INTRODUCTION: To better meet the needs of older adults in the emergency department, Senior Friendly care processes, such as high-risk screening are recommended. The identification of Seniors at Risk (ISAR) tool is a 6-item validated screening tool for identifying elderly patients at risk of the adverse outcomes post-ED visit. This paper describes the implementation of the tool in the Mount Sinai Hospital emergency department using a Plan-Do-Study-Act model; and demonstrates whether the tool predicts adverse outcomes. METHODS: An observational study tracked tool implementation. A retrospective chart audit was completed to collect data about elderly ED patients during 2 time periods in 2010 and 2011. Data analysis compared the characteristics of patients with positive and negative screening tool results. RESULTS: The identification of Seniors at Risk tool was completed for 51.6% of eligible patients, with 61.2% of patients having a positive result. Patients with positive screening results were more likely to be over age 79 (P = .003); be admitted to hospital (P < .001); have a longer mean ED length of stay (P < .001). For patients admitted to hospital, those with positive screening results had a longer mean inpatient stay (P = .012). DISCUSSION: Implementing the Idenfitication of Seniors at Risk tool was challenged by problematic compliance with tool completion. Strategies to address this included tool adaptation; and providing staff with knowledge of ED and inpatient geriatric resources and feedback on completion rates. Positive screening results predicted adverse outcomes in elderly Mount Sinai Hospital ED patients.
INTRODUCTION: To better meet the needs of older adults in the emergency department, Senior Friendly care processes, such as high-risk screening are recommended. The identification of Seniors at Risk (ISAR) tool is a 6-item validated screening tool for identifying elderly patients at risk of the adverse outcomes post-ED visit. This paper describes the implementation of the tool in the Mount Sinai Hospital emergency department using a Plan-Do-Study-Act model; and demonstrates whether the tool predicts adverse outcomes. METHODS: An observational study tracked tool implementation. A retrospective chart audit was completed to collect data about elderly ED patients during 2 time periods in 2010 and 2011. Data analysis compared the characteristics of patients with positive and negative screening tool results. RESULTS: The identification of Seniors at Risk tool was completed for 51.6% of eligible patients, with 61.2% of patients having a positive result. Patients with positive screening results were more likely to be over age 79 (P = .003); be admitted to hospital (P < .001); have a longer mean ED length of stay (P < .001). For patients admitted to hospital, those with positive screening results had a longer mean inpatient stay (P = .012). DISCUSSION: Implementing the Idenfitication of Seniors at Risk tool was challenged by problematic compliance with tool completion. Strategies to address this included tool adaptation; and providing staff with knowledge of ED and inpatient geriatric resources and feedback on completion rates. Positive screening results predicted adverse outcomes in elderly Mount Sinai Hospital ED patients.
Authors: Lauren T Southerland; Katherine M Hunold; Jenifer Van Fossen; Jeffrey M Caterino; Peg Gulker; Julie A Stephens; Jason J Bischof; Erin Farrell; Christopher R Carpenter; Lorraine C Mion Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-09-27 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Anne-Carina Scharf; Janine Gronewold; Christian Dahlmann; Jeanina Schlitzer; Andreas Kribben; Guido Gerken; Tienush Rassaf; Christoph Kleinschnitz; Richard Dodel; Helmut Frohnhofen; Dirk M Hermann Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2019-08-14 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Laura C Blomaard; Simon P Mooijaart; Shanti Bolt; Jacinta A Lucke; Jelle de Gelder; Anja M Booijen; Jacobijn Gussekloo; Bas de Groot Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Laura C Blomaard; Bas de Groot; Jacinta A Lucke; Jelle de Gelder; Anja M Booijen; Jacobijn Gussekloo; Simon P Mooijaart Journal: Z Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 1.281
Authors: Tasheen Wissanji; Marie-France Forget; John Muscedere; Dominique Beaudin; Richard Coveney; Han Ting Wang Journal: Crit Care Explor Date: 2022-03-31