| Literature DB >> 24146955 |
Vivek Khanna1, Manish Jain, Vishal Singh, Jitendra S Kanshana, Prem Prakash, Manoj K Barthwal, Puvvada S R Murthy, Madhu Dikshit.
Abstract
Effect of long term cholesterol diet withdrawal on acceleEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24146955 PMCID: PMC3798418 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077037
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Experimental Protocol.
Sixty four male New Zealand White rabbits were fed atherogenic diet (AD) for 8 weeks to create atheroma. Seven animals were fed chow diet (CD) for 8 weeks. Balloon injury of iliac artery by Fogarty embolectomy catheter was performed 1 week after initiation of atherogenic diet. Baseline group was set at 8 weeks of atherogenic diet feedingfollowed by chow diet (CD) from 4 weeks up to 64 weeks in respective groups. n = number of animals
Lipid profile and histological measurements of iliac artery in various experimental groups.
| Parameters (mg/dl) | Normal | Baseline | Reg 4 week | Reg 8 week | Reg 16 week | Reg 32 week | Reg 50 week | Reg 64 week |
| TC | 59.0±5.8 | 1484±33.8 *** | 455.9±33.7### | 323.3±37.1### | 53.1±3.9### | 40.5±3.9### | 43.9±4.6### | 49.6±4.6### |
| TG | 66.1±4.3 | 356.5±65.7*** | 189.1±8.5### | 71.7±7.5### | 69.3±7.4### | 57.7±8.4### | 54±6.1### | 56.7±7.1### |
| LDL | 9.3±0.8 | 320.5±22.3*** | 266.1±22.9 | 189.7±24.2### | 20.8±1.8### | 10.6±0.6### | 9.6±0.7### | 10.1±0.8### |
| HDL | 12.4±0.4 | 22.8±1.0*** | 14.1±1.3### | 10.4±1.6### | 11.1±0.3### | 10.7±0.5### | 11.3±0.5### | 8.5±0.4### |
| I/M thickness ratio | 0.00±0.00 | 3.7±0.30*** | 6±0.53 | 10.3±0.60### | 6.7±0.52### | 3.5±0.35 | 3.1±0.26 | 1.8±0.15## |
| Plaque area (mm2) | 0.00±0.00 | 0.75±0.06*** | 0.86±0.05 | 1.5±0.1### | 0.9±0.09### | 0.54±0.04 | 0.47±0.05# | 0.38±0.05## |
| Lumen area (mm2) | 0.45±0.02 | 0.09±0.01*** | 0.12±0.02 | 0.15±0.01 | 0.1±0.01 | 0.20±0.02### | 0.24±0.02### | 0.23±0.02### |
| % CSN | 0.00±0.00 | 81.3±1.4*** | 86.7±2.8 | 85.5±1.6 | 73.6±1.7 | 56.4±1.2### | 56.3±4.2### | 54.3±8.3## |
Results expressed as mean ± SEM. TC: Total Cholesterol, TG: Triglyceride, LDL: Low density lipoprotein, HDL: High density lipoprotein, I/M thickness ratio: Intimal/medial thickness ratio, %CSN: Percentage cross sectional narrowing. ***p<0.001 vs. normal; #p<0.05, ##p<0.01 and ###p<0.001 vs Baseline. number of sections = 25–30 sections/group.
Figure 2Regression phase leads to progressive decrease in percentage lipid area and macrophage foam cell content.
Panel (A) Representative images of hematoxylin and eosin stained sections of all groups (Scale bar = 500 µm). Panel (B) Representative images of Oil Red O stained cryostat sections of all groups (Scale bar = 50 µm). Panel (C) Immunohistochemical staining showing CD68 positive cells in respective groups. (Scale bar = 50 µm) (D) Quantitative analysis of percentage lipid area (lumen area included) in respective groups (E) Quantitative analysis of CD68 positive labelling in respective groups. **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001 vs normal; ##p<0.01 and ###p<0.001 vs Baseline. (* indicates lumen, arrow heads indicate positive staining)
Figure 3Biphasic elevation and subsequent regression of ground substance and matrix metalloproteinase-9.
Panel (A) Representative images of movat pentachrome stained sections of all groups (Scale bar = 50 µm). Panel (B) Immunohistochemical staining showing MMP-9 positive area of all groups (Scale bar = 50 µm). (C) Quantitative analysis of alcian blue stained area in respective groups (D) Quantitative analysis of MMP-9 positive areas in respective groups (E) Arterial MMP-9 mRNA expression (fold change over normal) in all groups as determined by real time PCR (F) Arterial TIMP-1 mRNA expression (fold change over normal) in all groups as determined by real time PCR. **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001 vs normal; #p<0.05, ##p<0.01 and ###p<0.001 vs Baseline. (* indicates lumen, arrow heads indicate positive staining)
Figure 4Collagen (Sirius red staining) and α-actin smooth muscle content in various groups.
Panel (A) Representative images of Siruis red stained section of all groups under polarized light. Brightfield image of same section is shown as an inset (Scale bar = 50 µm). Panel (B) Immunohistochemical staining of α-actin in sections of all groups (Scale bar = 50 µm). (C) Quantitative analysis of α-actin positive stained area in respective groups (D) Arterial collagen I mRNA expression (fold change over normal) in all groups as determined by real time PCR (E) Arterial collagen III mRNA expression (fold change over normal) in all groups as determined by real time PCR. ***p<0.001 vs normal; ###p<0.001 vs Baseline. N.D = not detectable (* indicates lumen, arrow heads indicate positive staining)
Figure 5Vasoreactivity studies of injured iliac artery of all groups.
(A) Effect of incremental doses (1 nM–100 µM) of phenylephrine induced contractions on atherosclerotic iliac arteries of respective groups (B) Effect of incremental doses (3 nM–3 mM) of acetylcholine induced relaxation on atherosclerotic iliac arteries of respective groups (C) Arterial eNOS mRNA expression in all groups as determined by real time PCR. **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001 vs normal; #p<0.05, ##p<0.01 and ###p<0.001 vs Baseline.
Figure 6Summary.
Schematic evolution of atherosclerosis in balloon injured rabbit iliac artery on atherogenic diet withdrawal over a period of 1.4 years.