Xiaohua Fu1, Aihua Song1, Yunjie Zhou1, Xiaoguang Ma2, Jingjing Jiao1, Min Yang1, Shankuan Zhu1. 1. 1Obesity and Body Composition Research Center,Chronic Disease Research Institute,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou,People's Republic of China. 2. 3Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics,Arnold School of Public Health,University of South Carolina,Columbia,SC,USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of regional fat depots with metabolic risk factors in Chinese women. DESIGN: Total and regional fat depots including android fat and gynoid fat were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Central fat distribution was defined as android:gynoid fat ratio. Metabolic risk factors were defined as elevated TAG, reduced HDL-cholesterol, elevated blood pressure and elevated fasting plasma glucose. Logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the associations of regional fat depots with metabolic risk factors. The odds ratios of metabolic risks were further calculated according to tertiles of android fat and gynoid fat. SETTING: Participants were recruited from a community-based cross-sectional study. Face-to-face questionnaires, anthropometric and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measures were conducted. SUBJECTS: Chinese women (n 609) aged 18-79 years. RESULTS: Android fat and android:gynoid fat ratio were associated with significantly increased odds (OR = 1·4-3·7; P < 0·01) for almost all risk factors, whereas gynoid fat was independently associated with significantly decreased odds (OR = 0·3-0·6; P < 0·01). The inverse associations of gynoid fat with metabolic risk factors remained after adjusting for android fat. Even if their android fat level was in high, women in the highest tertile of gynoid fat had lower odds of having at least two metabolic risk factors compared with women in the lowest gynoid fat tertile (P for trend < 0·01). CONCLUSIONS: There were opposite associations of android and gynoid fat with metabolic risks in Chinese women. Gynoid fat rather than android fat might be a more important inclusion in metabolic disease risk evaluation in female Asians.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of regional fat depots with metabolic risk factors in Chinese women. DESIGN: Total and regional fat depots including android fat and gynoid fat were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Central fat distribution was defined as android:gynoid fat ratio. Metabolic risk factors were defined as elevated TAG, reduced HDL-cholesterol, elevated blood pressure and elevated fasting plasma glucose. Logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the associations of regional fat depots with metabolic risk factors. The odds ratios of metabolic risks were further calculated according to tertiles of android fat and gynoid fat. SETTING:Participants were recruited from a community-based cross-sectional study. Face-to-face questionnaires, anthropometric and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measures were conducted. SUBJECTS: Chinese women (n 609) aged 18-79 years. RESULTS: Android fat and android:gynoid fat ratio were associated with significantly increased odds (OR = 1·4-3·7; P < 0·01) for almost all risk factors, whereas gynoid fat was independently associated with significantly decreased odds (OR = 0·3-0·6; P < 0·01). The inverse associations of gynoid fat with metabolic risk factors remained after adjusting for android fat. Even if their android fat level was in high, women in the highest tertile of gynoid fat had lower odds of having at least two metabolic risk factors compared with women in the lowest gynoid fat tertile (P for trend < 0·01). CONCLUSIONS: There were opposite associations of android and gynoid fat with metabolic risks in Chinese women. Gynoid fat rather than android fat might be a more important inclusion in metabolic disease risk evaluation in female Asians.
Authors: Jonathan P Bennett; Yong En Liu; Brandon K Quon; Nisa N Kelly; Lambert T Leong; Michael C Wong; Samantha F Kennedy; Dominic C Chow; Andrea K Garber; Ethan J Weiss; Steven B Heymsfield; John A Shepherd Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2022-08 Impact factor: 9.298
Authors: Jonathan Sivakumar; Lynn Chong; Salena Ward; Tom R Sutherland; Matthew Read; Michael W Hii Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Adela Brahimaj; Fernando Rivadeneira; Taulant Muka; Eric J G Sijbrands; Oscar H Franco; Abbas Dehghan; Maryam Kavousi Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2019-06-10 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Mahasampath Gowri S; Belavendra Antonisamy; Finney S Geethanjali; Nihal Thomas; Felix Jebasingh; Thomas V Paul; Fredrik Karpe; Clive Osmond; Caroline H D Fall; Senthil K Vasan Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2021-07-30 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Yide Yang; Ming Xie; Shuqian Yuan; Yuan Zeng; Yanhui Dong; Zhenghe Wang; Qiu Xiao; Bin Dong; Jun Ma; Jie Hu Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-06-26 Impact factor: 3.295