Literature DB >> 24148778

Multidetector CT predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch in transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Melanie Freeman1, John G Webb, Alexander B Willson, Miriam Wheeler, Philipp Blanke, Robert R Moss, Christopher R Thompson, Brad Munt, Bjarne L Norgaard, Tae-Hyun Yang, James K Min, Steen Poulsen, Nicolaj C Hansson, Ronald K Binder, Stefan Toggweiler, Cameron Hague, David A Wood, Philippe Pibarot, Jonathon Leipsic.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) is a predictor of mortality after aortic valve replacement (AVR).
OBJECTIVE: We examined whether accurate 3-dimensional annular sizing with multidetector CT (MDCT) is predictive of PPM after transcatheter AVR (TAVR).
METHODS: One hundred twenty-eight patients underwent MDCT then TAVR. Moderate PPM was defined as an indexed effective orifice area ≤0.85 cm²/m² and severe ≤0.65 cm²/m². MDCT annular measurements (area, short and long axis) were compared with the size of the selected transcatheter heart valve (THV) to obtain (1) the difference between prosthesis size and CT-measured mean annular diameter and (2) the percentage of undersizing or oversizing (calculated as 100 × [MDCT annular area--THV nominal area]/THV nominal area). In addition, the MDCT annular area was indexed to body surface area. These measures were evaluated as potential PPM predictors.
RESULTS: We found that 42.2% of patients had moderate PPM and 9.4% had severe PPM. Procedural characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were similar between patients with or without PPM. THV undersizing of the mean aortic annulus diameter was not predictive of PPM (odds ratio [OR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.65-1.07; P = .16; area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.58). THV undersizing of annular area was not predictive of PPM (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.80-1.16; P = .69; AUC, 0.52). Indexed MDCT annular area was, however, predictive of PPM (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.10-0.59; P < .001; AUC, 0.66).
CONCLUSIONS: PPM is frequent after TAVR. Appropriate annular oversizing does not reduce the rate or severity of PPM. Patient annulus size mismatch, identified by indexed MDCT annular area, is a significant predictor of PPM.
Copyright © 2013 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic stenosis; Computed tomography; Prosthesis–patient mismatch; Prosthetic heart valve; Transcatheter aortic valve implantation; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24148778     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2013.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr        ISSN: 1876-861X


  4 in total

1.  Mini-aortic valve replacements are not associated with an increased incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch: a propensity-scored analysis.

Authors:  J Trent Magruder; Joshua C Grimm; Arman Kilic; Todd Crawford; John V Conte; Duke E Cameron; Ashish S Shah
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-12-19

Review 2.  Clinical and Technical Challenges of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Authors:  Pier Pasquale Leone; Fabio Fazzari; Francesco Cannata; Jorge Sanz-Sanchez; Antonio Mangieri; Lorenzo Monti; Ottavia Cozzi; Giulio Giuseppe Stefanini; Renato Bragato; Antonio Colombo; Bernhard Reimers; Damiano Regazzoli
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-06-04

3.  Three-dimensional thoracic aorta principal strain analysis from routine ECG-gated computerized tomography: feasibility in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Alessandro Satriano; Zachary Guenther; James A White; Naeem Merchant; Elena S Di Martino; Faisal Al-Qoofi; Carmen P Lydell; Nowell M Fine
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Incidence, Predictors and Outcome of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yan-Biao Liao; Yi-Jian Li; Li Jun-Li; Zhen-Gang Zhao; Xin Wei; Jiay-Yu Tsauo; Tian-Yuan Xiong; Yuan-Ning Xu; Yuan Feng; Mao Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.