Literature DB >> 24139788

'Catching chlamydia': combining cash incentives and community pharmacy access for increased chlamydia screening, the view of young people.

Rhian M Parker1, Allison Bell2, Marian J Currie3, Louise S Deeks3, Gabrielle Cooper4, Sarah J Martin3, Rendry Del Rosario5, Jane S Hocking6, Francis J Bowden3.   

Abstract

In Australia and elsewhere, chlamydia screening rates for those aged between 16 and 30 years continue to be low. Innovative, age-appropriate approaches are necessary to increase chlamydia screening among this target group to prevent short- and long-term consequences of the infection such as pelvic inflammatory disease, chronic pelvic pain, ectopic pregnancy and infertility. Studies have demonstrated that offering chlamydia screening in community pharmacies may be a useful adjunct to current screening services. Approximately 90% of Australians visit a pharmacy at least once a year. Chlamydia screening and education in community pharmacies with remuneration may provide another option for opportunistic testing as part of a national chlamydia screening scheme. Compensation is an accepted practice in the field of research and has been demonstrated to improve adherence to health promotion activities. In 2011, a cross-sectional study of community pharmacy-based chlamydia screening offered in conjunction with an A$10 cash incentive to participate was conducted in the Australian Capital Territory. As part of this study young people were asked about their experience of, and views about, pharmacy-based chlamydia screening. The views of consented participants were collected using the one-page questionnaire consisting of 10 closed questions and one open-ended question. Participants completed the questionnaire when they returned their urine sample and before being given the cash incentive. Overall participants were highly satisfied with the pharmacy-based chlamydia screening service. Over 60% of questionnaire respondents felt that the payment did affect their decision to have the chlamydia test, and 23% stated that it made no difference. Young people reported that pharmacy-based screening is acceptable and convenient. Accessibility and the small cash incentive played significant roles in increasing participation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24139788     DOI: 10.1071/PY12135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust J Prim Health        ISSN: 1448-7527            Impact factor:   1.307


  2 in total

1.  Geographic disparities in accessing community pharmacies among vulnerable populations in the Greater Toronto Area.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Sasha Ramroop
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2018-08-02

2.  Evaluation of the Deadly Liver Mob program: insights for roll-out and scale-up of a pilot program to engage Aboriginal Australians in hepatitis C and sexual health education, screening, and care.

Authors:  Carla Treloar; Max Hopwood; Elena Cama; Veronica Saunders; L Clair Jackson; Melinda Walker; Catriona Ooi; Ashley Ubrihien; James Ward
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2018-02-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.