Literature DB >> 24145949

Operative management of ulnar collateral ligament insufficiency in adolescent athletes.

Kristofer J Jones1, Joshua S Dines, Brian J Rebolledo, Kenneth D Weeks, Riley J Williams, David M Dines, David W Altchek.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries of the elbow has increased in adolescents over the past decade because of widespread participation in athletics and heightened awareness among physicians. HYPOTHESIS: Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using the docking technique would result in a successful return to athletic activity in this age group. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: Study participants were 55 skeletally mature adolescent athletes (mean age, 17.6 years; range, 15-18 years) who underwent UCL reconstruction between 2008 and 2010. While the majority of patients were baseball players (n = 47), there were 3 gymnasts and 5 javelin throwers included in the study. Each patient underwent UCL reconstruction utilizing the docking technique after an adequate trial of nonoperative management (mean, 5.8 months). At the latest follow-up, patients were evaluated to determine their ability to return to athletic activity. Clinical outcomes were classified using the Conway scale, the Andrews-Timmerman score, and the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic (KJOC) score.
RESULTS: At a minimum 2-year follow-up, 87% (48/55) of patients had excellent results using the Conway scale. Overall, there were only 2 poor results (3.6%) that were observed in patients with concomitant osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the capitellum. There were 4 postoperative complications in 4 patients (2 gymnasts and 2 javelin throwers) who developed ulnar neuritis after UCL reconstruction. The mean Andrews-Timmerman score was 83.6 ± 7.2 (range, 30-100), and the mean KJOC score was 88.0 ± 6.0 (range, 40-100).
CONCLUSION: The docking technique results in favorable clinical outcomes in adolescent athletes with UCL insufficiency at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Patients with concomitant intra-articular lesions should be cautioned preoperatively that they might experience inferior clinical outcomes. Postoperatively, adolescent gymnasts and javelin throwers may be at an increased risk for transient paresthesia of the ulnar nerve caused by increased stress on the medial elbow.

Entities:  

Keywords:  UCL reconstruction; adolescent sports injuries; throwing elbow; ulnar collateral ligament

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24145949     DOI: 10.1177/0363546513507695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  18 in total

1.  Elbow ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction: clinical, radiographic, and ultrasound outcomes at a mean 3-year follow-up.

Authors:  G Merolla; S Del Sordo; P Paladini; G Porcellini
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2014-03-23

Review 2.  The History and Evolution of Elbow Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction: from Tommy John to 2020.

Authors:  Andrew R Jensen; Matthew D LaPrade; Travis W Turner; Joshua S Dines; Christopher L Camp
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-06

Review 3.  Return to Sport and Sports-Specific Outcomes Following Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Adolescent Athletes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Georgina Glogovac; Rafael Kakazu; Alexander Constantine Aretakis; Brian M Grawe
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-06-11

4.  Pitch Characteristics Before Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Major League Pitchers Compared With Age-Matched Controls.

Authors:  John Prodromo; Nimit Patel; Neil Kumar; Kevin Denehy; Loni Philip Tabb; James Tom
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2016-06-14

5.  Do Clinical Results and Return-to-Sport Rates After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Differ Based on Graft Choice and Surgical Technique?

Authors:  Brandon J Erickson; Gregory L Cvetanovich; Rachel M Frank; Bernard R Bach; Mark S Cohen; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Brian J Cole; Anthony A Romeo
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2016-11-10

6.  Reasons for Retirement Following Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Among Major League Baseball Pitchers.

Authors:  Brandon J Erickson; Junyoung Ahn; Peter N Chalmers; Christopher S Ahmad; Bernard R Bach; Nikhil N Verma; Anthony A Romeo
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-12-21

7.  Outcomes and Return to Sport After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Adolescent Baseball Players.

Authors:  Michael Saper; Joseph Shung; Stephanie Pearce; Viviana Bompadre; James R Andrews
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-04-19

Review 8.  Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction: Anatomy, Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Brandon J Erickson; Joshua D Harris; Peter N Chalmers; Bernard R Bach; Nikhil N Verma; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Anthony A Romeo
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.843

9.  Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction of the Elbow: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Brandon J Erickson; Peter N Chalmers; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Nikhil N Verma; Anthony A Romeo
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2015-12-09

10.  Primary Repair of Proximal Ulnar Collateral Ligament Ruptures in Pediatric Overhead Athletes.

Authors:  Lafi S Khalil; Austin G Cross; Felix H Savoie; Eric C Makhni
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2020-05-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.