| Literature DB >> 24143242 |
Gwendoline Clotuche1, Maria Navajas, Anne-Catherine Mailleux, Thierry Hance.
Abstract
The two-spotted spider mite is a worldwide phytophagous pest displaying a peculiar dispersal. At high density, when plants are exhausted, individuals gather at the plant apex to form a collective silk-ball. This structure can be dispersed by wind or phoresy. Individuals initiating the ball are enclosed in the centre and have a high risk to die. For the first time, the ultimate and proximate mechanisms leading to this group dispersal are examined. To explore if a particular mite genotype was involved in the ball formation, plants were infested with individuals of different genetic background. After the silk-ball formation, the mites in the ball and those remaining on the plant were collected and genotyped. The balls were harvested after 4h and 24h to determine the role of timing between the formation and dispersal on the mortality of mites. Mites do not segregate according to their degree of relatedness, stage, or sex. Mites parallel humans using public transportation: they climb up in the ball whatever their genetic background. Silk-balls composed of unrelated individuals may help avoiding inbreeding when colonizing a new plant. Our results also emphasize the importance of an adequate timing for efficient dispersal between the time spent between ball formation and dispersal.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24143242 PMCID: PMC3797074 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077573
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Experimental set-up.
a) Plant infestation with A0 mites (infestation time, TI), b) Emergence of the silk-ball at the stick apex (emergence time, TE) and, c) Harvesting of the silk-ball after 24 or 4 hours (harvest time, TH).
Microsatellite loci assembled in two multiplex PCR sets, and used to genotype Tetranychus urticae mites (details on microsatellite isolation and characterization are described in [35,36], see Information S2).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
|
| (GT)6 | 262 | 264-270 | VIC | 0.02 | F: | |
| R: | |||||||
|
| (TC)7C(TC)5 | 128 | 121-127 | VIC | 0.02 | F: | |
| R: | |||||||
|
| (GT)29 | 154 | 148-168 | PET | 0.02 | F: | |
| R: | |||||||
|
| (GA)9 | 66 | 57-84 | PET | 0.02 | F: | |
| R: | |||||||
|
| (CA)7 | 276 | 263-275 | FAM | 0.02 | F: | |
| R: | |||||||
|
| (CT)15 | 129 | 102-128 | FAM | 0.02 | F: | |
| R: | |||||||
|
| (TC)13 | 164 | 155-165 | FAM | 0.02 | F: | |
| R: | |||||||
|
| (TC)7 | 164 | 163-168 | NED | 0.02 | F: | |
| R: | |||||||
|
| (TC)9 | 346 | 345-350 | NED | 0.02 | F: | |
| R: | |||||||
|
| (CT)9 | 95 | 95-107 | NED | 0.02 | F: | |
| R: | |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| (CA)7 | 111 | 111-113 | VIC | 0.02 | F: | |
| R: | |||||||
|
| (GT)6 | 205 | 206-208 | VIC | 0.02 | F: | |
| R: | |||||||
|
| (GAT)7 | 136 | 130-148 | PET | 0.02 | F: | |
| R: | |||||||
|
| (GT)30 | 152 | 144-182 | PET | 0.02 | F: | |
| R: | |||||||
|
| (GA)17 | 318 | 288-320 | NED | 0.02 | F: | |
| R: | |||||||
|
| (GA)8 | 154 | 150-156 | NED | 0.02 | F: | |
| R: | |||||||
|
| (TGA)8 | 108 | 99-120 | NED | 0.02 | F: | |
| R: | |||||||
|
| (CT)9 | 296 | 294-296 | FAM | 0.02 | F: | |
| R: | |||||||
|
| (CT)8 | 149 | 146-152 | FAM | 0.02 | F: | |
| R: | |||||||
|
| (TG)7 | 111 | 107-109 | FAM | 0.02 | F: | |
| R: | |||||||
Figure 2Design of the Experiment II using individuals from two isofemale lines (IF1, IF2).
Number of females a) Counted in the silk-ball and in the leaf, b) Genotyped and, c) Having a completed genotype is indicated for each repetition (N = 3).
Individual distribution per category (according to the origin of their parents: both parents came from the isofemale line 1, IF1 x IF1; one parent came from line 1 and the other from line 2, IF1 x IF2; both parents came from the isofemale line 2, IF2 x IF2) and per repetition (N = 3).
|
|
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| IF1 x IF1 | 9 | 6 | 0.6 | 7 | 6 | 0.077 | 3 | 6 | 1 |
| IF1 x IF2 | 33 | 42 | 1.08 | 56 | 43 | 1.707 | 21 | 27 | 0.75 |
| IF2 x IF2 | 47 | 42 | 0.281 | 21 | 23 | 0.091 | 6 | 11 | 1.471 |
Chi-square tests were used to assess whether the repartitions between the ball and the leaf were significantly different per category. IF = isofemale line.