BACKGROUND: The emerging evidence of the effects of sedentary time on health outcomes suggests a need to better measure this exposure. Healthcare settings, however, are not equipped with a tool that can quickly assess the sedentary habits of their patient population. The purpose of this study was to validate a tool for rapidly quantifying and tracking the sedentary time and low levels of daily lifestyle physical activity among primary care patients. METHODS: The study examined the test-retest reliability and validity of the rapid assessment disuse index (RADI) among adult patients from a large primary care clinic. Patients completed RADI (comprised of 3 items: sitting, moving and stair climbing) twice, followed by accelerometer monitoring. Test-retest reliability was computed, and the correlation between survey responses and accelerometry was determined. A receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. RESULTS: RADI was temporally stable (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.79), and a higher score was significantly correlated with greater sedentary time (ρ=0.40; p<0.01), fewer sedentary to active transitions (ρ=-0.42; p<0.01), and less light-intensity physical activity (ρ=-0.40; p<0.01). The ability of RADI to detect patients with high levels of sedentary time was fair (AUC=0.72). CONCLUSIONS: This brief assessment tool, designed to quickly identify patients with high levels of sitting and low daily physical activity, exhibits good reliability and moderate validity. RADI can assist in providing recommendations at the point of care pertaining to modifying sedentary behaviour.
BACKGROUND: The emerging evidence of the effects of sedentary time on health outcomes suggests a need to better measure this exposure. Healthcare settings, however, are not equipped with a tool that can quickly assess the sedentary habits of their patient population. The purpose of this study was to validate a tool for rapidly quantifying and tracking the sedentary time and low levels of daily lifestyle physical activity among primary care patients. METHODS: The study examined the test-retest reliability and validity of the rapid assessment disuse index (RADI) among adult patients from a large primary care clinic. Patients completed RADI (comprised of 3 items: sitting, moving and stair climbing) twice, followed by accelerometer monitoring. Test-retest reliability was computed, and the correlation between survey responses and accelerometry was determined. A receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. RESULTS: RADI was temporally stable (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.79), and a higher score was significantly correlated with greater sedentary time (ρ=0.40; p<0.01), fewer sedentary to active transitions (ρ=-0.42; p<0.01), and less light-intensity physical activity (ρ=-0.40; p<0.01). The ability of RADI to detect patients with high levels of sedentary time was fair (AUC=0.72). CONCLUSIONS: This brief assessment tool, designed to quickly identify patients with high levels of sitting and low daily physical activity, exhibits good reliability and moderate validity. RADI can assist in providing recommendations at the point of care pertaining to modifying sedentary behaviour.
Entities:
Keywords:
Physical activity measurement; Physical activity promotion in primary care
Authors: Kerem Shuval; Loretta DiPietro; Celette Sugg Skinner; Carolyn E Barlow; Jay Morrow; Robert Goldsteen; Harold W Kohl Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2012-09-13 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Ruth E Taylor-Piliae; Linda C Norton; William L Haskell; Mohammed H Mahbouda; Joan M Fair; Carlos Iribarren; Mark A Hlatky; Alan S Go; Stephen P Fortmann Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2006-07-13 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Anna Puig-Ribera; Carlos Martín-Cantera; Elisa Puigdomenech; Jordi Real; Montserrat Romaguera; José Félix Magdalena-Belio; Jose Ignacio Recio-Rodríguez; Beatriz Rodriguez-Martin; Maria Soledad Arietaleanizbeaskoa; Irene Repiso-Gento; Luis Garcia-Ortiz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-09-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Roberto M Benzo; Allene L Gremaud; Matthew Jerome; Lucas J Carr Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-08-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Maria T Sanchez Santos; Esther Williamson; Julie Bruce; Lesley Ward; Christian D Mallen; Angela Garrett; Alana Morris; Sarah E Lamb Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-09-03 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Gregory Knell; Kelley Pettee Gabriel; Michael S Businelle; Kerem Shuval; David W Wetter; Darla E Kendzor Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-07-18 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Esther Williamson; Lesley Ward; Karan Vadher; Susan J Dutton; Ben Parker; Stavros Petrou; Charles E Hutchinson; Richard Gagen; Nigel K Arden; Karen Barker; Graham Boniface; Julie Bruce; Gary Collins; Jeremy Fairbank; Judith Fitch; David P French; Angela Garrett; Varsha Gandhi; Frances Griffiths; Zara Hansen; Christian Mallen; Alana Morris; Sarah E Lamb Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-10-18 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Lena V Kallings; Sven J G Olsson; Örjan Ekblom; Elin Ekblom-Bak; Mats Börjesson Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-28 Impact factor: 3.390