K L Shaw1, A Watanabe, E Rankin, J E McDonagh. 1. School of Health and Population Sciences (Nursing and Physiotherapy), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine the quality of transitional care in a paediatric and adult hospital by investigating (i) adherence to national transition guidance and (ii) whether implementation is associated with better patient/carer experiences. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a UK paediatric hospital (PH) and neighbouring adult hospital. Clinics completed a questionnaire to determine characteristics of their transitional care provision and invited patients aged 11-21 years and parents/carers to complete a questionnaire ('Mind the Gap') to assess their satisfaction. RESULTS: Twenty-three clinics participated. Fourteen (70%) reported delivering a transition programme, but only 5 (25%) indicated this was holistic (addressing medical, psychosocial and vocational issues). Participants included 457 young people and 330 parents, 71% and 88% respectively attending the PH. Ratings of current care were significantly lower than ratings of best care. These 'gap' scores were not excessive, although some participants were very dissatisfied. Better satisfaction was associated with attending clinics that provided transitional care, especially when defined as 'holistic' and youth-friendly. CONCLUSIONS: Transition programmes that adhere to current guidance are associated with better satisfaction, but variations in provision suggest barriers to implementation. Attention is required to how youth-friendly transitional care is defined with particular reference to the specific clinic model.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the quality of transitional care in a paediatric and adult hospital by investigating (i) adherence to national transition guidance and (ii) whether implementation is associated with better patient/carer experiences. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a UK paediatric hospital (PH) and neighbouring adult hospital. Clinics completed a questionnaire to determine characteristics of their transitional care provision and invited patients aged 11-21 years and parents/carers to complete a questionnaire ('Mind the Gap') to assess their satisfaction. RESULTS: Twenty-three clinics participated. Fourteen (70%) reported delivering a transition programme, but only 5 (25%) indicated this was holistic (addressing medical, psychosocial and vocational issues). Participants included 457 young people and 330 parents, 71% and 88% respectively attending the PH. Ratings of current care were significantly lower than ratings of best care. These 'gap' scores were not excessive, although some participants were very dissatisfied. Better satisfaction was associated with attending clinics that provided transitional care, especially when defined as 'holistic' and youth-friendly. CONCLUSIONS: Transition programmes that adhere to current guidance are associated with better satisfaction, but variations in provision suggest barriers to implementation. Attention is required to how youth-friendly transitional care is defined with particular reference to the specific clinic model.
Authors: Albert Farre; Victoria Wood; Tim Rapley; Jeremy R Parr; Debbie Reape; Janet E McDonagh Journal: Arch Dis Child Date: 2014-09-26 Impact factor: 3.791
Authors: Margot Walter; Sylvia Kamphuis; Philomine van Pelt; Annemarie de Vroed; Johanna M W Hazes Journal: Pediatr Rheumatol Online J Date: 2018-08-03 Impact factor: 3.054
Authors: Tim Rapley; Albert Farre; Jeremy R Parr; Victoria J Wood; Debbie Reape; Gail Dovey-Pearce; Janet McDonagh Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-09-09 Impact factor: 2.692