Literature DB >> 24145649

Frequent expression of napsin A in clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium: potential diagnostic utility.

Oluwole Fadare1, Mohamed M Desouki, Katja Gwin, Krisztina Z Hanley, Elke A Jarboe, Sharon X Liang, Charles M Quick, Wenxin Zheng, Vinita Parkash, Jonathan L Hecht.   

Abstract

The histotyping of high-grade endometrial carcinomas with clear cells may be subject to significant interobserver variability, which suggests that a biomarker that can distinguish endometrial clear cell carcinoma (CCC) from its mimics would be of diagnostic utility. This study assessed the usefulness of napsin A immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of CCC, on the basis of an analysis of 77 cases diagnosed as such at 9 institutions. After being independently reviewed by a subset of 3 pathologists, cases for which there was diagnostic consensus among all 3 reviewers in agreement with the primary contributor (n=60) were used to establish a "consensus group" that served as a gold standard relative to which napsin A performance was assessed. Duplicate, 1.0-mm-core tissue microarrays were constructed from the 54 cases in the consensus group for which requisite materials were available, as well as from 49 endometrial endometrioid carcinomas (all grades) and 17 endometrial serous carcinomas. Napsin A immunohistochemical analysis was performed on the microarrays and on the 17 cases for which there was no diagnostic consensus, with scoring based on the proportion of immunoreactive cells (0, 1+, 2+, and 3+ indicative of 0, 1% to 25%, 26% to 49%, and ≥50% immunoreactive cells, respectively). The distribution of scores for the 49 CCC cases with evaluable cores was as follows: 0, n=6; 1+, n=6; 2+, n=8; 3+, n=29. Among the evaluable cases, the frequency of ≥1+ napsin A immunoreactivity was significantly higher in CCCs (43/49, 88%) than in endometrial serous carcinomas (1/13, 7.7%; P<0.0001) and endometrial endometrioid carcinomas (0/49, 0%; P<0.0001). The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of ≥1+ napsin A expression in predicting the consensus clear cell histotype were 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.95), 0.98 (95% CI, 0.9-1), 0.91 (95% CI, 0.86-0.96), and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.86-1), respectively. Napsin A expression was not associated with survival or clinicopathologic factors. In the group of cases without diagnostic consensus for CCC, 50% showed ≥1+ napsin A expression; all napsin A-negative cases had previously been classified as non-CCC by ≥2 reviewers, whereas only 37.5% of the napsin A-positive cases had been classified as CCC by 2 of the 3 reviewers. In conclusion, napsin A is a sensitive and specific biomarker of the clear cell histotype in endometrial carcinomas and accordingly may have diagnostic utility in their histotyping.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24145649     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  17 in total

1.  Utility of α-methylacyl-coenzyme-A racemase (p504s) immunohistochemistry in distinguishing endometrial clear cell carcinomas from serous and endometrioid carcinomas.

Authors:  Oluwole Fadare; Vinita Parkash; Katja Gwin; Krisztina Z Hanley; Elke A Jarboe; Sharon X Liang; Charles M Quick; Wenxin Zheng; Kojo R Rawish; Jonathan L Hecht; Mohamed M Desouki
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.466

2.  Diagnostic Algorithmic Proposal Based on Comprehensive Immunohistochemical Evaluation of 297 Invasive Endocervical Adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Simona Stolnicu; Iulia Barsan; Lien Hoang; Prusha Patel; Luis Chiriboga; Cristina Terinte; Anna Pesci; Sarit Aviel-Ronen; Takako Kiyokawa; Isabel Alvarado-Cabrero; Malcolm C Pike; Esther Oliva; Kay J Park; Robert A Soslow
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 3.  [New features in the 2014 WHO classification of uterine neoplasms].

Authors:  S F Lax
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 4.  The evolution of endometrial carcinoma classification through application of immunohistochemistry and molecular diagnostics: past, present and future.

Authors:  Emily A Goebel; August Vidal; Xavier Matias-Guiu; C Blake Gilks
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 5.  Practical issues in the diagnosis of serous carcinoma of the endometrium.

Authors:  Sonia Gatius; Xavier Matias-Guiu
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 6.  How to approach the many faces of endometrioid carcinoma.

Authors:  Anais Malpica
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 7.  Benign endometrial proliferations mimicking malignancies: a review of problematic entities in small biopsy specimens.

Authors:  Philip Pun-Ching Ip
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Molecular Analysis of Mixed Endometrial Carcinomas Shows Clonality in Most Cases.

Authors:  Martin Köbel; Bo Meng; Lien N Hoang; Noorah Almadani; Xiaodong Li; Robert A Soslow; C Blake Gilks; Cheng-Han Lee
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.394

9.  Diagnostic value of dual detection of hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 beta (HNF-1β) and napsin A for diagnosing ovarian clear cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Qing Li; Xin Zeng; Xue Cheng; Jingmin Zhang; Jie Ji; Jinsong Wang; Kemei Xiong; Qiong Qi; Wenbin Huang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-07-01

10.  Napsin A is a specific marker for ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yoriko Yamashita; Tetsuro Nagasaka; Aya Naiki-Ito; Shinya Sato; Shugo Suzuki; Shinya Toyokuni; Masafumi Ito; Satoru Takahashi
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 7.842

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.