AIM OF THE STUDY: A biopsy is an essential step in the diagnostic cascade of malignant bone and soft tissue tumors. The objective is always the extraction of a representative tissue specimen in line with the approach for the definitive operation. The aim of this study therefore was to assess the diagnostic approaches regarding the biopsy of tumors in orthopedic centers in Germany. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In total 60 hospitals with an orthopedic focus on tumors were contacted and provided with a newly developed questionnaire with 13 items regarding biopsy technique, indication criteria, execution, supportive imaging and histopathological results. Evaluation of the responses was performed by means of binary systems and proportional consent to every answer possibility was calculated. RESULTS: The results of the questionnaire showed that open biopsies are performed in all centers and in 72 % of the hospitals percutaneous techniques are additionally applied. The most important criterion for an open or percutaneous procedure was the tumor location (80 %). The indications for either technique are assessed by a tumor orthopedic consultant in 68 % of the centers and special imaging is applied in 36 % of the institutions. The approach for the biopsy is defined by the orthopedic surgeon in 88 %. Percutanous biopsies are carried out by interventional radiologists in 60 % of the centers. Open biopsies are performed by residents under supervision by a tumor orthopedic consultant in 88 %. The histopathological results are discussed in 88 % of the hospitals in an interdisciplinary tumor board and in 64 % patients are informed about the diagnosis in an outpatient clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors is performed according to the guidelines in most institutions. Only small differences were identified regarding the definition of the surgical approach and the application of imaging techniques during biopsy.
AIM OF THE STUDY: A biopsy is an essential step in the diagnostic cascade of malignant bone and soft tissue tumors. The objective is always the extraction of a representative tissue specimen in line with the approach for the definitive operation. The aim of this study therefore was to assess the diagnostic approaches regarding the biopsy of tumors in orthopedic centers in Germany. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In total 60 hospitals with an orthopedic focus on tumors were contacted and provided with a newly developed questionnaire with 13 items regarding biopsy technique, indication criteria, execution, supportive imaging and histopathological results. Evaluation of the responses was performed by means of binary systems and proportional consent to every answer possibility was calculated. RESULTS: The results of the questionnaire showed that open biopsies are performed in all centers and in 72 % of the hospitals percutaneous techniques are additionally applied. The most important criterion for an open or percutaneous procedure was the tumor location (80 %). The indications for either technique are assessed by a tumor orthopedic consultant in 68 % of the centers and special imaging is applied in 36 % of the institutions. The approach for the biopsy is defined by the orthopedic surgeon in 88 %. Percutanous biopsies are carried out by interventional radiologists in 60 % of the centers. Open biopsies are performed by residents under supervision by a tumor orthopedic consultant in 88 %. The histopathological results are discussed in 88 % of the hospitals in an interdisciplinary tumor board and in 64 % patients are informed about the diagnosis in an outpatient clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors is performed according to the guidelines in most institutions. Only small differences were identified regarding the definition of the surgical approach and the application of imaging techniques during biopsy.