Literature DB >> 24147190

How we can measure quality in colonoscopy?

Leonidas A Bourikas1, Zacharias P Tsiamoulos, Adam Haycock, Siwan Thomas-Gibson, Brian P Saunders.   

Abstract

Measuring quality is a current need of medical services either to assess their cost-effectiveness or to identify discrepancies requiring refinement. With the advent of bowel cancer screening and increasing patient awareness of bowel symptoms, there has been an unprecedented increase in demand for colonoscopy. Consequently, there is an expanding open-discussion on missed rates of cancer or precancerous polyps during diagnostic/screening colonoscopy and on the rate of adverse events related to therapeutic colonoscopy. Delivering a quality colonoscopy service is therefore a healthcare priority. Colonoscopy is a multi-step process and therefore assessment of all aspects of the procedure must be addressed. Quality in colonoscopy refers to a combination of many patient-centered technical and non-technical skills and knowledge aiming to patient's safety and satisfaction through a continuous effort for improvement. The benefits of this endless process are hiding behind small details which can eventually make the difference in colonoscopy. Identifying specific quality metrics help to define and shape an optimal service and forms a secure basis of improvement. Τhis paper does not aim to give technical details on how to perform colonoscopy but to summarize what to measure and when, in accordance with the current identified quality indicators and standards for colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; Metrics; Outcome; Quality assurance; Standards

Year:  2013        PMID: 24147190      PMCID: PMC3797899          DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i10.468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc


  61 in total

Review 1.  Split dosing of bowel preparations for colonoscopy: an analysis of its efficacy, safety, and tolerability.

Authors:  Lawrence B Cohen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Quality of bowel cleansing for afternoon colonoscopy is influenced by time of administration.

Authors:  Suryakanth R Gurudu; Shiva Ratuapli; Russell Heigh; John DiBaise; Jonathan Leighton; Michael Crowell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Antibiotic prophylaxis for GI endoscopy.

Authors:  Subhas Banerjee; Bo Shen; Todd H Baron; Douglas B Nelson; Michelle A Anderson; Brooks D Cash; Jason A Dominitz; S Ian Gan; M Edwyn Harrison; Steven O Ikenberry; Sanjay B Jagannath; David Lichtenstein; Robert D Fanelli; Ken Lee; Trina van Guilder; Leslie E Stewart
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.

Authors:  Thomas J W Lee; Matthew D Rutter; Roger G Blanks; Sue M Moss; Andrew F Goddard; Andrew Chilton; Claire Nickerson; Richard J Q McNally; Julietta Patnick; Colin J Rees
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Images of the terminal ileum are more convincing than cecal images for verifying the extent of colonoscopy.

Authors:  N Powell; H Knight; J Dunn; V Saxena; J Mawdsley; C Murray; J Hoare; J Teare; A McNair
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: prospective randomized assessment of efficacy and of induced mucosal abnormality with three preparation agents.

Authors:  I C Lawrance; R P Willert; K Murray
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study.

Authors:  Florian Froehlich; Vincent Wietlisbach; Jean-Jacques Gonvers; Bernard Burnand; John-Paul Vader
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Time requirements and health effects of participation in colorectal cancer screening with colonoscopy or computed tomography colonography in a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  L van Dam; T R de Wijkerslooth; M C de Haan; E M Stoop; P M M Bossuyt; P Fockens; M Thomeer; E J Kuipers; M E van Leerdam; M van Ballegooijen; J Stoker; E Dekker; E W Steyerberg
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Thomas F Imperiale; Danielle R Latinovich; L Lisa Bratcher
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Does end tidal CO2 monitoring during emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia with propofol decrease the incidence of hypoxic events? A randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Kenneth Deitch; Jim Miner; Carl R Chudnofsky; Paul Dominici; Daniel Latta
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 5.721

View more
  4 in total

1.  Using motion capture to assess colonoscopy experience level.

Authors:  Morten Bo Svendsen; Louise Preisler; Jens Georg Hillingsoe; Lars Bo Svendsen; Lars Konge
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-05-16

2.  Cost Effectiveness of Screening Colonoscopy Depends on Adequate Bowel Preparation Rates - A Modeling Study.

Authors:  James Kingsley; Siddharth Karanth; Frances Lee Revere; Deepak Agrawal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Does the withdrawal time affect adenoma detection in non-screening colonoscopies?

Authors:  Ammar Al-Rifaie; Mohammed El-Feki; Ismaeel Al-Talib; Maysam Abdulwahid; Andrew Hopper; Mo Thoufeeq
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-03-16

Review 4.  Non-technical skills and gastrointestinal endoscopy: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Charlotte R Hitchins; Magdalena Metzner; Judy Edworthy; Catherine Ward
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.