Literature DB >> 24139298

The value of postoperative visits for third molar removal.

Gino Inverso1, Hannah R Desrochers2, Bonnie L Padwa3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The clinical follow-up visit after third molar extraction has been cited as time consuming and of little benefit to patients. Although telephone follow-up has the potential to add value to the surgical management of third molars, sparse information exists on the financial context of this alternative. The purpose of this study was to show the change in value of third molar extraction with telephone follow-up through 1) measurement of the postoperative complication rate and 2) costs of telephone versus clinical follow-up.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bivariate comparisons were computed to assess for differences in follow-up type. Cost was calculated from a provider's perspective using micro-costing analysis that quantified cost differences between postoperative telephone and clinical follow-ups. Each visit type was divided into clinical activities and clinicians involved. Cost rates (dollars per minute) were derived for each clinician. Each clinical activity time was multiplied by clinician cost rate to derive an activity-based cost for each activity. Individual activity-based costs were summed to derive the total cost of telephone versus clinical follow-up visit.
RESULTS: Patients who had a telephone follow-up had a similar postoperative complication rate (2.1%) as those who had a clinical follow-up (1.9%; P = .94). The total cost estimates were $14.26 for telephone follow-up and $63.33 for clinical follow-up. Overall, there was a cost savings of $49.07 per patient, or a 77.4% decrease in cost, when using telephone follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Telephone follow-ups added value to the operative management of patients having third molar extractions by controlling for postoperative complication rate and decreasing cost of care.
Copyright © 2014 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24139298     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.08.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  4 in total

1.  Prophylactic removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Juliet Hounsome; Gerlinde Pilkington; James Mahon; Angela Boland; Sophie Beale; Eleanor Kotas; Tara Renton; Rumona Dickson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Randomized Study on Postoperative Intra-alveolar Betadine Irrigation Versus Chlorhexidine Irrigation on the Incidence of Occurrence of Alveolar Osteitis After Mandibular Third Molar Surgery.

Authors:  Rajat Mohanty; Chhaya Jha
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-03-14

3.  Prospective randomized single-blind study of post-operative bleeding after minor oral surgery in patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  Candan Efeoğlu; Aylin Sipahi Çalış; Zeki Karasu; Hüseyin Koca; Hayal Boyacıoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Postoperative online follow-up improves the quality of life of patients who undergo extraction of impacted madibular third molars: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Xianghuai Zheng; Jianjiang Zhao; Zhiping Wang; Bo Jia; Zhaoqiang Zhang; Jinyuan Guo; Zhaohui Duan; Xi Lin
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 3.573

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.