Literature DB >> 24147902

The international experience of single-incision pediatric endosurgery: current state of the art.

Barrie S Rich1, John Creasy, Cheguevara Afaneh, Oliver J Muensterer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: As application and awareness of single-incision pediatric endosurgery (SIPES) are increasing, various techniques and indications have been independently described by select centers around the world. In order to facilitate a cooperative approach toward advancing and investigating the practice of SIPES, we conducted a survey among members of the International Pediatric Endosurgery Group (IPEG), asking them about their experience and attitudes toward single-incision endosurgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: After institutional review board approval, an invitation to participate in an online survey was sent to all IPEG members. Questions focused on demographic information, practice patterns, indications, and equipment used regarding SIPES.
RESULTS: Of the 560 contacted active IPEG members, 115 completed the survey (recall 21%). The respondents represented pediatric surgeons from 32 countries on six continents. Of respondents, 97% had heard of, while 71% had performed, SIPES. Reasons for not having performed SIPES included disbelief in benefit (59%), lack of proficiency (34%), and inadequate resources (28%). The most commonly performed SIPES procedures were appendectomy (85%), cholecystectomy (66%), splenectomy (42%), pyloromyotomy (35%), and intestinal surgery (13%), as well as Nissen fundoplication and gynecologic adnexal pathology (7%). The equipment and techniques utilized showed large variation and included some self-devised, innovative, low-resource approaches. Complications with SIPES reported by the survey participants included technical difficulties, wound infection, and prolonged operating time.
CONCLUSIONS: SIPES is being performed worldwide for a large spectrum of common indications in pediatric surgery. The equipment and techniques used vary with geographic location and resources. Some encountered complications are common to those seen with conventional minimally invasive surgery, whereas others may be SIPES-specific. Different respondents reported diverging views on pain, operating time, and cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24147902     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2013.0294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  4 in total

Review 1.  Single-incision pediatric endosurgery in newborns and infants.

Authors:  Yury Kozlov; Vladimir Novozhilov; Polina Baradieva; Pavel Krasnov; Konstantin Kovalkov; Oliver J Muensterer
Journal:  World J Clin Pediatr       Date:  2015-11-08

2.  Laparoendoscopic Single-Site (LESS) Surgery in Pediatric Urology: A 4-Year Experience.

Authors:  Mohamed Zouari; Mahdi Ben Dhaou; Saloua Ammar; Mohamed Jallouli; Riadh Mhiri
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2019-05-10

3.  Single-Incision Single-Instrument Adnexal Surgery in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Tara Loux; Gavin A Falk; Michaela Gaffley; Stephanie Ortega; Carmen Ramos; Leopoldo Malvezzi; Colin G Knight; Cathy Burnweit
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2015-10-07

4.  Single Incision Pediatric Endoscopic Surgery: From Myth to Reality a Case Series.

Authors:  Bradley J Wallace; Raphael N Vuille-Dit-Bille; Ahmed I Marwan
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-09-07       Impact factor: 2.430

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.