Literature DB >> 24140038

Impact of induced pregnancies in the obstetrical outcome of twin pregnancies.

Ana Patrícia Domingues1, Sofia Raposo Dinis2, Adriana Belo3, Daniela Couto4, Etelvina Fonseca2, Paulo Moura5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare obstetric outcomes of induced twins with those spontaneously conceived.
DESIGN: A prospective observational study was conducted in twin pregnancies delivered over 16 years.
SETTING: A tertiary obstetric center with differentiated perinatal support. PATIENT(S): A total of 180 induced twins and 698 spontaneously conceived were included. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Comparison of demographic factors, obstetrical complications, gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery, birth weight, and immediate newborn outcome. RESULT(S): First-trimester bleeding was higher in the induced group (6.0% vs. 12.2%), as were gestational diabetes (4.4% vs. 8.3%) and discordant intrauterine growth (4.3% vs. 11.1%). Preterm premature rupture of membranes was less frequent (23.9% vs. 12.8%) as was preterm delivery ≤32 weeks (22.5% vs. 14.0%). Cesarean section rate was higher (50.6% vs. 63.9%). Other obstetrical complications, newborn data, and puerperal complications were not statistically different. Except for first-trimester bleeding (significantly associated with monochorionicity), these results were independent from chorionicity. Regarding the induced method (ovulation induction, IVF, or ICSI), IVF is a predictor for first-trimester bleeding and IVF or ICSI a predictor for cesarean section. CONCLUSION(S): The higher rates found with induced twins of first-trimester bleeding, gestational diabetes, and discordant growth do not contribute to different neonatal immediate outcomes and do not contribute to higher rates of prematurity, low birth weight, or other major perinatal complications.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Twins; induced reproduction; obstetrical outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24140038     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  6 in total

1.  Impact of Conception Method on Twin Pregnancy Course and Outcome.

Authors:  S Andrijasevic; J Dotlic; S Aksam; J Micic; M Terzic
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Maternal and neonatal outcomes in triplet gestations by trial of labor versus planned cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Danielle Peress; Annie Dude; Alan Peaceman; Lynn M Yee
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2018-01-07

3.  Neonatal outcomes among twins stratified by method of conception: secondary analysis of maternal fetal medicine (MFMU) network database.

Authors:  Jaimin S Shah; Susan Hosseini Nasab; Neil Chappell; Han-Yang Chen; Amy Schutt; Hector Mendez-Figueroa
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  [Influence of twin pregnancy by assisted reproductive technology on neonatal outcomes].

Authors:  Xiao-Hui Chen; Jin-Gai Zhu; Zhang-Bin Yu; Cheng-Yao Jiang; Shu-Ping Han
Journal:  Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-01

5.  Factors Associated with Failed Trial of Labor after Cesarean, among Women with Twin Gestation-A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Tzuria Peled; Hen Y Sela; Jordanna Joseph; Tal Martinotti; Sorina Grisaru-Granovsky; Misgav Rottenstreich
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  Neonatal outcomes among twins following assisted reproductive technology: an Australian population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Alex Y Wang; Nadom Safi; Fathalla Ali; Kei Lui; Zhuoyang Li; Mark P Umstad; Elizabeth A Sullivan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.