Literature DB >> 24144528

Comparison of clinical outcomes and toxicity in endometrial cancer patients treated with adjuvant intensity-modulated radiation therapy or conventional radiotherapy.

Chien-Chih Chen1, Lily Wang2, Chien-Hsing Lu3, Jin-Ching Lin1, Jian-Sheng Jan1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the treatment outcomes and toxicity in endometrial cancer patients treated with hysterectomy and adjuvant intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or conventional radiotherapy (CRT).
METHODS: There were 101 patients with stage IA-IIIC2 endometrial carcinoma treated with hysterectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy. In total, 36 patients received adjuvant CRT and 65 were treated with adjuvant IMRT. The endpoints were overall survival, local failure-free survival, and disease-free survival. Patients were assessed for acute toxicity weekly according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. Late toxicity was evaluated according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Schema.
RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival, local failure-free survival, and disease-free survival for the CRT group and the IMRT group were 82.9% versus 93.5% (p = 0.26), 93.7% versus 89.3% (p = 0.68), and 88.0% versus 82.8% (p = 0.83), respectively. Four (11.1%) patients had Grade 3 or greater acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity and three (8.3%) patients had Grade 3 or greater acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity in the CRT group, whereas four (6.2%) patients had Grade 3 or greater acute GI toxicity in the IMRT group and no patient had severe GU toxicity. There was one (2.8%) patient who had Grade 3 or greater late GI toxicity and one (2.8%) patient had Grade 3 or greater late GU toxicity in the CRT group, whereas no patient had severe GI or GU toxicity in the IMRT group.
CONCLUSION: Adjuvant IMRT for endometrial cancer patients had comparable clinical outcomes with CRT and had less acute and late toxicity.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conventional radiotherapy; endometrial cancer; intensity-modulated radiation therapy; toxicity

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24144528     DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2013.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc        ISSN: 0929-6646            Impact factor:   3.282


  2 in total

1.  Para-aortic and pelvic extended-field radiotherapy for advanced-stage uterine cancer: dosimetric and toxicity comparison between the four-field box and intensity-modulated techniques.

Authors:  A Rabinovich; L Bernard; A V Ramanakumar; G Stroian; W H Gotlieb; S Lau; B Bahoric
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Proton Therapy Reduces Normal Tissue Dose in Extended-Field Pelvic Radiation for Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Melody J Xu; Alisha Maity; Jennifer Vogel; Maura Kirk; Huifang Zhai; Stefan Both; Lilie L Lin
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-03-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.