Literature DB >> 24145724

Computational models predict larger muscle tissue strains at faster sprinting speeds.

Niccolo M Fiorentino1, Michael R Rehorn, Elizabeth S Chumanov, Darryl G Thelen, Silvia S Blemker.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Proximal biceps femoris musculotendon strain injury has been well established as a common injury among athletes participating in sports that require sprinting near or at maximum speed; however, little is known about the mechanisms that make this muscle tissue more susceptible to injury at faster speeds.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to quantify localized tissue strain during sprinting at a range of speeds.
METHODS: Biceps femoris long head (BFlh) musculotendon dimensions of 14 athletes were measured on magnetic resonance (MR) images and used to generate a finite-element computational model. The model was first validated through comparison with previous dynamic MR experiments. After validation, muscle activation and muscle-tendon unit length change were derived from forward dynamic simulations of sprinting at 70%, 85%, and 100% maximum speed and used as input to the computational model simulations. Simulations ran from midswing to foot contact.
RESULTS: The model predictions of local muscle tissue strain magnitude compared favorably with in vivo tissue strain measurements determined from dynamic MR experiments of the BFlh. For simulations of sprinting, local fiber strain was nonuniform at all speeds, with the highest muscle tissue strain where injury is often observed (proximal myotendinous junction). At faster sprinting speeds, increases were observed in fiber strain nonuniformity and peak local fiber strain (0.56, 0.67, and 0.72 for sprinting at 70%, 85%, and 100% maximum speed). A histogram of local fiber strains showed that more of the BFlh reached larger local fiber strains at faster speeds.
CONCLUSIONS: At faster sprinting speeds, peak local fiber strain, fiber strain nonuniformity, and the amount of muscle undergoing larger strains are predicted to increase, likely contributing to the BFlh muscle's higher injury susceptibility at faster speeds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24145724      PMCID: PMC3960352          DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  49 in total

1.  Hamstrings are most susceptible to injury during the early stance phase of sprinting.

Authors:  John W Orchard
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2011-09-18       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Muscle architecture variations along the human semitendinosus and biceps femoris (long head) length.

Authors:  Eleftherios Kellis; Nikiforos Galanis; Konstantinos Natsis; George Kapetanos
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 2.368

3.  Medial gastrocnemius muscle behavior during human running and walking.

Authors:  M Ishikawa; J Pakaslahti; P V Komi
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Distinct muscle fascicle length changes in feline medial gastrocnemius and soleus muscles during slope walking.

Authors:  Huub Maas; Robert J Gregor; Emma F Hodson-Tole; Brad J Farrell; Boris I Prilutsky
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2009-01-22

5.  Hamstrings are most susceptible to injury during the late swing phase of sprinting.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Chumanov; Anthony G Schache; Bryan C Heiderscheit; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Functional differences in the activity of the hamstring muscles with increasing running speed.

Authors:  Ayako Higashihara; Takashi Ono; Jun Kubota; Toru Okuwaki; Toru Fukubayashi
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.337

7.  A Magnetic Resonance-Compatible Loading Device for Dynamically Imaging Shortening and Lengthening Muscle Contraction Mechanics.

Authors:  Amy Silder; Christopher J Westphal; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  J Med Device       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 0.582

8.  Activation and aponeurosis morphology affect in vivo muscle tissue strains near the myotendinous junction.

Authors:  Niccolo M Fiorentino; Frederick H Epstein; Silvia S Blemker
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Functional adaptability of muscle fibers to long-term resistance exercise.

Authors:  Todd C Shoepe; Julian E Stelzer; Dena P Garner; Jeffrey J Widrick
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Muscle damage is not a function of muscle force but active muscle strain.

Authors:  R L Lieber; J Fridén
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1993-02
View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Does Muscle-Tendon Unit Structure Predispose to Hamstring Strain Injury During Running? A Critical Review.

Authors:  Shaun Huygaerts; Francesc Cos; Daniel D Cohen; Julio Calleja-González; Ricard Pruna; Pedro E Alcaraz; Anthony J Blazevich
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  In Silico and In Vivo Studies Detect Functional Repair Mechanisms in a Volumetric Muscle Loss Injury.

Authors:  Juliana A Passipieri; Xiao Hu; Ellen Mintz; Jack Dienes; Hannah B Baker; C Hunter Wallace; Silvia S Blemker; George J Christ
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Musculotendon variability influences tissue strains experienced by the biceps femoris long head muscle during high-speed running.

Authors:  Niccolo M Fiorentino; Silvia S Blemker
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  A 3D model of the soleus reveals effects of aponeuroses morphology and material properties on complex muscle fascicle behavior.

Authors:  Katherine R Knaus; Geoffrey G Handsfield; Silvia S Blemker
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  SPRINT PERFORMANCE IN FOOTBALL (SOCCER) PLAYERS WITH AND WITHOUT A PREVIOUS HAMSTRING STRAIN INJURY: AN EXPLORATIVE CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY.

Authors:  Lasse Ishøi; Kristian Thorborg; Per Hölmich; Kasper Krommes
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-12

6.  Hamstring Architectural and Functional Adaptations Following Long vs. Short Muscle Length Eccentric Training.

Authors:  Kenny Guex; Francis Degache; Cynthia Morisod; Matthieu Sailly; Gregoire P Millet
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Enhanced Strength and Sprint Levels, and Changes in Blood Parameters during a Complete Athletics Season in 800 m High-Level Athletes.

Authors:  Beatriz Bachero-Mena; Fernando Pareja-Blanco; Juan J González-Badillo
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Salivary Hormones Response to Preparation and Pre-competitive Training of World-class Level Athletes.

Authors:  Gaël Guilhem; Christine Hanon; Nicolas Gendreau; Dominique Bonneau; Arnaud Guével; Mounir Chennaoui
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 9.  Skeletal muscle mechanics, energetics and plasticity.

Authors:  Richard L Lieber; Thomas J Roberts; Silvia S Blemker; Sabrina S M Lee; Walter Herzog
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Reference data on thickness and mechanics of tissue layers and anthropometry of musculoskeletal extremities.

Authors:  Erica E Neumann; Tammy M Owings; Tyler Schimmoeller; Tara F Nagle; Robb W Colbrunn; Benjamin Landis; J Eric Jelovsek; Mike Wong; Joy P Ku; Ahmet Erdemir
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 6.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.