Literature DB >> 24139933

Risk score, causes, and clinical impact of failure of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions.

Eltigani Abdelaal1, Cynthia Brousseau-Provencher, Sarah Montminy, Guillaume Plourde, Jimmy MacHaalany, Yoann Bataille, Pierre Molin, Jean-Pierre Déry, Gérald Barbeau, Louis Roy, Éric Larose, Robert De Larochellière, Can M Nguyen, Guy Proulx, Olivier Costerousse, Olivier F Bertrand.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study the causes of and to develop a risk score for failure of transradial approach (TRA) for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
BACKGROUND: TRA-PCI failure has been reported in 5% to 10% of cases.
METHODS: TRA-PCI failure was categorized as primary (clinical reasons) or crossover failure. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of TRA-PCI failure, and an integer risk score was developed.
RESULTS: From January to June 2010, TRA-PCI was attempted in 1,609 (97.3%) consecutive patients, whereas 45 (2.7%) had primary TRA-PCI failure. Crossover TRA-PCI failure occurred in 30 (1.8%) patients. Causes of primary TRA-PCI failure included chronic radial artery occlusion (11%), previous coronary artery bypass graft (27%), and cardiogenic shock (20%). Causes for crossover TRA-PCI failure included: inadequate puncture in 17 patients (57%); radial artery spasm in 5 (17%); radial loop in 4 (13%); subclavian tortuosity in 2 (7%); and inadequate guide catheter support in 2 (7%) patients. Female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.95 to 5.26, p < 0.0001), previous coronary artery bypass graft (OR: 6.1; 95% CI: 3.63 to 10.05, p < 0.0001), and cardiogenic shock (OR: 11.2; 95% CI: 2.78 to 41.2, p = 0.0011) were independent predictors of TRA-PCI failure. Risk score values from 0 to 7 predicted a TRA-PCI failure rate from 2% to 80%.
CONCLUSIONS: In a high-volume radial center, 2.7% of patients undergoing PCI are excluded from initial TRA on clinical grounds, whereas crossover to femoral approach is required in only 1.8% of the cases. A new simple clinical risk score is developed to predict TRA-PCI failure.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CABG; CI; OR; PCI; TFA; TIMI; TRA; Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction; confidence interval(s); coronary artery bypass graft; crossover; failure; odds ratio(s); percutaneous coronary intervention; percutaneous coronary intervention(s); radial artery; transfemoral approach; transradial access; transradial approach

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24139933     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  14 in total

Review 1.  Ulnar Artery Catheterization: Is This Our Second Access Site or Is It Still Femoral?

Authors:  Mladen I Vidovich
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Outcomes of transradial primary percutaneous intervention from a tertiary cardiac centre in Turkey.

Authors:  Seref Ulucan; Zeynettin Kaya; Ahmet Keser; Hüseyin Katlandur; Hüseyin Özdil; İsmail Ateş; Mehmet S Ulgen
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

3.  Five years of a comprehensive ST-elevation myocardial infarction protocol and its association with sex disparities.

Authors:  Chetan P Huded; Anirudh Kumar; Nicholas Kassis; Michael J Johnson; Kathleen Kravitz; Abigail Brown; Marguerite Shanahan; Karen Trentanelli; Grant W Reed; Venu Menon; Amar Krishnaswamy; Stephen G Ellis; Damon M Kralovic; Stephen W Meldon; Samir R Kapadia; Umesh N Khot
Journal:  Eur Heart J Open       Date:  2021-08-20

4.  Frequency and Predictors of Radial Artery Occlusion in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Ussama Munir; Rozi Khan; Nouman Nazeer; Junaid Akhter; Anwaar Ul Hassan; Bashir Hanif
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-30

Review 5.  Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock Interventional Approach to Management in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories.

Authors:  Behnam N Tehrani; Abdulla A Damluji; Wayne B Batchelor
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2022

6.  Risk factors of failed transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions in Chaoshan Chinese: a locally retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Jing Hu; Xiangna Cai; Xin Wang; Lan Chen; Duanmin Xu; Jilin Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

7.  Predictors of Conversion from Radial Into Femoral Access in Cardiac Catheterization.

Authors:  Maria Salomé Carvalho; Rita Calé; Pedro de Araújo Gonçalves; Hugo Vinhas; Luís Raposo; Rui Teles; Cristina Martins; Henrique Mesquita Gabriel; Helder Pereira; Manuel Almeida
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Transradial access in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Stratified analysis by shock severity.

Authors:  Behnam N Tehrani; Abdulla A Damluji; Matthew W Sherwood; Carolyn Rosner; Alexander G Truesdell; Kelly C Epps; Edward Howard; Scott D Barnett; Anika Raja; Christopher R deFilippi; Charles E Murphy; Christopher M O'Connor; Wayne B Batchelor
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.585

Review 9.  Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Muhammad Rashid; Chun Shing Kwok; Samir Pancholy; Sanjay Chugh; Sasko A Kedev; Ivo Bernat; Karim Ratib; Adrian Large; Doug Fraser; James Nolan; Mamas A Mamas
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Efficacy and safety of a 260-cm Amplatz Super Stiff guidewire during transradial percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Xuguang Feng; Xiaoyun Zhang; Jun Dai; Jianping Bin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.