homo; Julien Frère; Johan Cassirame
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2019-09-06

2.  Kinematics of the Final Approach and Take-Off Phases in World-Class Men and Women Pole Vaulters.

Authors:  Brian Hanley; Helen J Gravestock; Mike Hopkinson; Giorgos P Paradisis; Stéphane Merlino; Athanassios Bissas
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-04-06

3.  Linear Decrease in Athletic Performance During the Human Life Span.

Authors:  Bergita Ganse; Urs Ganse; Julian Dahl; Hans Degens
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 4.566

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.