| Literature DB >> 24142929 |
Christopher L Pickett1, Nicholas Dietrich, Junfang Chen, Chengjie Xiong, Kerry Kornfeld.
Abstract
The relationships between reproduction and aging are important for understanding the mechanisms of aging and evaluating evolutionary theories of aging. To investigate the effects of progeny production on reproductive and somatic aging, we conducted longitudinal studies of Caenorhabditis elegans hermaphrodites. For mated wild-type animals that were not sperm limited and survived past the end of the reproductive period, high levels of cross-progeny production were positively correlated with delayed reproductive and somatic aging. In this group of animals, individuals that generated more cross progeny also reproduced and lived longer than individuals that generated fewer cross progeny. These results indicate that progeny production does not accelerate reproductive or somatic aging. This longitudinal study demonstrated that cumulative cross progeny production through day four is an early-stage biomarker that is a positive predictor of longevity. Furthermore, in mated animals, high levels of early cross progeny production were positively correlated with high levels of late cross progeny production, indicating that early progeny production does not accelerate reproductive aging. The relationships between progeny production and aging were further evaluated by comparing self-fertile hermaphrodites that generated relatively few self progeny with mated hermaphrodites that generated many cross progeny. The timing of age-related somatic degeneration was similar in these groups, suggesting progeny production does not accelerate somatic aging. These studies rigorously define relationships between progeny production, reproductive aging, and somatic aging and identify new biomarkers of C. elegans aging. These results indicate that some mechanisms or pathways control age-related degeneration of both reproductive and somatic tissues in C. elegans.Entities:
Keywords: C. elegans; aging; biomarker; longitudinal study; reproduction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24142929 PMCID: PMC3852384 DOI: 10.1534/g3.113.008664
Source DB: PubMed Journal: G3 (Bethesda) ISSN: 2160-1836 Impact factor: 3.154
Figure 1Increased progeny production in mated animals did not accelerate somatic aging. (A, B) Live progeny production, (C, D) reproductive span, (E, F) coordinated body movement span, (G, H) pharyngeal pumping span, and (I, J) life span were quantified for mated and self-fertile WT hermaphrodites and mated and unmated fog-2(q71) females analyzed using a longitudinal study design. The data in (A), (B), (I), and (J) were reported in Pickett and Kornfeld (2013).
Summary statistics for reproduction and aging assays
| Mean | ANOVA | Log-rank | log ANOVA | Wilcoxon | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A: Summary statistics for life span of WT animals, cross-sectional | |||||
| Life span | |||||
| Mated | 15.2 ± 3.8 | 0.1106 | 0.2386 | 0.0774 | 0.1366 |
| Self-fertile | 16.2 ± 3.3 | ||||
| B: Summary statistics for WT animals, longitudinal | |||||
| Brood size | |||||
| Mated | 710 ± 180 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Self-fertile | 330 ± 40 | ||||
| Reproductive span | |||||
| Mated | 8.8 ± 1.8 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Self-fertile | 4.6 ± 0.9 | ||||
| Movement span | |||||
| Mated | 7.1 ± 2.1 | 0.1601 | 0.1991 | 0.1354 | 0.1184 |
| Self-fertile | 7.7 ± 2.2 | ||||
| Pumping span | |||||
| Mated | 11.9 ± 2.4 | 0.6162 | 0.3481 | 0.2814 | 0.4549 |
| Self-fertile | 11.6 ± 3.8 | ||||
| Life span | |||||
| Mated | 15.6 ± 3.3 | 0.0809 | 0.0137 | 0.2309 | 0.3967 |
| Self-fertile | 17.1 ± 5.8 | ||||
| C: Summary statistics for | |||||
| Brood size | |||||
| Mated | 630 ± 180 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Unmated | 0 ± 0 | ||||
| Reproductive span | |||||
| Mated | 7.7 ± 2.3 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Unmated | 0 ± 0 | ||||
| Movement span | |||||
| Mated | 5.8 ± 1.9 | 0.3062 | 0.2701 | 0.3561 | 0.3381 |
| Unmated | 5.4 ± 1.7 | ||||
| Pumping span | |||||
| Mated | 11.3 ± 3.3 | 0.1549 | 0.4617 | 0.0938 | 0.0722 |
| Unmated | 10.2 ± 3.9 | ||||
| Life span | |||||
| Mated | 16.3 ± 4.6 | 0.0664 | 0.1787 | 0.0443 | 0.0359 |
| Unmated | 14.4 ± 4.9 |
Summary statistics for self-fertile WT hermaphrodites and WT hermaphrodites mated to WT males and evaluated in a (A) cross-sectional study or (B) longitudinal study, and (C) unmated fog-2(q71) females and fog-2(q71) females mated to WT males evaluated in a longitudinal study. The number of animals analyzed was (A) mated = 54, self-fertile = 81, (B) mated = 64, self-fertile = 67, and (C) mated = 45, unmated = 41. The brood size and life spans of self-fertile and mated WT hermaphrodites analyzed longitudinally and mated fog-2(q71) females were reported in Pickett and Kornfeld (2013). ANOVA, analysis of variance; WT, wild type; N/A, not available.
P values for univariate ANOVA or log-rank analysis.
To approximate normal data distribution, we conducted ANOVA after log transformation of the data (log ANOVA) and the nonparametric Wilcoxon test.
Brood size is measured as total progeny production. Spans are measured in days. All values are mean ± SD.
ANOVA and Wilcoxon tests are not appropriate for these comparisons given the 0 values for unmated fog-2(q71) brood size and reproductive span. t-tests indicate P < 0.001.
Figure 2Self-fertile and mated WT hermaphrodites displayed similar life spans. Survival curves for WT hermaphrodites that were self fertile or mated to WT males for 24 hr on day 1 of adulthood and analyzed using a cross sectional study design.
Figure 3Increased brood size was correlated with delayed somatic aging in mated hermaphrodites. Scatter plots comparing brood size with reproductive and somatic aging in mated (closed circle) and self-fertile (open circle) WT hermaphrodites. Each data point represents the brood size and (A) reproductive span, (B) body movement span, (C) pharyngeal pumping span, and (D) life span for an individual animal. Pearson correlation coefficients are denoted by r values. *P < 0.05. Number of animals: WT self-fertile = 67, WT mated = 64.
Pearson correlation values for WT hermaphrodites
| RS | MS | PS | LS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-fertile | ||||
| Brood | − | − | − | |
| RS | − | −0.08 (0.530) | −0.06 (0.635) | −0.03 (0.837) |
| MS | − | − | 0.55 (<0.001) | 0.44 (<0.001) |
| PS | − | − | − | 0.86 (<0.001) |
| Mated to a WT | ||||
| Brood | ||||
| RS | − | 0.15 (0.226) | 0.25 (0.049) | 0.11 (0.403) |
| MS | − | − | 0.40 (<0.001) | 0.21 (0.088) |
| PS | − | − | − | 0.87 (<0.001) |
| Mated to a | ||||
| Brood | 0.15 (0.585) | 0.30 (0.275) | −0.14 (0.625) | 0.02 (0.930) |
| RS | − | 0.22 (0.438) | 0.48 (0.068) | 0.50 (0.060) |
| MS | − | − | 0.44 (0.105) | 0.70 (0.004) |
| PS | − | − | − | 0.88 (<0.001) |
| Mated to a | ||||
| Brood | 0.36 (0.220) | −0.17 (0.580) | 0.04 (0.900) | 0.12 (0.697) |
| RS | − | −0.38 (0.198) | −0.21 (0.487) | −0.30 (0.325) |
| MS | − | − | 0.54 (0.057) | 0.52 (0.071) |
| PS | − | − | − | 0.90 (<0.001) |
Each line shows the Pearson correlation value (r) between the two indicated life-history traits. P values are shown in parentheses. Values in bold indicate the data depicted in Figure 3. WT, wild type; RS, reproductive span; MS, body movement span; PS, pharyngeal pumping span; LS, life span; brood, total number of live progeny.
WT hermaphrodites were self-fertile (unmated) or mated to WT, lov-1(sy582), or fer-6(hc6) males.
Summary statistics of WT hermaphrodites mated to mutant males
| Brood | RS | MS | PS | LS | N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-fertile | 330 ± 40 | 4.6 ± 0.9 | 7.7 ± 2.2 | 11.6 ± 3.8 | 17.1 ± 5.8 | 67 |
| 340 ± 30 | 3.6 ± 0.5 | 6.0 ± 1.1 | 12.2 ± 4.4 | 17.2 ± 7.0 | 13 | |
| 320 ± 30 | 3.2 ± 0.4 | 6.7 ± 2.5 | 12.4 ± 3.6 | 17.8 ± 6.5 | 15 |
Values represent the mean ± SD. Brood size is measured in number of progeny. Spans are measured in days. The self-fertile data are the same as in Table 1. WT, wild type; brood, total number of live progeny; RS, reproductive span; MS, body movement span; PS, pharyngeal pumping span; LS, life span; ANOVA, analysis of variance.
Number of animals analyzed.
WT hermaphrodites were self-fertile or mated to lov-1(sy582) or fer-6(hc6) males.
P < 0.05 compared with self-fertile hermaphrodites by ANOVA.
Pearson correlation values for cumulative progeny production
| Cumulative Progeny Production (Days) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1−2 | 1−3 | 1−4 | 1−5 | 1−6 | 1−7 | 1−8 | 1−9 | 1−10 | 1−11 | |
| Mated | |||||||||||
| RS | 0.13 | 0.17 | 0.30 | 0.33 | 0.42 | 0.52 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.65 |
| MS | 0.41 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.43 |
| PS | 0.21 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.41 |
| LS | 0.13 | 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.27 | 0.29 | 0.30 | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.28 |
| Self-fertile | |||||||||||
| RS | −0.19 | −0.27 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.09 | − | − | − | − |
| MS | −0.08 | 0.02 | −0.04 | −0.05 | −0.05 | −0.05 | −0.05 | − | − | − | − |
| PS | −0.11 | −0.07 | −0.16 | −0.14 | −0.14 | −0.15 | −0.15 | − | − | − | − |
| LS | −0.15 | −0.12 | −0.18 | −0.16 | −0.16 | −0.17 | −0.17 | − | − | − | − |
Numbers are the Pearson correlation value between the indicated span and the cumulative progeny production during the indicated days. RS, reproductive span; MS, body movement span; PS, pharyngeal pumping span; LS, life span.
P < 0.05.
P < 0.05 after Bonferroni correction.
Figure 4Correlations between progeny production and life span in mated and self-fertile WT animals. Pearson rank correlation values (r) were plotted vs. (A) cumulative progeny production or (B) single-day progeny production. *P < 0.05. Number of animals: WT self-fertile = 67, WT mated = 64.
Pearson correlation values for daily progeny production
| Daily Progeny Production (Days) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | |
| Mated | |||||||||||
| RS | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.41 | 0.29 | 0.54 | 0.79 | 0.90 | 0.89 | 0.80 | 0.67 | 0.53 |
| MS | 0.41 | 0.53 | 0.37 | 0.42 | 0.24 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.24 |
| PS | 0.21 | 0.37 | 0.29 | 0.37 | 0.31 | 0.26 | 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.20 |
| LS | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.21 | 0.30 | 0.27 | 0.19 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.16 | 0.13 | 0.05 |
| Self-fertile | |||||||||||
| RS | −0.19 | −0.25 | 0.30 | 0.41 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.43 | — | — | — | — |
| MS | −0.08 | 0.05 | −0.09 | −0.02 | −0.07 | 0.00 | 0.06 | — | — | — | — |
| PS | −0.11 | −0.04 | −0.16 | 0.15 | −0.07 | −0.18 | 0.01 | — | — | — | — |
| LS | −0.15 | −0.09 | −0.14 | 0.15 | −0.07 | −0.16 | −0.05 | — | — | — | — |
Numbers are the Pearson correlation value between the indicated span and the daily progeny production on the indicated days. RS, reproductive span; MS, body movement span; PS, pharyngeal pumping span; LS, life span.
P < 0.05.
P < 0.05 after Bonferroni correction.
Figure 5Correlations between early and late reproduction in mated WT animals. (A) Daily progeny production of mated WT hermaphrodites. Brackets indicate early reproduction (days 1–2) and late reproduction (days 9–11) displayed a positive Pearson rank correlation value. *P < 0.05. (B) A population of mated hermaphrodites was analyzed by dividing them into three groups on the basis of the total brood size. The graphs show average daily progeny production of low-, middle-, and high-reproducing groups. Number of animals = 64
Pearson correlation values comparing early and late reproduction
| Cumulative Late Reproduction (Days) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6−11 | 7−11 | 8−11 | 9−11 | 10−11 | |
| Cumulative Early Reproduction (Days) | |||||
| 1−2 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.33 | 0.30 |
| 1−3 | 0.38 | 0.36 | 0.33 | 0.38 | 0.33 |
| 1−4 | 0.45 | 0.40 | 0.35 | 0.38 | 0.31 |
| 1−5 | 0.58 | 0.50 | 0.44 | 0.43 | 0.33 |
Numbers are the Pearson correlation values (r).
Cumulative progeny production for each animal was calculated from the indicated start point through day 11.
Cumulative progeny production for each animal was calculated from day 1 through the indicated endpoint.
P < 0.05.
P < 0.05 after Bonferroni correction.