| Literature DB >> 24143236 |
Faming Wang1, Xin Xu, Bi Zou, Zhihua Guo, Zhian Li, Weixing Zhu.
Abstract
Thousands of kilometers of shelterbelt plantations of Casuarina equisetifolia have been planted to protect the southeast coastline of China. These plantations also play an important role in the regional carbon (C) cycling. In this study, we examined plant biomass increment and C accumulation in four different aged C. equisetifolia plantations in sandy beaches in South China. The C accumulated in the C. equisetifolia plant biomass increased markedly with stand age. The annual rate of C accumulation in the C. equisetifolia plant biomass during 0-3, 3-6, 6-13 and 13-18 years stage was 2.9, 8.2, 4.2 and 1.0 Mg C ha(-1) yr(-1), respectively. Soil organic C (SOC) at the top 1 m soil layer in these plantations was 17.74, 5.14, 6.93, and 11.87 Mg C ha(-1), respectively, with SOC density decreasing with increasing soil depth. Total C storage in the plantation ecosystem averaged 26.57, 38.50, 69.78, and 79.79 Mg C ha(-1) in the 3, 6, 13 and 18- yrs plantation, with most of the C accumulated in the aboveground biomass rather than in the belowground root biomass and soil organic C. Though our results suggest that C. equisetifolia plantations have the characteristics of fast growth, high biomass accumulation, and the potential of high C sequestration despite planting in poor soil conditions, the interactive effects of soil condition, natural disturbance, and human policies on the ecosystem health of the plantation need to be further studied to fully realize the ecological and social benefits of the C equisetifolia shelterbelt forests in South China.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24143236 PMCID: PMC3797117 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077449
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The general status of four age classes of C. equisetifolia plantations in 2011 (mean±S.E.).
| Stand age(yrs) | Density(plants ha−1) | DBH(cm) | Height(m) |
| 3 | 2350a±87 | 4.49d±0.28 | 4.92c±0.63 |
| 6 | 2200a±82 | 9.46c±0.14 | 8.16b±0.40 |
| 13 | 1250b±144 | 15.88b±0.40 | 12.67a±0.16 |
| 18 | 975b±63 | 19.35a±0.90 | 10.63b±0.57 |
Note: DBH: Diameter at breast height. Means in a column followed by different lower-case letters are significantly different at P<0.05 (one-way ANOVA and LSD test).
Biomass of four different age classes of C. equisetifolia plantations (Mg ha−1, mean ± S.E.).
| Stand age(yrs) | Stem | Branch | Branchlet | AGB | Root (BGB) | PB |
| 3 | 8.80c±2.06 | 2.59c±0.52 | 2.83b±0.37 | 14.22c±2.96 | 7.77c±0.43 | 21.99c±3.33 |
| 6 | 46.05b±2.79 | 10.65b±0.61 | 7.01a±0.35 | 63.71b±3.74 | 13.1b±0.60 | 76.9b±4.32 |
| 13 | 96.0a±6.70 | 18.3a±1.35 | 8.12a±0.69 | 122.5a±8.69 | 19.6a±1.44 | 142.1a±10.1 |
| 18 | 104.6a±21.9 | 18.5a±3.31 | 7.20a±0.91 | 130.3a±26.1 | 21.1a±4.32 | 151.5a±30.4 |
Note: AGB refers to aboveground biomass, PB refers to total plantation biomass. Means in a column followed by different lower-case letters are significantly different at P<0.05 (one-way ANOVA and LSD test).
Properties of the soil in four different age classes of C. equisetifolia plantations (only 0–10 and 10–20 cm soil data were presented here, mean ± S.E.).
| Variables | Stand age | ||||
| Soildepth | 3 | 6 | 13 | 18 | |
| BulkDensity(g cm−3) | 0–10 cm | 1.54±0.02 | 1.50±0.01 | 1.49±0.03 | 1.53±0.02 |
| 10–20 cm | 1.50±0.02 | 1.50±0.01 | 1.47±0.01 | 1.48±0.02 | |
| SOC(g kg−1) | 0–10 cm | 2.67a±0.59 | 0.71b±0.06 | 0.87b±0.11 | 2.10a±0.14 |
| 10–20 cm | 2.35a±0.55 | 0.43c±0.05 | 0.49c±0.07 | 1.31b±0.11 | |
| TN (g kg−1) | 0–10 cm | 0.39a±0.02 | 0.09c±0.01 | 0.13c±0.02 | 0.19b±0.02 |
| 10–20 cm | 0.32a±0.04 | 0.09c±0.01 | 0.09b±0.02 | 0.15b±0.02 | |
| C/N | 0–10 cm | 6.94b±1.66 | 7.62b±0.68 | 6.68b±0.27 | 11.33a±1.38 |
| 10–20 cm | 7.12ab±1.39 | 4.84c±0.59 | 5.85bc±0.62 | 9.44a±1.37 | |
Note: Means in a row followed by different lower-case letters are significantly different at P<0.05 (one-way ANOVA and LSD test).
Figure 1The soil carbon density of four different age classes of C. equisetifolia plantations.
Note: Error bar indicating SE.
The depth distribution of fine root biomass at four age classes of C. equisetifolia plantations (Mg ha−1, mean ± S.E.).
| Stand age (yrs) | 0–10 cm | 10–20 cm | 20–40 cm | 40–60 cm | 60–80 cm | 80–100 cm | Total |
| 3 | 0.68±0.09 | 0.54±0.06 | 0.62±0.09 | 0.34±0.12 | 0.29b±0.13 | 0.16b±0.07 | 2.62b±0.37 |
| 6 | 0.59±0.04 | 0.64±0.11 | 0.86±0.27 | 0.80±0.09 | 0.65a±0.13 | 0.94a±0.22 | 4.48a±0.40 |
| 13 | 0.59±0.20 | 0.40±0.10 | 0.71±0.16 | 0.41±0.06 | 0.23b±0.08 | 0.36b±0.12 | 2.69b±0.55 |
| 18 | 1.03±0.25 | 0.55±0.06 | 0.64±0.23 | 0.38±0.19 | 0.09b±0.04 | 0.13b±0.06 | 2.82b±0.67 |
Note: Means in a column followed by different lower-case letters are significantly different at P<0.05(LSD test).
Carbon storage in biomass and soils in four C. equisetifolia plantations (Mg ha−1, mean ± S.E.).
| Stand age(yrs) | Stem | Branch | Leaf | AGCS | Root | TBCS | SOC | TCS |
| 3 | 3.94c±0.92 | 1.18c±0.24 | 1.22b±0.16 | 6.34c±1.32 | 2.49c±0.14 | 8.83c±1.44 | 17.74a±3.21 | 26.57c±2.80 |
| 6 | 21.04b±0.00 | 4.82b±0.27 | 2.93a±0.14 | 28.78b±0.42 | 4.58bc±0.21 | 33.37b±0.63 | 5.14c±0.24 | 38.51b±2.11 |
| 13 | 44.19a±3.09 | 8.34a±0.61 | 3.41a±0.29 | 55.94a±3.97 | 6.91ab±0.51 | 62.85a±4.48 | 6.93c±0.24 | 69.78a±4.68 |
| 18 | 48.35a±10.1 | 8.31a±1.49 | 2.99a±0.38 | 59.65a±12.0 | 8.26a±1.69 | 67.91a±13.6 | 11.87b±0.76 | 79.78a±13.91 |
Note: SOC, TBCS, AGCS and TCS refer to soil organic carbon (0–100 cm), total biomass C storage, aboveground C storage and total C storage, respectively. Means in a column followed by different lower-case letters are significantly different at P<0.05(one-way ANOVA and LSD test).
Average annual rate of biomass carbon accumulation at four age classes of C. equisetifolia plantations (Mg C ha−1 yr−1).
| Stand stage | AGC | BGC | TBC |
| 0–3 yrs | 2.1 | 0.8 | 2.9 |
| 3–6 yrs | 7.5 | 0.7 | 8.2 |
| 6–13 yrs | 3.9 | 0.3 | 4.2 |
| 13–18 yrs | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.0 |
Note: AGB refers to aboveground biomass C; BGC refers to belowground biomass C; TBC refers to total biomass C.