Literature DB >> 24141742

A study on mastectomy samples to evaluate breast imaging quality and potential clinical relevance of differential phase contrast mammography.

Nik Hauser1, Zhentian Wang, Rahel A Kubik-Huch, Mafalda Trippel, Gad Singer, Michael K Hohl, Ewald Roessl, Thomas Köhler, Udo van Stevendaal, Nataly Wieberneit, Marco Stampanoni.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Differential phase contrast and scattering-based x-ray mammography has the potential to provide additional and complementary clinically relevant information compared with absorption-based mammography. The purpose of our study was to provide a first statistical evaluation of the imaging capabilities of the new technique compared with digital absorption mammography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated non-fixed mastectomy samples of 33 patients with invasive breast cancer, using grating-based differential phase contrast mammography (mammoDPC) with a conventional, low-brilliance x-ray tube. We simultaneously recorded absorption, differential phase contrast, and small-angle scattering signals that were combined into novel high-frequency-enhanced images with a dedicated image fusion algorithm. Six international, expert breast radiologists evaluated clinical digital and experimental mammograms in a 2-part blinded, prospective independent reader study. The results were statistically analyzed in terms of image quality and clinical relevance.
RESULTS: The results of the comparison of mammoDPC with clinical digital mammography revealed the general quality of the images to be significantly superior (P < 0.001); sharpness, lesion delineation, as well as the general visibility of calcifications to be significantly more assessable (P < 0.001); and delineation of anatomic components of the specimens (surface structures) to be significantly sharper (P < 0.001). Spiculations were significantly better identified, and the overall clinically relevant information provided by mammoDPC was judged to be superior (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that complementary information provided by phase and scattering enhanced mammograms obtained with the mammoDPC approach deliver images of generally superior quality. This technique has the potential to improve radiological breast diagnostics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24141742     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  19 in total

1.  Low-dose, phase-contrast mammography with high signal-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  Lukas B Gromann; Dirk Bequé; Kai Scherer; Konstantin Willer; Lorenz Birnbacher; Marian Willner; Julia Herzen; Susanne Grandl; Karin Hellerhoff; Jonathan I Sperl; Franz Pfeiffer; Cristina Cozzini
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Improving radiation dose efficiency of X-ray differential phase contrast imaging using an energy-resolving grating interferometer and a novel rank constraint.

Authors:  Yongshuai Ge; Ran Zhang; Ke Li; Guang-Hong Chen
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Fast acquisition with seamless stage translation (FASST) for a trimodal x-ray breast imaging system.

Authors:  Ran Zhang; Amy M Fowler; Lee G Wilke; Frederick Kelcz; John W Garrett; Guang-Hong Chen; Ke Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Human-Compatible Multi-Contrast Mammographic Prototype System.

Authors:  Ran Zhang; Ke Li; John W Garrett; Guang-Hong Chen
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2019-03-07

5.  Diagnosis of breast cancer based on microcalcifications using grating-based phase contrast CT.

Authors:  Xinbin Li; Hewei Gao; Zhiqiang Chen; Li Zhang; Xiaohua Zhu; Shengping Wang; Weijun Peng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Toward Clinically Compatible Phase-Contrast Mammography.

Authors:  Kai Scherer; Konstantin Willer; Lukas Gromann; Lorenz Birnbacher; Eva Braig; Susanne Grandl; Anikó Sztrókay-Gaul; Julia Herzen; Doris Mayr; Karin Hellerhoff; Franz Pfeiffer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  X-ray phase-contrast tomography of renal ischemia-reperfusion damage.

Authors:  Astrid Velroyen; Martin Bech; Irene Zanette; Jolanda Schwarz; Alexander Rack; Christiane Tympner; Tanja Herrler; Claudia Staab-Weijnitz; Margarita Braunagel; Maximilian Reiser; Fabian Bamberg; Franz Pfeiffer; Mike Notohamiprodjo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Non-invasive differentiation of kidney stone types using X-ray dark-field radiography.

Authors:  Kai Scherer; Eva Braig; Konstantin Willer; Marian Willner; Alexander A Fingerle; Michael Chabior; Julia Herzen; Matthias Eiber; Bernhard Haller; Michael Straub; Heike Schneider; Ernst J Rummeny; Peter B Noël; Franz Pfeiffer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Improved visualization of breast cancer features in multifocal carcinoma using phase-contrast and dark-field mammography: an ex vivo study.

Authors:  Susanne Grandl; Kai Scherer; Anikó Sztrókay-Gaul; Lorenz Birnbacher; Konstantin Willer; Michael Chabior; Julia Herzen; Doris Mayr; Sigrid D Auweter; Franz Pfeiffer; Fabian Bamberg; Karin Hellerhoff
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Ex Vivo Perfusion-Simulation Measurements of Microbubbles as a Scattering Contrast Agent for Grating-Based X-Ray Dark-Field Imaging.

Authors:  Astrid Velroyen; Martin Bech; Arne Tapfer; Andre Yaroshenko; Mark Müller; Philipp Paprottka; Michael Ingrisch; Clemens C Cyran; Sigrid D Auweter; Konstantin Nikolaou; Maximilian F Reiser; Franz Pfeiffer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.