Literature DB >> 24139915

Development of oil-in-gelatin phantoms for viscoelasticity measurement in ultrasound shear wave elastography.

Man M Nguyen1, Shiwei Zhou, Jean-Luc Robert, Vijay Shamdasani, Hua Xie.   

Abstract

Because tissues consist of solid and fluid materials, their mechanical properties should be characterized in terms of both elasticity and viscosity. Although the elastic properties of tissue-mimicking phantoms have been extensively studied and well characterized in commercially available phantoms, their viscous properties have not been fully investigated. In this article, a set of 14 tissue-mimicking phantoms with different concentrations of gelatin and castor oil were fabricated and characterized in terms of acoustic and viscoelastic properties. The results indicate that adding castor oil to gelatin phantoms decreases shear modulus, but increases shear wave dispersion. For 3% gelatin phantoms containing 0%, 10%, 20% and 40% oil, the measured shear moduli are 2.01 ± 0.26, 1.68 ± 0.25, 1.10 ± 0.22 and 0.88 ± 0.17 kPa, and the Voigt-model coupled shear viscosities are 0.60 ± 0.11, 0.89 ± 0.07, 1.05 ± 0.11 and 1.06 ± 0.13 Pa·s, respectively. The results also confirm that increasing the gelatin concentration increases shear modulus. For phantoms containing 3%, 4%, 5%, 6% and 7% gelatin, the measured shear moduli are 2.01 ± 0.26, 3.10 ± 0.34, 4.18 ± 0.84, 8.05 ± 1.00 and 10.24 ± 1.80 kPa at 0% oil and 1.10 ± 0.22, 1.97 ± 0.20, 3.13 ± 0.63, 4.60 ± 0.60 and 8.43 ± 1.39 kPa at 20% oil, respectively. The phantom recipe developed in this study can be used in validating ultrasound shear wave elastography techniques for soft tissues.
Copyright © 2014 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Oil-in-gelatin phantom; Shear modulus; Shear viscosity; Shear wave dispersion; Shear wave elastography; Ultrasound elastography; Viscoelasticity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24139915     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.08.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  14 in total

1.  Mechanical contrast in spectroscopic magnetomotive optical coherence elastography.

Authors:  Adeel Ahmad; Pin-Chieh Huang; Nahil A Sobh; Paritosh Pande; Jongsik Kim; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Magnetomotive optical coherence elastography using magnetic particles to induce mechanical waves.

Authors:  Adeel Ahmad; Jongsik Kim; Nahil A Sobh; Nathan D Shemonski; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Non-contact single shot elastography using line field low coherence holography.

Authors:  Chih-Hao Liu; Alexander Schill; Chen Wu; Manmohan Singh; Kirill V Larin
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  A parametric evaluation of shear wave speeds estimated with time-of-flight calculations in viscoelastic media.

Authors:  Luke M Wiseman; Matthew W Urban; Robert J McGough
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Spatial localization of mechanical excitation affects spatial resolution, contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio in acoustic radiation force optical coherence elastography.

Authors:  Nichaluk Leartprapun; Rishyashring R Iyer; Colin D Mackey; Steven G Adie
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Improved Estimation of Ultrasound Thermal Strain Using Pulse Inversion Harmonic Imaging.

Authors:  Xuan Ding; Man M Nguyen; Isaac B James; Kacey G Marra; J Peter Rubin; Steven A Leers; Kang Kim
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Toward Standardized Acoustic Radiation Force (ARF)-Based Ultrasound Elasticity Measurements With Robotic Force Control.

Authors:  Muyinatu A Lediju Bell; Shalki Kumar; Lily Kuo; H Tutkun Sen; Iulian Iordachita; Peter Kazanzides
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Local Phase Velocity Based Imaging of Viscoelastic Phantoms and Tissues.

Authors:  Piotr Kijanka; Matthew W Urban
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Dispersion curve calculation in viscoelastic tissue-mimicking materials using non-parametric, parametric, and high-resolution methods.

Authors:  Piotr Kijanka; Matthew W Urban
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.890

10.  Viscoelastic Response Ultrasound Derived Relative Elasticity and Relative Viscosity Reflect True Elasticity and Viscosity: In Silico and Experimental Demonstration.

Authors:  Md Murad Hossain; Caterina M Gallippi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 2.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.