PURPOSE: To evaluate wide-field fundus autofluorescence (FAF) in patients with uveitis with retinal or chorioretinal involvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 78 study eyes in this prospective study. Best-corrected visual acuity, a full clinical examination, wide-field green-light FAF and composite color, green and red laser separation fundus imaging with Optomap SLO were performed. In a systematic analysis, the number, extension and margins of central and peripheral retinal or chorioretinal alterations, scars and infiltrates in infectious and non-infectious uveitic study eyes were evaluated. Wide-field FAF and color fundus imaging results were compared regarding their diagnostic properties. RESULTS: Nine out of 78 study eyes were diagnosed with infectious, 69 cases with non-infectious uveitis. Six infectious uveitic study eyes had changes of the peripheral fundus compared with 48 of 69 non-infectious uveitic eyes. In 33 (infectious versus non-infectious: 4 versus 29) cases, wide-field FAF images revealed more retinal or chorioretinal alterations or pathologies with a farther extended demarcation than wide-field composite color fundus imaging. Eleven out of 69 non-infectious study eyes were diagnosed with vasculitis which could be more precisely evaluated with wide-field FAF than wide-field composite color, green or red light filtered fundus imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Non-invasive wide-field FAF detects more retinal or chorioretinal involvement in patients with posterior uveitis than seen in color imaging and thus is useful in diagnosis and follow-up of uveitic patients.
PURPOSE: To evaluate wide-field fundus autofluorescence (FAF) in patients with uveitis with retinal or chorioretinal involvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 78 study eyes in this prospective study. Best-corrected visual acuity, a full clinical examination, wide-field green-light FAF and composite color, green and red laser separation fundus imaging with Optomap SLO were performed. In a systematic analysis, the number, extension and margins of central and peripheral retinal or chorioretinal alterations, scars and infiltrates in infectious and non-infectious uveitic study eyes were evaluated. Wide-field FAF and color fundus imaging results were compared regarding their diagnostic properties. RESULTS: Nine out of 78 study eyes were diagnosed with infectious, 69 cases with non-infectious uveitis. Six infectious uveitic study eyes had changes of the peripheral fundus compared with 48 of 69 non-infectious uveitic eyes. In 33 (infectious versus non-infectious: 4 versus 29) cases, wide-field FAF images revealed more retinal or chorioretinal alterations or pathologies with a farther extended demarcation than wide-field composite color fundus imaging. Eleven out of 69 non-infectious study eyes were diagnosed with vasculitis which could be more precisely evaluated with wide-field FAF than wide-field composite color, green or red light filtered fundus imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Non-invasive wide-field FAF detects more retinal or chorioretinal involvement in patients with posterior uveitis than seen in color imaging and thus is useful in diagnosis and follow-up of uveitic patients.
Authors: Mohamed G A Saleh; John Peter Campbell; Paul Yang; Phoebe Lin Journal: Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 1.300
Authors: Florian Seidensticker; Lukas Reznicek; Thomas Mann; Irene Hübert; Anselm Kampik; Michael Ulbig; Christoph Hirneiss; Aljoscha S Neubauer; Marcus Kernt Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2014-06-27