Literature DB >> 24142814

Self-induced attentional blink: a cause of errors in multiple-target search.

Stephen H Adamo1, Matthew S Cain, Stephen R Mitroff.   

Abstract

Satisfaction of search (which we refer to as subsequent search misses)-a decrease in accuracy at detecting a second target after a first target has been found in a visual search-underlies real-world search errors (e.g., tumors may be missed in an X-ray if another tumor already has been found), but little is known about this phenomenon's cognitive underpinnings. In the present study, we examined subsequent search misses in terms of another, more extensively studied phenomenon: the attentional blink, a decrease in accuracy when a second target appears 200 to 500 ms after a first target is detected in a temporal stream. Participants searched for T-shaped targets among L-shaped distractors in a spatial visual search, and despite large methodological differences between self-paced spatial visual searches and attentional blink tasks, an attentional-blink-like effect accounted for subsequent-search-miss errors. This finding provides evidence that accuracy is negatively affected shortly after a first target is fixated in a self-paced, self-guided visual search.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attentional blink; satisfaction of search; subsequent search misses; visual attention; visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24142814     DOI: 10.1177/0956797613497970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  11 in total

1.  Analog Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) information can be more effective than binary marks.

Authors:  Corbin A Cunningham; Trafton Drew; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Satisfaction in motion: Subsequent search misses are more likely in moving search displays.

Authors:  Cary Stothart; Andrew Clement; James R Brockmole
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

3.  Discrete and continuous mechanisms of temporal selection in rapid visual streams.

Authors:  Sébastien Marti; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 4.  Use-inspired basic research in medical image perception.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2016-11-14

5.  The Role of Working Memory in Dual-Target Visual Search.

Authors:  Elena S Gorbunova; Kirill S Kozlov; Sofia Tkhan Tin Le; Ivan M Makarov
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-07-31

6.  Component processes in free-viewing visual search: Insights from fixation-aligned pupillary response averaging.

Authors:  Joel T Martin; Annalise H Whittaker; Stephen J Johnston
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  A novel, unbiased approach to evaluating subsequent search misses in dual target visual search.

Authors:  Mark W Becker; Kaitlyn Anderson; Jan W Brascamp
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  How did I miss that? Developing mixed hybrid visual search as a 'model system' for incidental finding errors in radiology.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Abla Alaoui Soce; Hayden M Schill
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2017-08-23

9.  Mammography to tomosynthesis: examining the differences between two-dimensional and segmented-three-dimensional visual search.

Authors:  Stephen H Adamo; Justin M Ericson; Joseph C Nah; Rachel Brem; Stephen R Mitroff
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-06-14

10.  No Effect of the Right Posterior Parietal Cortex tDCS in Dual-Target Visual Search.

Authors:  Alyona A Lanina; Matteo Feurra; Elena S Gorbunova
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.