| Literature DB >> 24148334 |
S Milošević Medenica1, V V Vućković, B Prstojević.
Abstract
The overall results of CT angiography on 64-slice MSCT published in the last five years are very close to results of DSA which is still a gold standard in the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms. The aim of this study is to contribute to the confidence in reliability of this method and to try to answer the question of whether CTA should be used as the first diagnostic modality in patients with suspect intracranial aneurysms. In the period from October 2008 to August 2009 we diagnosed 118 aneurysms in 73 patients. We included in this study only those patients who underwent either DSA, surgical treatment or both after MSCTA, and the remainder of the above patients were not treated and are followed up, or died before treatment. So our group comprised 47 patients who were divided into two groups. The first group of 22 patients underwent DSA after MSCTA. We found 36 aneurysms in this group. One aneurysm was falsely positive compared to DSA, while 35 were in concordance with DSA. DSA revealed five aneurysms smaller than 4 mm not disclosed by MSCTA. The second group comprised 25 patients who were operated according to MSCTA findings only. There were 33 aneurysms in this group: 25 aneurysms were operated and surgical findings agreed with MSCTA. Eight aneurysms smaller than 4 mm were not operated and we do not have confirmation for them. In all false positive and false negative cases the misdiagnosed aneurysms were in fact 1-1.5 mm outpouchings that were not responsible for SAH. According to the available literature and our results, MSCTA has proved a very reliable method, simple and safe, competent to be used as a diagnostic modality of choice in the patients with SAH or suspect unruptured aneurysm. DSA should be used in cases of negative or uncertain findings on MSCTA, excluding cases of perimesencephalic SAH with negative MSCTA. The relative disadvantage of this method is its lower sensitivity in the detection of tiny outpouchings, especially in the infraclionid region where this method has still limited possibilities.Entities:
Year: 2010 PMID: 24148334 DOI: 10.1177/197140091002300110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroradiol J ISSN: 1971-4009