Rachel E J Roach1, Willem M Lijfering, Frits R Rosendaal, Suzanne C Cannegieter, Saskia le Cessie. 1. Department of Clinical Epidemiology (R.E.J.R., W.M.L., F.R.R., S.C.C., S.l.C.), Einthoven Laboratory for Experimental Vascular Medicine (W.M.L., F.R.R., S.C.C.), Thrombosis and Hemostasis Research Center (F.R.R.), and Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics (S.l.C.), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The risk of recurrent venous thrombosis is 2-fold higher in men than in women. In contrast, no such sex difference in the risk of first venous thrombosis has been reported. We hypothesized that, for a first event, a risk difference between the sexes is masked by female exposure to reproductive factors (oral contraception, pregnancy/puerperium, and postmenopausal hormone therapy). METHODS AND RESULTS: From the Multiple Environmental and Genetic Assessment of Risk Factors for Venous Thrombosis (MEGA) study, a population-based case-control study on risk factors for venous thrombosis, 2915 patients with a first venous thrombosis and their partners as control subjects were included. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for first venous thrombosis were assessed in men compared with women without reproductive risk factors by use of conditional logistic regression. Analyses were stratified in 10-year age categories to account for the variation in exposure to reproductive risk factors over different age groups and adjusted for body mass index and smoking. Overall, men had a 2.1-fold (95% confidence interval, 1.9-2.4) increased risk of first venous thrombosis compared with women without reproductive risk factors. Similar results were found when 10-year age categories were viewed separately. Adjustment for body mass index and smoking and exclusion of cancer patients did not materially affect the results. CONCLUSIONS: When female reproductive risk factors are taken into account, the risk of a first venous thrombosis is twice as high in men as in women. These findings are in line with previous studies on recurrent venous thrombosis and may have implications for future treatment and prevention strategies.
BACKGROUND: The risk of recurrent venous thrombosis is 2-fold higher in men than in women. In contrast, no such sex difference in the risk of first venous thrombosis has been reported. We hypothesized that, for a first event, a risk difference between the sexes is masked by female exposure to reproductive factors (oral contraception, pregnancy/puerperium, and postmenopausal hormone therapy). METHODS AND RESULTS: From the Multiple Environmental and Genetic Assessment of Risk Factors for Venous Thrombosis (MEGA) study, a population-based case-control study on risk factors for venous thrombosis, 2915 patients with a first venous thrombosis and their partners as control subjects were included. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for first venous thrombosis were assessed in men compared with women without reproductive risk factors by use of conditional logistic regression. Analyses were stratified in 10-year age categories to account for the variation in exposure to reproductive risk factors over different age groups and adjusted for body mass index and smoking. Overall, men had a 2.1-fold (95% confidence interval, 1.9-2.4) increased risk of first venous thrombosis compared with women without reproductive risk factors. Similar results were found when 10-year age categories were viewed separately. Adjustment for body mass index and smoking and exclusion of cancerpatients did not materially affect the results. CONCLUSIONS: When female reproductive risk factors are taken into account, the risk of a first venous thrombosis is twice as high in men as in women. These findings are in line with previous studies on recurrent venous thrombosis and may have implications for future treatment and prevention strategies.
Authors: Michael B Streiff; Xiaobu Ye; Thomas S Kickler; Serena Desideri; Jayesh Jani; Joy Fisher; Stuart A Grossman Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2015-06-23 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Vikram Raghunathan; Patricia Liu; Tia C L Kohs; Ramin Amirsoltani; Michael Oakes; Owen J T McCarty; Sven R Olson; David Zonies; Joseph J Shatzel Journal: ASAIO J Date: 2021-08-01 Impact factor: 2.872