PURPOSE: This study analyzed and evaluated the demographic, clinical, and cytogenetic data [G-banded karyotyping and array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH)] of patients with unexplained developmental delay or intellectual disability at a single Korean institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected clinical and cytogenetic data based on retrospective charts at Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Korea from April 2008 to March 2012. RESULTS: A total of 190 patients were identified. Mean age was 5.1±1.87 years. Array CGH yielded abnormal results in 26 of 190 patients (13.7%). Copy number losses were about two-fold more frequent than gains. A total of 61.5% of all patients had copy number losses. The most common deletion disorders included 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, 15q11.2q12 deletion and 18q deletion syndrome. Copy number gains were identified in 34.6% of patients, and common diseases among these included Potocki-Lupski syndrome, 15q11-13 duplication syndrome and duplication 22q. Abnormal karyotype with normal array CGH results was exhibited in 2.6% of patients; theses included balanced translocation (n=2), inversion (n=2) and low-level mosaicism (n=1). Facial abnormalities (p<0.001) and failure to thrive were (p<0.001) also more frequent in the group of patients with abnormal CGH findings. CONCLUSION: Array CGH is a useful diagnostic tool in clinical settings in patients with developmental delay or intellectual disability combined with facial abnormalities or failure to thrive.
PURPOSE: This study analyzed and evaluated the demographic, clinical, and cytogenetic data [G-banded karyotyping and array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH)] of patients with unexplained developmental delay or intellectual disability at a single Korean institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected clinical and cytogenetic data based on retrospective charts at Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Korea from April 2008 to March 2012. RESULTS: A total of 190 patients were identified. Mean age was 5.1±1.87 years. Array CGH yielded abnormal results in 26 of 190 patients (13.7%). Copy number losses were about two-fold more frequent than gains. A total of 61.5% of all patients had copy number losses. The most common deletion disorders included 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, 15q11.2q12 deletion and 18q deletion syndrome. Copy number gains were identified in 34.6% of patients, and common diseases among these included Potocki-Lupski syndrome, 15q11-13 duplication syndrome and duplication 22q. Abnormal karyotype with normal array CGH results was exhibited in 2.6% of patients; theses included balanced translocation (n=2), inversion (n=2) and low-level mosaicism (n=1). Facial abnormalities (p<0.001) and failure to thrive were (p<0.001) also more frequent in the group of patients with abnormal CGH findings. CONCLUSION: Array CGH is a useful diagnostic tool in clinical settings in patients with developmental delay or intellectual disability combined with facial abnormalities or failure to thrive.
Entities:
Keywords:
Array CGH; copy number variations; developmental delay; intellectual disability
Authors: M Shoukier; N Klein; B Auber; J Wickert; J Schröder; B Zoll; P Burfeind; I Bartels; E A Alsat; M Lingen; P Grzmil; S Schulze; J Keyser; D Weise; M Borchers; E Hobbiebrunken; M Röbl; J Gärtner; K Brockmann; B Zirn Journal: Clin Genet Date: 2012-02-21 Impact factor: 4.438
Authors: Marwan Shinawi; Lina Shao; Linda Jo Bone Jeng; Chad A Shaw; Ankita Patel; Carlos Bacino; Vernon R Sutton; John Belmont; Sau Wai Cheung Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2008-06-01 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Guy Horev; Jacob Ellegood; Jason P Lerch; Young-Eun E Son; Lakshmi Muthuswamy; Hannes Vogel; Abba M Krieger; Andreas Buja; R Mark Henkelman; Michael Wigler; Alea A Mills Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: David T Miller; Margaret P Adam; Swaroop Aradhya; Leslie G Biesecker; Arthur R Brothman; Nigel P Carter; Deanna M Church; John A Crolla; Evan E Eichler; Charles J Epstein; W Andrew Faucett; Lars Feuk; Jan M Friedman; Ada Hamosh; Laird Jackson; Erin B Kaminsky; Klaas Kok; Ian D Krantz; Robert M Kuhn; Charles Lee; James M Ostell; Carla Rosenberg; Stephen W Scherer; Nancy B Spinner; Dimitri J Stavropoulos; James H Tepperberg; Erik C Thorland; Joris R Vermeesch; Darrel J Waggoner; Michael S Watson; Christa Lese Martin; David H Ledbetter Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2010-05-14 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Victoria Q Tao; Kelvin Y K Chan; Yoyo W Y Chu; Gary T K Mok; Tiong Y Tan; Wanling Yang; So Lun Lee; Wing Fai Tang; Winnie W Y Tso; Elizabeth T Lau; Anita S Y Kan; Mary H Tang; Yu-Lung Lau; Brian H Y Chung Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-10-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jin Sook Lee; Hee Hwang; Soo Yeon Kim; Ki Joong Kim; Jin Sun Choi; Mi Jung Woo; Young Min Choi; Jong Kwan Jun; Byung Chan Lim; Jong Hee Chae Journal: Ann Lab Med Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Shibalik Misra; Greg Peters; Elizabeth Barnes; Simone Ardern-Holmes; Richard Webster; Christopher Troedson; Shekeeb S Mohammad; Deepak Gill; Manoj Menezes; Sachin Gupta; Peter Procopis; Jayne Antony; Manju A Kurian; Russell C Dale Journal: Neurol Genet Date: 2019-10-23