Literature DB >> 24140073

Equilibrium contact angle or the most-stable contact angle?

F J Montes Ruiz-Cabello1, M A Rodríguez-Valverde2, M A Cabrerizo-Vílchez3.   

Abstract

It is well-established that the equilibrium contact angle in a thermodynamic framework is an "unattainable" contact angle. Instead, the most-stable contact angle obtained from mechanical stimuli of the system is indeed experimentally accessible. Monitoring the susceptibility of a sessile drop to a mechanical stimulus enables to identify the most stable drop configuration within the practical range of contact angle hysteresis. Two different stimuli may be used with sessile drops: mechanical vibration and tilting. The most stable drop against vibration should reveal the changeless contact angle but against the gravity force, it should reveal the highest resistance to slide down. After the corresponding mechanical stimulus, once the excited drop configuration is examined, the focus will be on the contact angle of the initial drop configuration. This methodology needs to map significantly the static drop configurations with different stable contact angles. The most-stable contact angle, together with the advancing and receding contact angles, completes the description of physically realizable configurations of a solid-liquid system. Since the most-stable contact angle is energetically significant, it may be used in the Wenzel, Cassie or Cassie-Baxter equations accordingly or for the surface energy evaluation.
© 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Equilibrium contact angle; Mechanical vibration; Sessile drops; The most-stable configuration; Tilting

Year:  2013        PMID: 24140073     DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2013.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Colloid Interface Sci        ISSN: 0001-8686            Impact factor:   12.984


  3 in total

1.  Dissipation of oscillatory contact lines using resonant mode scanning.

Authors:  Yi Xia; Paul H Steen
Journal:  NPJ Microgravity       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 4.415

2.  Controlling unequal surface energy results caused by test liquids: the case of UV/O3 Treated PET.

Authors:  Bilge Nazli Altay; Paul D Fleming; Md Arifur Rahman; Alexandra Pekarovicova; Bruce Myers; Cem Aydemir; Arif Karademir
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Macroscopic Model for Sessile Droplet Evaporation on a Flat Surface.

Authors:  Thijs W G van der Heijden; Anton A Darhuber; Paul van der Schoot
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 3.882

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.