CONTEXT: Whereas guidelines about return-to-play (RTP) after concussion have been published, actual prognoses remain elusive. OBJECTIVE: To develop probability estimates for time until RTP after sport-related concussion. DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiology study. SETTING: High school. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Injured high school varsity, junior varsity, or freshman athletes who participated in 1 of 13 interscholastic sports at 7 area high schools during the 2007-2009 academic years. INTERVENTION(S): Athletic trainers employed at each school collected concussion data. The athletic trainer or physician on site determined the presence of a concussion. Athlete-exposures for practices and games also were captured. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Documented concussions were categorized by time missed from participation using severity outcome intervals (same-day return, 1- to 2-day return, 3- to 6-day return, 7- to 9-day return, 10- to 21-day return, >21-day return, no return [censored data]). We calculated Kaplan-Meier time-to-event probabilities that included censored data to determine the probability of RTP at each of these time intervals. RESULTS: A total of 81 new concussions were documented in 478 775 athlete-exposures during the study period. After a new concussion, the probability of RTP (95% confidence interval) was 2.5% (95% confidence interval = 0.3, 6.9) for a 1- to 2-day return, 71.3% (95% confidence interval = 59.0, 82.9) for a 7- to 9-day return, and 88.8% (95% confidence interval = 72.0, 97.2) for a 10- to 21-day return. CONCLUSIONS: For high school athletes, RTP within the first 2 days after concussion was unlikely. After 1 week, the probability of return rose substantially (approximately 71%). Prognostic indicators are used to educate patients about the likely course of disease. Whereas individual symptoms and recovery times vary, prognostic time-to-event probabilities allow clinicians to provide coaches, parents, and athletes with a prediction of the likelihood of RTP within certain timeframes after a concussion.
CONTEXT: Whereas guidelines about return-to-play (RTP) after concussion have been published, actual prognoses remain elusive. OBJECTIVE: To develop probability estimates for time until RTP after sport-related concussion. DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiology study. SETTING: High school. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Injured high school varsity, junior varsity, or freshman athletes who participated in 1 of 13 interscholastic sports at 7 area high schools during the 2007-2009 academic years. INTERVENTION(S): Athletic trainers employed at each school collected concussion data. The athletic trainer or physician on site determined the presence of a concussion. Athlete-exposures for practices and games also were captured. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Documented concussions were categorized by time missed from participation using severity outcome intervals (same-day return, 1- to 2-day return, 3- to 6-day return, 7- to 9-day return, 10- to 21-day return, >21-day return, no return [censored data]). We calculated Kaplan-Meier time-to-event probabilities that included censored data to determine the probability of RTP at each of these time intervals. RESULTS: A total of 81 new concussions were documented in 478 775 athlete-exposures during the study period. After a new concussion, the probability of RTP (95% confidence interval) was 2.5% (95% confidence interval = 0.3, 6.9) for a 1- to 2-day return, 71.3% (95% confidence interval = 59.0, 82.9) for a 7- to 9-day return, and 88.8% (95% confidence interval = 72.0, 97.2) for a 10- to 21-day return. CONCLUSIONS: For high school athletes, RTP within the first 2 days after concussion was unlikely. After 1 week, the probability of return rose substantially (approximately 71%). Prognostic indicators are used to educate patients about the likely course of disease. Whereas individual symptoms and recovery times vary, prognostic time-to-event probabilities allow clinicians to provide coaches, parents, and athletes with a prediction of the likelihood of RTP within certain timeframes after a concussion.
Authors: Michael W Collins; Mark R Lovell; Grant L Iverson; Robert C Cantu; Joseph C Maroon; Melvin Field Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Andrew E Lincoln; Shane V Caswell; Jon L Almquist; Reginald E Dunn; Joseph B Norris; Richard Y Hinton Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2011-01-29 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Corwin Boake; Stephen R McCauley; Harvey S Levin; Claudia Pedroza; Charles F Contant; James X Song; Sharon A Brown; Heather Goodman; Susan I Brundage; Pedro J Diaz-Marchan Journal: J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2005 Impact factor: 2.198
Authors: Anna E Kerschner; Daniel L Huber; Benjamin L Brett; Timothy B Meier; Lindsay D Nelson; Michael A McCrea Journal: Clin J Sport Med Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 3.638
Authors: Stefanie Schulte; Natalie N Rasmussen; Joseph W McBeth; Patrick Q Richards; Eric Yochem; David J Petron; Frederick G Strathmann Journal: EPMA J Date: 2016-01-27 Impact factor: 6.543
Authors: Grant L Iverson; Andrew J Gardner; Douglas P Terry; Jennie L Ponsford; Allen K Sills; Donna K Broshek; Gary S Solomon Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Rosemay A Remigio-Baker; Seth Kiser; Hamid Ferdosi; Emma Gregory; Scot Engel; Sean Sebesta; Daniel Beauchamp; Saafan Malik; Ann Scher; Sidney R Hinds Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 4.003