Janice Brown1, Jibby E Kurichi2, Dawei Xie3, Qiang Pan4, Margaret G Stineman5. 1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA(∗). 2. Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA(†). 3. Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA(‡). 4. Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA(§). 5. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, 904 Blockley Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6021(‖). Electronic address: mstinema@exchange.upenn.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether instrumental activity of daily living (IADL) limitation stages can distinguish among elderly, community-dwelling persons with high likelihoods to have fallen once and more than once. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey. SETTING: A nationally representative sample from the Second Longitudinal Study of Aging (LSOA II). PARTICIPANTS: Included were 7401 community-dwelling persons 70 years of age and older. METHODS: The association of falling once and more than once within the past 12 months and 5 stages of increasing IADL limitation were explored by using a multinomial logistic regression model that controlled for demographics, education, perceived lack of home accessibility features, and health conditions. Sample proportions were weighted to reflect the prevalence in the U.S. population of 1994. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Subject recall of fall history. There were 3 categories for this variable: no fall, falling once, and falling more than once in the past 12 months. RESULTS: Compared with IADL stage 0, the adjusted relative risk ratio of falling once peaked in individuals at IADL stage II at 2.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-2.6), and those at IADL stage III had a relative risk ratio of 1.8 (95% CI, 1.3-2.6). The relative risk ratio of falling more than once was 2.1 (95% CI, 1.7-2.6), 4.0 (95% CI, 3.0-5.3), 3.7 (95% CI, 2.8-5.0), and 2.7 (95% CI, 1.5-4.9) for IADL stages I, II, III, and IV, respectively, when treating IADL stage 0 as reference. CONCLUSIONS: IADL limitation stages could represent a powerful and practical tool for screening patients in the U.S. elderly population according to fall risk. Clinical implementation and prospective testing for validation as a screening tool would be necessary.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether instrumental activity of daily living (IADL) limitation stages can distinguish among elderly, community-dwelling persons with high likelihoods to have fallen once and more than once. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey. SETTING: A nationally representative sample from the Second Longitudinal Study of Aging (LSOA II). PARTICIPANTS: Included were 7401 community-dwelling persons 70 years of age and older. METHODS: The association of falling once and more than once within the past 12 months and 5 stages of increasing IADL limitation were explored by using a multinomial logistic regression model that controlled for demographics, education, perceived lack of home accessibility features, and health conditions. Sample proportions were weighted to reflect the prevalence in the U.S. population of 1994. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Subject recall of fall history. There were 3 categories for this variable: no fall, falling once, and falling more than once in the past 12 months. RESULTS: Compared with IADL stage 0, the adjusted relative risk ratio of falling once peaked in individuals at IADL stage II at 2.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-2.6), and those at IADL stage III had a relative risk ratio of 1.8 (95% CI, 1.3-2.6). The relative risk ratio of falling more than once was 2.1 (95% CI, 1.7-2.6), 4.0 (95% CI, 3.0-5.3), 3.7 (95% CI, 2.8-5.0), and 2.7 (95% CI, 1.5-4.9) for IADL stages I, II, III, and IV, respectively, when treating IADL stage 0 as reference. CONCLUSIONS: IADL limitation stages could represent a powerful and practical tool for screening patients in the U.S. elderly population according to fall risk. Clinical implementation and prospective testing for validation as a screening tool would be necessary.
Authors: Margaret G Stineman; John T Henry-Sánchez; Jibby E Kurichi; Qiang Pan; Dawei Xie; Debra Saliba; Zi Zhang; Joel E Streim Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: Steven Paul Woods; Michael Weinborn; Aimee Velnoweth; Alexandra Rooney; Romola S Bucks Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2011-10-28 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Adam C Carle; David Cella; Li Cai; Seung W Choi; Paul K Crane; S McKay Curtis; Jonathan Gruhl; Jin-Shei Lai; Shubhabrata Mukherjee; Steven P Reise; Jeanne A Teresi; David Thissen; Eric J Wu; Ron D Hays Journal: Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 2.217
Authors: John T Henry-Sánchez; Jibby E Kurichi; Dawei Xie; Qiang Pan; Margaret G Stineman Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: Sean Hennessy; Jibby E Kurichi; Qiang Pan; Joel E Streim; Hillary R Bogner; Dawei Xie; Margaret G Stineman Journal: PM R Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Margaret G Stineman; Joel E Streim; Qiang Pan; Jibby E Kurichi; Sophia Miryam Schüssler-Fiorenza Rose; Dawei Xie Journal: PM R Date: 2014-05-02 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Jibby E Kurichi; Joel E Streim; Dawei Xie; Sean Hennessy; Ling Na; Debra Saliba; Qiang Pan; Pui L Kwong; Hillary R Bogner Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: John N Morris; Elizabeth P Howard; Knight Steel; Katherine Berg; Achille Tchalla; Amy Munankarmi; Daniel David Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2016-04-29 Impact factor: 3.921