Literature DB >> 24144575

Anaphylaxis in America: the prevalence and characteristics of anaphylaxis in the United States.

Robert A Wood1, Carlos A Camargo2, Philip Lieberman3, Hugh A Sampson4, Lawrence B Schwartz5, Myron Zitt6, Charlotte Collins7, Michael Tringale7, Marilyn Wilkinson8, John Boyle9, F Estelle R Simons10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although anaphylaxis is recognized as an important life-threatening condition, data are limited regarding its prevalence and characteristics in the general population.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to estimate the lifetime prevalence and overall characteristics of anaphylaxis.
METHODS: Two nationwide, cross-sectional random-digit-dial surveys were conducted. The public survey included unselected adults, whereas the patient survey captured information from household members reporting a prior reaction to medications, foods, insect stings, or latex and idiopathic reactions in the previous 10 years. In both surveys standardized questionnaires queried anaphylaxis symptoms, treatments, knowledge, and behaviors.
RESULTS: The public survey included 1,000 adults, of whom 7.7% (95% CI, 5.7% to 9.7%) reported a prior anaphylactic reaction. Using increasingly stringent criteria, we estimate that 5.1% (95% CI, 3.4% to 6.8%) and 1.6% (95% CI, 0.8% to 2.4%) had probable and very likely anaphylaxis, respectively. The patient survey included 1,059 respondents, of whom 344 reported a history of anaphylaxis. The most common triggers reported were medications (34%), foods (31%), and insect stings (20%). Forty-two percent sought treatment within 15 minutes of onset, 34% went to the hospital, 27% self-treated with antihistamines, 10% called 911, 11% self-administered epinephrine, and 6.4% received no treatment. Although most respondents with anaphylaxis reported 2 or more prior episodes (19% reporting ≥5 episodes), 52% had never received a self-injectable epinephrine prescription, and 60% did not currently have epinephrine available.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of anaphylaxis in the general population is at least 1.6% and probably higher. Patients do not appear adequately equipped to deal with future episodes, indicating the need for public health initiatives to improve anaphylaxis recognition and treatment.
Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anaphylaxis; RDD; Random-digit-dial; epinephrine; prevalence

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24144575     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  79 in total

1.  Use of enoximone in management of anaphylaxis complicated by labetalol use.

Authors:  Sophie Hayhoe; Vilas Navapurkar; Andrew Conway Morris
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-10-26

Review 2.  The Epidemiology of Anaphylaxis.

Authors:  Joyce E Yu; Robert Y Lin
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 8.667

3.  Biphasic and protracted anaphylaxis to iodinated contrast media.

Authors:  Tae-Hyung Kim; Soon Ho Yoon; Suh-Young Lee; Young Hun Choi; Chang Min Park; Hye-Ryun Kang; Sang-Heon Cho
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  The Role of KIT Mutations in Anaphylaxis.

Authors:  Elise Coulson; Sherry Zhou; Cem Akin
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 5.  Exercise-Induced Anaphylaxis: Literature Review and Recent Updates.

Authors:  Matthew P Giannetti
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 6.  Anaphylaxis.

Authors:  Daniel LoVerde; Onyinye I Iweala; Ariana Eginli; Guha Krishnaswamy
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Food entries in a large allergy data repository.

Authors:  Joseph M Plasek; Foster R Goss; Kenneth H Lai; Jason J Lau; Diane L Seger; Kimberly G Blumenthal; Paige G Wickner; Sarah P Slight; Frank Y Chang; Maxim Topaz; David W Bates; Li Zhou
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  CD33 recruitment inhibits IgE-mediated anaphylaxis and desensitizes mast cells to allergen.

Authors:  Shiteng Duan; Cynthia J Koziol-White; William F Jester; Scott A Smith; Corwin M Nycholat; Matthew S Macauley; Reynold A Panettieri; James C Paulson
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 9.  Delayed anaphylaxis to red meat masquerading as idiopathic anaphylaxis.

Authors:  Anubha Tripathi; Scott P Commins; Peter W Heymann; Thomas A E Platts-Mills
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2014 May-Jun

Review 10.  Food-Induced Anaphylaxis: an Update.

Authors:  Christopher P Parrish; Heidi Kim
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 4.806

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.