Literature DB >> 24148092

International trade standards for commodities and products derived from animals: the need for a system that integrates food safety and animal disease risk management.

G R Thomson1, M-L Penrith, M W Atkinson, S Thalwitzer, A Mancuso, S J Atkinson, S A Osofsky.   

Abstract

A case is made for greater emphasis to be placed on value chain management as an alternative to geographically based disease risk mitigation for trade in commodities and products derived from animals. The geographic approach is dependent upon achievement of freedom in countries or zones from infectious agents that cause so-called transboundary animal diseases, while value chain-based risk management depends upon mitigation of animal disease hazards potentially associated with specific commodities or products irrespective of the locality of production. This commodity-specific approach is founded on the same principles upon which international food safety standards are based, viz. hazard analysis critical control points (HACCP). Broader acceptance of a value chain approach enables animal disease risk management to be combined with food safety management by the integration of commodity-based trade and HACCP methodologies and thereby facilitates 'farm to fork' quality assurance. The latter is increasingly recognized as indispensable to food safety assurance and is therefore a pre-condition to safe trade. The biological principles upon which HACCP and commodity-based trade are based are essentially identical, potentially simplifying sanitary control in contrast to current separate international sanitary standards for food safety and animal disease risks that are difficult to reconcile. A value chain approach would not only enable more effective integration of food safety and animal disease risk management of foodstuffs derived from animals but would also ameliorate adverse environmental and associated socio-economic consequences of current sanitary standards based on the geographic distribution of animal infections. This is especially the case where vast veterinary cordon fencing systems are relied upon to separate livestock and wildlife as is the case in much of southern Africa. A value chain approach would thus be particularly beneficial to under-developed regions of the world such as southern Africa specifically and sub-Saharan Africa more generally where it would reduce incompatibility between attempts to expand and commercialize livestock production and the need to conserve the subcontinent's unparalleled wildlife and wilderness resources.
© 2013 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Keywords:  HACCP; commodity-based trade; foot-and-mouth disease; value chains

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24148092     DOI: 10.1111/tbed.12164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis        ISSN: 1865-1674            Impact factor:   5.005


  6 in total

Review 1.  Foot-and-Mouth Disease Impact on Smallholders - What Do We Know, What Don't We Know and How Can We Find Out More?

Authors:  T J D Knight-Jones; M McLaws; J Rushton
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.005

Review 2.  Effectiveness and practicality of control strategies for African swine fever: what do we really know?

Authors:  C Guinat; T Vergne; C Jurado-Diaz; J M Sánchez-Vizcaíno; L Dixon; D U Pfeiffer
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 2.695

3.  Self-Reporting of Risk Pathways and Parameter Values for Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Slaughter Cattle from Alternative Production Systems by Kenyan and Ugandan Veterinarians.

Authors:  Julie Adamchick; Karl M Rich; Andres M Perez
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 5.048

4.  Extend existing food safety systems to the global wildlife trade.

Authors:  Duan Biggs; Hernan Caceres-Escobar; Richard Kock; Gavin Thomson; James Compton
Journal:  Lancet Planet Health       Date:  2021-07

5.  Transmission of Foot-and-Mouth Disease SAT2 Viruses at the Wildlife-Livestock Interface of Two Major Transfrontier Conservation Areas in Southern Africa.

Authors:  Barbara P Brito; Ferran Jori; Rahana Dwarka; Francois F Maree; Livio Heath; Andres M Perez
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  The Effect of the Post 2001 Reforms on FMD Risks of the International Live Animal Trade.

Authors:  David W Shanafelt; C Perrings
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.184

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.