| Literature DB >> 24143236 |
Faming Wang1, Xin Xu, Bi Zou, Zhihua Guo, Zhian Li, Weixing Zhu.
Abstract
Thousands of kilometers of shelterbelt plantations of Casuarina equisetifoliaEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24143236 PMCID: PMC3797117 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077449
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The general status of four age classes of C. equisetifolia plantations in 2011 (mean±S.E.).
| Stand age(yrs) | Density(plants ha−1) | DBH(cm) | Height(m) |
| 3 | 2350a±87 | 4.49d±0.28 | 4.92c±0.63 |
| 6 | 2200a±82 | 9.46c±0.14 | 8.16b±0.40 |
| 13 | 1250b±144 | 15.88b±0.40 | 12.67a±0.16 |
| 18 | 975b±63 | 19.35a±0.90 | 10.63b±0.57 |
Note: DBH: Diameter at breast height. Means in a column followed by different lower-case letters are significantly different at P<0.05 (one-way ANOVA and LSD test).
Biomass of four different age classes of C. equisetifolia plantations (Mg ha−1, mean ± S.E.).
| Stand age(yrs) | Stem | Branch | Branchlet | AGB | Root (BGB) | PB |
| 3 | 8.80c±2.06 | 2.59c±0.52 | 2.83b±0.37 | 14.22c±2.96 | 7.77c±0.43 | 21.99c±3.33 |
| 6 | 46.05b±2.79 | 10.65b±0.61 | 7.01a±0.35 | 63.71b±3.74 | 13.1b±0.60 | 76.9b±4.32 |
| 13 | 96.0a±6.70 | 18.3a±1.35 | 8.12a±0.69 | 122.5a±8.69 | 19.6a±1.44 | 142.1a±10.1 |
| 18 | 104.6a±21.9 | 18.5a±3.31 | 7.20a±0.91 | 130.3a±26.1 | 21.1a±4.32 | 151.5a±30.4 |
Note: AGB refers to aboveground biomass, PB refers to total plantation biomass. Means in a column followed by different lower-case letters are significantly different at P<0.05 (one-way ANOVA and LSD test).
Properties of the soil in four different age classes of C. equisetifolia plantations (only 0–10 and 10–20 cm soil data were presented here, mean ± S.E.).
| Variables | Stand age | ||||
| Soildepth | 3 | 6 | 13 | 18 | |
| BulkDensity(g cm−3) | 0–10 cm | 1.54±0.02 | 1.50±0.01 | 1.49±0.03 | 1.53±0.02 |
| 10–20 cm | 1.50±0.02 | 1.50±0.01 | 1.47±0.01 | 1.48±0.02 | |
| SOC(g kg−1) | 0–10 cm | 2.67a±0.59 | 0.71b±0.06 | 0.87b±0.11 | 2.10a±0.14 |
| 10–20 cm | 2.35a±0.55 | 0.43c±0.05 | 0.49c±0.07 | 1.31b±0.11 | |
| TN (g kg−1) | 0–10 cm | 0.39a±0.02 | 0.09c±0.01 | 0.13c±0.02 | 0.19b±0.02 |
| 10–20 cm | 0.32a±0.04 | 0.09c±0.01 | 0.09b±0.02 | 0.15b±0.02 | |
| C/N | 0–10 cm | 6.94b±1.66 | 7.62b±0.68 | 6.68b±0.27 | 11.33a±1.38 |
| 10–20 cm | 7.12ab±1.39 | 4.84c±0.59 | 5.85bc±0.62 | 9.44a±1.37 | |
Note: Means in a row followed by different lower-case letters are significantly different at P<0.05 (one-way ANOVA and LSD test).
Figure 1The soil carbon density of four different age classes of C. equisetifolia plantations.
Note: Error bar indicating SE.
The depth distribution of fine root biomass at four age classes of C. equisetifolia plantations (Mg ha−1, mean ± S.E.).
| Stand age (yrs) | 0–10 cm | 10–20 cm | 20–40 cm | 40–60 cm | 60–80 cm | 80–100 cm | Total |
| 3 | 0.68±0.09 | 0.54±0.06 | 0.62±0.09 | 0.34±0.12 | 0.29b±0.13 | 0.16b±0.07 | 2.62b±0.37 |
| 6 | 0.59±0.04 | 0.64±0.11 | 0.86±0.27 | 0.80±0.09 | 0.65a±0.13 | 0.94a±0.22 | 4.48a±0.40 |
| 13 | 0.59±0.20 | 0.40±0.10 | 0.71±0.16 | 0.41±0.06 | 0.23b±0.08 | 0.36b±0.12 | 2.69b±0.55 |
| 18 | 1.03±0.25 | 0.55±0.06 | 0.64±0.23 | 0.38±0.19 | 0.09b±0.04 | 0.13b±0.06 | 2.82b±0.67 |
Note: Means in a column followed by different lower-case letters are significantly different at P<0.05(LSD test).
Carbon storage in biomass and soils in four C. equisetifolia plantations (Mg ha−1, mean ± S.E.).
| Stand age(yrs) | Stem | Branch | Leaf | AGCS | Root | TBCS | SOC | TCS |
| 3 | 3.94c±0.92 | 1.18c±0.24 | 1.22b±0.16 | 6.34c±1.32 | 2.49c±0.14 | 8.83c±1.44 | 17.74a±3.21 | 26.57c±2.80 |
| 6 | 21.04b±0.00 | 4.82b±0.27 | 2.93a±0.14 | 28.78b±0.42 | 4.58bc±0.21 | 33.37b±0.63 | 5.14c±0.24 | 38.51b±2.11 |
| 13 | 44.19a±3.09 | 8.34a±0.61 | 3.41a±0.29 | 55.94a±3.97 | 6.91ab±0.51 | 62.85a±4.48 | 6.93c±0.24 | 69.78a±4.68 |
| 18 | 48.35a±10.1 | 8.31a±1.49 | 2.99a±0.38 | 59.65a±12.0 | 8.26a±1.69 | 67.91a±13.6 | 11.87b±0.76 | 79.78a±13.91 |
Note: SOC, TBCS, AGCS and TCS refer to soil organic carbon (0–100 cm), total biomass C storage, aboveground C storage and total C storage, respectively. Means in a column followed by different lower-case letters are significantly different at P<0.05(one-way ANOVA and LSD test).
Average annual rate of biomass carbon accumulation at four age classes of C. equisetifolia plantations (Mg C ha−1 yr−1).
| Stand stage | AGC | BGC | TBC |
| 0–3 yrs | 2.1 | 0.8 | 2.9 |
| 3–6 yrs | 7.5 | 0.7 | 8.2 |
| 6–13 yrs | 3.9 | 0.3 | 4.2 |
| 13–18 yrs | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.0 |
Note: AGB refers to aboveground biomass C; BGC refers to belowground biomass C; TBC refers to total biomass C.