PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to characterise the utilization of the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues exenatide and liraglutide in Denmark. METHODS: From the Danish National Prescription Registry, we extracted all prescriptions for either liraglutide or exenatide twice-daily in the period 1 April 2007 to 31 December 2012. Using descriptive statistics, we calculated incidence rates, prevalence proportions, daily consumption, and concomitant drug use. For a subset of users we included data from other registries and characterised the baseline characteristics of incident users of GLP-1 analogues. RESULTS: We identified 21,561 and 2,354 users of liraglutide and exenatide respectively. From market entry in 2009 liraglutide showed an increasing prevalence reaching 2.4 per thousand inhabitants in 2012. Exenatide ranged between 0.01 and 0.25 per thousand inhabitants from 2007 to 2012. Treatment intensity showed geographical variation ranging from 1.84per thousand inhabitants to 3.22 per thousand inhabitants for liraglutide. Average doses were 1.34 mg/day (liraglutide) and 16.4 μg/day (exenatide). Treatment initiation was most often performed by a hospital physician and was not associated with any changes in concomitant treatment with antihypertensives, cholesterol-lowering drugs or anticoagulants. Of liraglutide and exenatide users, 38 % and 43 % also used insulin. Low kidney function (eGFR < 30 ml/min) was found in 10.1 % and 9.0 % of users of liraglutide and exenatide respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The preferred GLP-1 analogue in Denmark is liraglutide. Certain aspects of the utilization of GLP-1 analogues, such as large regional differences and concomitant use of GLP-1 analogues and insulin, warrant further investigation.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to characterise the utilization of the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues exenatide and liraglutide in Denmark. METHODS: From the Danish National Prescription Registry, we extracted all prescriptions for either liraglutide or exenatide twice-daily in the period 1 April 2007 to 31 December 2012. Using descriptive statistics, we calculated incidence rates, prevalence proportions, daily consumption, and concomitant drug use. For a subset of users we included data from other registries and characterised the baseline characteristics of incident users of GLP-1 analogues. RESULTS: We identified 21,561 and 2,354 users of liraglutide and exenatide respectively. From market entry in 2009 liraglutide showed an increasing prevalence reaching 2.4 per thousand inhabitants in 2012. Exenatide ranged between 0.01 and 0.25 per thousand inhabitants from 2007 to 2012. Treatment intensity showed geographical variation ranging from 1.84per thousand inhabitants to 3.22 per thousand inhabitants for liraglutide. Average doses were 1.34 mg/day (liraglutide) and 16.4 μg/day (exenatide). Treatment initiation was most often performed by a hospital physician and was not associated with any changes in concomitant treatment with antihypertensives, cholesterol-lowering drugs or anticoagulants. Of liraglutide and exenatide users, 38 % and 43 % also used insulin. Low kidney function (eGFR < 30 ml/min) was found in 10.1 % and 9.0 % of users of liraglutide and exenatide respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The preferred GLP-1 analogue in Denmark is liraglutide. Certain aspects of the utilization of GLP-1 analogues, such as large regional differences and concomitant use of GLP-1 analogues and insulin, warrant further investigation.
Authors: Ronan Roussel; Florence Travert; Blandine Pasquet; Peter W F Wilson; Sidney C Smith; Shinya Goto; Philippe Ravaud; Michel Marre; Avi Porath; Deepak L Bhatt; P Gabriel Steg Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2010-11-22
Authors: John B Buse; David C Klonoff; Loretta L Nielsen; Xuesong Guan; Christopher L Bowlus; John H Holcombe; David G Maggs; Matthew E Wintle Journal: Clin Ther Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 3.393
Authors: Bernard Zinman; Byron J Hoogwerf; Santiago Durán García; Denái R Milton; Joseph M Giaconia; Dennis D Kim; Michael E Trautmann; Robert G Brodows Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2007-04-03 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: John B Buse; Robert R Henry; Jenny Han; Dennis D Kim; Mark S Fineman; Alain D Baron Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Ralph A DeFronzo; Robert E Ratner; Jenny Han; Dennis D Kim; Mark S Fineman; Alain D Baron Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: David M Kendall; Matthew C Riddle; Julio Rosenstock; Dongliang Zhuang; Dennis D Kim; Mark S Fineman; Alain D Baron Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Richard E Pratley; Michael Nauck; Timothy Bailey; Eduard Montanya; Robert Cuddihy; Sebastiano Filetti; Anne Bloch Thomsen; Rie Elvang Søndergaard; Melanie Davies Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-04-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Reimar W Thomsen; Lisbeth M Baggesen; Mette Søgaard; Lars Pedersen; Helene Nørrelund; Esben S Buhl; Christiane L Haase; Søren P Johnsen Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2015-08-16 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Giuseppe Roberto; Anna Girardi; Francesco Barone-Adesi; Alessandro Pecere; Valentina Ientile; Claudia Bartolini; Roberto Da Cas; Stefania Spila-Alegiani; Carmen Ferrajolo; Paolo Francesconi; Gianluca Trifirò; Elisabetta Poluzzi; Fabio Baccetti; Rosa Gini Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2022-05-30 Impact factor: 5.988
Authors: Jakob S Knudsen; Lisbeth M Baggesen; Maria Lajer; Larisa Nurkanovic; Anastasia Ustyugova; Henrik T Sørensen; Reimar W Thomsen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-03-04 Impact factor: 3.240