Rumi Hiratai1, Miho Nakamura, Kimihiro Yamashita. 1. Institute of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 2-3-10 Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda, Tokyo 101-0062, Japan.
Abstract
Hydroxyapatite (HA) has polarization capability and is able to accumulate electrical storage in bone. Experiments were conducted to measure the polarization capability of rabbit femurs. After preparing and polarizing bone samples using 2% KOH treatment (denoted 2% koh), 2% KOH and baking (2% koh+bake) and decalcification (decalcification) as well as untreated bone (untreated), stored charges were quantitatively determined using thermally stimulated depolarization current (TSDC) measurements. In TSDC spectra, untreated and 2% koh samples showed peaks at 100 and 500°C, while 2% koh+bake showed one peak at 580°C and decalcification one peak around 100°C. These evidences indicated that collagen and inorganic components play a major role in polarization of the bone at different temperature conditions.
Hydroxyapatite (HA) has polarization capability and is able to accumulate electrical storage in bone. Experiments were conducted to measure the polarization capability of rabbit femurs. After preparing and polarizing bone samples using 2% KOH treatment (denoted 2% koh), 2% KOH and baking (2% koh+bake) and decalcification (decalcification) as well as untreated bone (untreated), stored charges were quantitatively determined using thermally stimulated depolarization current (TSDC) measurements. In TSDC spectra, untreated and 2% koh samples showed peaks at 100 and 500°C, while 2% koh+bake showed one peak at 580°C and decalcification one peak around 100°C. These evidences indicated that collagen and inorganic components play a major role in polarization of the bone at different temperature conditions.
It was recognized by early studies that stimulation by mechanical loading, such as walking,
has an influence on bone’s remodeling [3]. According to
Wolff’s law proposed by Julius Wolff in 1892 [1], bone
could functionally adapt to a new principal stress trajectories, in response to trauma or
change of lifestyle, through reorienting its bony trabeculae. In the 1960s, it was conducted
to apply mechanical force perpendicular to the long direction of a bone, which was fixed at
one end [2, 3].
This experiment was based on the fact that the electrical potential could be measured by the
addition of mechanical stress to the bone. It was found that a negative potential was
generated on the concave side of the compressed bone [8,9,10,11, 14]. They termed this reaction a piezoelectric phenomenon.Although it has been shown that mechanical stimulation of bones has an electrical influence,
detailed mechanisms of how bones can sense mechanical stimulation, what types of electrical
changes can happen and in what way bone remodeling is influenced are still unknown. The fact
that electrical stimulation has an influence on bone formation is also known in the clinical
field, and studies into various methods of exerting an electrical influence on bones, such as
burying batteries in the body [19], electrically
stimulating the body through the skin [5, 7] and applying electrical stimulation non-invasively to the
body from outside [3], are progressing on a daily basis.
However, most of the hypotheses regarding functional mechanisms are based on reactions with
hormones, growth factors or cytokines [20, 21] rather than the direct function of electrical
stimulation of bone cells or bone structures. Today, it is recognized that the electrical
characteristics of dried bones can be mainly described by the piezoelectric phenomenon caused
by mechanical stress [12] or the streaming potential
generated by micro-flow of electrolytes containing fluid, such as blood serum, inside the bone
[6]. The piezoelectric phenomenon is known to occur in
dried bones, boiled bones and decalcified bones, and it is thought to be mainly caused by the
structural distortion of collagen [13, 24]. It was classically believed that piezoelectric effects
could not occur in hydroxyapatite (HA), as this material has a symmetrical hexagonal crystal
structure [4]. Therefore, it was assumed that inorganic
components similar to HA in bones did not exhibit piezoelectricity. However, it has been
recently reported that piezoelectricity can be measured on the surface layer of HA [22]. In addition, we have reported that HA acquires
polarization capability [25], which can
semi-permanently accumulate electricity, when a high voltage is applied at elevated
temperatures. We have also proved that polarized HA has a high bone affinity in living
organisms [15, 16]. Charged conditions caused by polarization can be preserved for long periods and
electricity is stored [18], while the electrical
potential caused by piezoelectricity is reversible and the relatively high voltage is retained
only for a short period of time on the outside surfaces of crystals.We thought it should be possible to find conditions which cause polarization, enabling charge
accumulation in bones. We also considered that inorganic components, which constitute 80% of
bone material, played some role in this process. The purpose of this study is to investigate
electrical properties and functions of collagen fibrils and mineral crystals of bone tissue
using rabbit femurs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sample preparation: The bone samples were extracted from the 10-week-old,
male, Japanese White rabbits. At least one week prior to conducting the experiment, each
rabbit was acclimatized to the environment by being housed separately in a temperature
controlled facility having 12-hr light/dark cycle. The rabbits were allowed to food and
water ad libitum. The animals utilized in this experiment all received
human care. The experimental protocol was approved by the Animal Welfare Regulation
Committee of the Tokyo Medical and Dental University. After being preserved at a temperature
of −80°C, eight rabbit femurs were cut in half transversely. Some samples were immersed in
2% KOH solution for 4 days (2% koh), immersed in 2% KOH and then baked in electrical furnace
at 800°C for 10 min (2% koh+bake). Other samples were decalcified by treatment with EDTA
(decalcification). The epiphysis of these samples, as well as the bone with no treatment
(untreated), was longitudinally cut and grinded into uniform shapes 4 × 7 × 0.45 mm for
measurement with a diamond saw (Buehler, Lake Bluff, IL, U.S.A.) and diamond disk (5
µm). The bone samples were washed with deionized water and then dried at
40°C until use.Dense ceramic samples of hydroxyapatite (HA) were prepared as a control. HA powder was
synthesized from analytical-grade reagents of calcium hydroxide and phosphoric acid by the
wet method [16], calcined at 850°C for 1 hr, pressed
into a mold at 200 MPa and sintered in a saturated water vapor atmosphere at 1,250°C for 2
hr to suppress dehydration.Characterization: Bone samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction
(XRD), Fourier transform-infrared (FT-IR) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).XRD measurements for each powdered sample were performed for phase analysis at room
temperature with CuKα radiation at 40 kV and 40 mA on a diffraction spectrometer (PW-1700,
PHILIPS Co., Ltd., Amsterdam, Netherlands) equipped with a graphite monochromator.FT-IR spectra of each sample were measured in the range of 400–4,000 cm−1 using
an infrared spectrophotometer (I-2000, JEOL Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The samples were
pulverized with a mortar and pestle for the KBr method of which KBr and the samples were
mixed in a ratio of 20:1. Then, peak ratios of ν3CO3 and
ν2CO3 to ν3PO4 were calculated from the
measurements.After the treatments, bone samples were dried and sputtered with platinum/palladium.
Surface morphology of each sample was observed at higher and lower magnifications using a
scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Hitachi Instruments Service Co., Ltd., Tokyo,
Japan).Polarization: For the polarization measurement, samples were pinched by
platinum electrodes, and the outside of each electrode was covered by alumina and clamped. A
direct current electric field was applied to the samples using stabilized DC power supply
units (AE8800, ATTO Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan and E3260A, HEWLETT PACKARD Co., Ltd., Palo
Alto, CA, U.S.A.) under the chosen polarization condition. Regards, the samples were treated
at 400°C with an electric field of 5 kV/cm for 1 hr and at 37°C with an electric field of 5
kV/cm for 1 hr. To avoid polarization relaxation, the electric field was maintained, while
the samples were cooled down to the room temperature. The control sample was also treated at
400°C for 1 hr, but without electric field.TSDC measurement: Samples were once again pinched by platinum electrodes,
and the outside of the electrodes was covered by alumina plates and clamped. TSDC
measurement of the samples was accomplished using a min electric current measuring unit
(4140B pA METER, HEWLETT PACKARD Co., Ltd., Palo Alto, CA, U.S.A.). The polarization
relaxation current was measured, while the sample temperature was increased at a constant
5°C/min from room temperature to 650°C. The amount of stored charge in the samples was
calculated by surface integration of the TSDC spectrum.Change of mass: In order to obtain the remaining organic ratios, each
prepared bone sample was baked at 1,000°C for 30 min with weight measured before and after
baking.Proportion measurement of collagen: The amount of hydroxyproline, a main
component of collagen of each sample, was quantitatively determined by the following
procedure. Steps for this measurement are described below. The sample was combined with 6 M
HCl and heated at 110°C for 24 hr to enable amino acid analysis. The reaction mixture was
then dried in a rotary evaporator and dissolved in 0.02 M HCl. Amino acid analysis was then
performed on an L-8800 amino acid analyzer (Hitachi Instruments Service Co., Tokyo, Japan)
using citrate buffers and a sodium chloride gradient. Amino acids in the eluate were
monitored by post-column reaction with ninhydrin. After measurement, the weight percentage
of collagen in each sample was calculated.
RESULTS
Characterization: Infrared absorption peaks corresponding to
ν2CO3 and ν3CO3 modes were detected to confirm
the existence of carbonic acid group in the untreated and 2% koh samples (Fig. 1). The strength of ν2CO3 and ν3CO3 in
comparison with ν3PO4 signal was 13 and 58.8% for the untreated
samples, 8.8 and 48.8% for the 2% koh samples and 0 and 13.3% for the 2% koh+bake sample,
respectively (Table 1). Thus, the remaining organic substance was highest in the 2% koh+bake
sample.
Fig. 1.
FT-IR measurement results for the untreated, 2% koh and 2% koh+bake samples. Infrared
absorption peaks in ν2CO3 and ν3CO3 modes
confirmed the existence of carbonic acid group in the untreated and 2% koh
samples.
Table 1.
CO3 ratio of each sample to ν3PO4 and amounts of
the remaining organic substances in the untreated, 2% koh and 2% koh+bake
samples
Untreated (%)
2% koh (%)
2%koh+bake (%)
v2CO3
13.0
8.8
0.0
v3CO3
58.8
48.8
13.3
Remaining organic substance
62.0
65.0
97.0
FT-IR measurement results for the untreated, 2% koh and 2% koh+bake samples. Infrared
absorption peaks in ν2CO3 and ν3CO3 modes
confirmed the existence of carbonic acid group in the untreated and 2% koh
samples.X-ray diffraction peaks detected for every sample were attributed to HA, as the patterns
were able to be matched to publish data ICDD no.9-432, and demonstrated that the surfaces of
the specimens consisted of a single phase of hexagonal HA (indicated by open circles) (Fig. 2). The 2% koh sample showed broad pattern indicating amorphous compositions which were
similar to that of the untreated sample, while crystallization was observed in the 2%
koh+bake sample. Figure 3 shows the resulting SEM images. Surface of the untreated sample was rough, and that
of the 2% koh sample was almost uniform. Collagen fibers were exposed in the decalcification
sample. Many small voids in the 2% koh+bake sample seemed to be the results of collagen
removal.
Fig. 2.
XRD patterns of untreated, 2% koh and 2% koh+bake samples. The bone samples consisted
of a single phase of hexagonal HA (indicated by open circles).
Fig. 3.
SEM observation of the untreated, 2% koh, 2% koh+bake samples and decalcification
samples. Surface of the untreated sample was rough, and that of the 2% koh sample was
almost uniform. Collagen fibers were exposed in the decalcification sample. Many small
voids in the 2% koh+bake sample seemed to be the results of collagen removal.
XRD patterns of untreated, 2% koh and 2% koh+bake samples. The bone samples consisted
of a single phase of hexagonal HA (indicated by open circles).SEM observation of the untreated, 2% koh, 2% koh+bake samples and decalcification
samples. Surface of the untreated sample was rough, and that of the 2% koh sample was
almost uniform. Collagen fibers were exposed in the decalcification sample. Many small
voids in the 2% koh+bake sample seemed to be the results of collagen removal.TSDC spectra of the untreated, 2% koh, 2% koh+bake samples and decalcification
samples. The untreated and 2% koh samples exhibited two peaks in the vicinity of 100
and 500°C. The single peak of the 2% koh+bake sample was near 580°C, and that of the
decalcified samples was in the vicinity of 100°C.TSDC measurement and the amount of stored charge: The amount of the stored
charges of all samples (Fig. 5) was calculated from their TSDC spectra (Fig.
4). The stored charge of the unpolarized 2% koh sample was 0.04
µC/cm2, but those of the untreated, 2% koh, 2% koh+bake and HA
(or decalcified) samples treated at 400 vs. 37°C for 1 hr with an electric field of 5 kV/cm
were 1.72 vs. 0.96, 138 vs. 1.63, 11.31 vs. 11.69 and 18 vs. 5.8
µC/cm2, respectively. Besides, those of the 2% koh samples
treated at 37°C for 1 and 10 min with an electric field of 5 kV/cm were 0.96 and 1.57
µC/cm2. It was apparently that polarization in a harsher 400°C
condition was not possible as the sample was burned and destroyed (Fig. 5). Peak of the TSDC spectrum of the untreated, 2% koh and 2%
koh+bake samples was found in the vicinity of 100, 450–500 and near 580°C, respectively
(Fig. 4). The second peak could not be observed,
since the samples were destroyed at higher temperature.
Fig. 5.
The amount of stored charges calculated from TSDC spectra of each sample.
Fig. 4.
TSDC spectra of the untreated, 2% koh, 2% koh+bake samples and decalcification
samples. The untreated and 2% koh samples exhibited two peaks in the vicinity of 100
and 500°C. The single peak of the 2% koh+bake sample was near 580°C, and that of the
decalcified samples was in the vicinity of 100°C.
The amount of stored charges calculated from TSDC spectra of each sample.Change of mass: The untreated, 2% koh and 2% koh+bake samples were burned
at 1,000°C for 30 min, and the bone mass ratio between before and after burning was
calculated for each sample. Those ratios were 62% for untreated, 65% for 2% koh and 97% for
2% koh+bake samples (Table 1).Proportion measurement of collagen: The amount of hydroxyproline, a main
component of collagen, was quantitatively determined for each sample, and the weight
proportion of collagen was calculated. These results were 13.84% for untreated, 13.86% for
2% koh, 0% for 2% koh+bake and 74.2% for decalcification samples (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6.
The proportion of collagen weight calculated from the measurement of
hydroxyproline.
The proportion of collagen weight calculated from the measurement of
hydroxyproline.
DISCUSSION
In this experiment, untreated, 2% koh and 2% koh+bake bone samples were prepared from
rabbit femur, and all could be polarized after treatment at 400°C with an applied electric
field of 5 kV/cm for 1 hr. These are conditions under which HA can be polarized. However, in
addition, all the samples could be polarized at a lower temperature of 37°C, at which HA
cannot be polarized [23].The 2% koh sample exhibited stored charge of 138 µC/cm2 after
being subjected to the strongest treatment conditions, a very high degree of charge storage
compared to the other samples. This sample could also be polarized at lower temperature
conditions with shorter treatment time. At 37°C, this sample was treated for 1 hr with the
electric fields of 5 kV/cm for 10 min with 5 kV/cm and for 1 min with 1 kV/cm (Fig. 5). These results mean that the polarization of
bones is possible even at body temperature. It was also found that the 2% koh sample had
almost the same quantity of CO3 as the untreated sample (Fig. 1, Table 1) and
structurally was in a broad amorphous state with no crystallization observed by XRD. Those
findings indicated that the 2% koh sample was not crystallized and could retain similar
characteristics to that in the untreated sample (Fig.
2). In addition, the 3% higher in weight ratio of the 2% koh sample either before
or after burning than the untreated sample, and a similar weight proportion of collagen in
both samples (Fig. 6) would indicate a similar
condition of collagen components in bone structure of both samples. However, this experiment
still cannot explain clearly why the amount of the stored charge of the untreated sample was
much lower than that of the 2% koh sample.The 2% koh+bake sample showed similar results in IR and XRD measurements to those of HA.
This sample could be polarized at the usual high temperature conditions, giving stored
charge of 11.31 µC/cm2. This value was similar to that of HA,
which gave 18 µC/cm2. On the other hand, the 2% koh+bake sample
could be polarized under the lower temperature conditions, giving stored charge of 11.96
µC/cm2, similar to the high temperature treatment, while HA
could not be polarized at temperatures below 200°C. The 2% koh+bake sample had a mass ratio
of 97%. This sample also showed 0% collagen content. These findings suggest that this sample
was rendered a completely inorganic material by the sample treatment. Thus, the polarization
capability of this sample is due to inorganic components of the bone. However, XRD
measurement showed that the sample was crystallized in the same way as HA, while IR
measurement revealed an extremely low CO3 content. This meant that the sample had
not retained the properties which were similar to those of bones.The high weight proportion of collagen in the decalcification sample (74.2%) would indicate
a successful removal of inorganic components from the bone; thus, leaving mainly organic
components in situ. It is a matter of fact that such decalcified bone
containing almost purely collagen could not tolerate a high temperature treatment. Thus,
induction of polarization could merely perform only in a lower temperature. This statement
indeed supports the concept that polarization of the bone relies largely on its organic
components [17].Double peaks of the untreated and 2% koh samples were found in the vicinity of 100 and
500°C. In contrast, the 2% koh+bake sample had only single peak in the region of 580°C
(Fig. 4). At high temperature, it is certainly
that collagen in the rabbit’s bone could not be preserved; therefore, there was only one
TSDC peak at the vicinity of 500°C. For the decalcified bone, a TSDC peak was found near the
100°C region. Similar polarization pattern of collagen portion of decalcified bone of
various animal species had also been shown by Mascarenhas et al. [17]. The study in the decalcified bone also confirmed the
polarizability of its collagen content. From these findings, it is conceivable that collagen
is responsible for the polarization at around 100°C while the inorganic components are
responsible at around 500°C.Along with the already described phenomena regarding piezoelectric activity and streaming
potential, this experiment could found evidences of polarization which enable electrical
storage of the bone. Polarization of the bone could be induced even at 37°C, but not that of
the HA. The study in decalcified bone could confirm that not only inorganic components but
also collagen played a major role in this particular. However, the explanation for the
polarization of bone at low temperature, but not of HA is very limited. The presence of
residual CO3 or the structural orientation of the bone would be a fundamental of
this induction. Electrical storages by polarization from the electrophysiological standpoint
would be a result of mechanical stimulation important to remodeling of the bones which lead
to the known phenomena. In terms of clinical applications, polarization induction of
autografting bone would possibly enhance new bone formation around the implanted area of
bone defects upon the effects of the osteogenic cells in bone remodeling [16].In conclusion, our experiment could exhibit the phenomenon of polarization with certain
capability of electrical storages in rabbit femurs. The bones could be polarized even under
low temperature conditions, but this phenomenon did not occur with HA. In addition, both
collagen and inorganic components could play significant roles in polarization in different
temperature conditions.