Literature DB >> 24139155

Prognostic factor analysis of vitrectomy for retinal detachment associated with myopic macular holes.

Laurence Shen Lim1, Andrew Tsai2, Doric Wong2, Edmund Wong2, Ian Yeo2, Boon Kwang Loh2, Chong Lye Ang2, Sze Guan Ong2, Shu Yen Lee3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the anatomic and functional outcomes in a cohort of subjects undergoing vitrectomy for retinal detachment (RD) resulting from myopic macular hole (MH) and to analyze the prognostic and surgical factors predicting retinal reattachment and MH closure.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: All patients who underwent vitrectomy for RD resulting from myopic MH between 2000 and 2009 at our center.
METHODS: Case records were reviewed at 6 months after surgery. Retinal reattachment and complete anatomic success, defined as retinal reattachment with MH closure, were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression models, including age, gender, duration of symptoms, spherical equivalent refraction (SE), internal limiting membrane peeling, tamponade choice, and concurrent scleral buckling, were constructed to assess associations with covariates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Retinal reattachment and complete anatomic success (retinal reattachment with MH closure).
RESULTS: In total, 114 subjects were analyzed. Most were women (n = 79 [69.3%]), and the mean age was 57.5±13.3 years. The mean SE was -9.88±6.37 diopters. At 6 months, 98 subjects (86.0%) demonstrated retinal reattachment, of whom 93 subjects required only 1 operation. Complete anatomic success was achieved in 61 subjects (53.5%), of whom 55 needed only 1 operation. Subjects with retinal reattachment had better best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; mean BCVA, 1.22±0.81 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] units) than those without (mean BCVA, 1.98±1.26 logMAR units; P < 0.001), and subjects with complete anatomic success had better BCVA (mean BCVA, 1.05±0.87 logMAR units) than those without (mean BCVA, 1.62±0.87 logMAR units; P < 0.001). In multivariate analyses, increasing age and the use of perfluoropropane (C3F8) tamponade were predictive of anatomic success (per 1-year increase: odds ratio [OR], 1.049; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.002-1.099; P = 0.04; and for tamponade: OR, 10.71; 95% CI, 1.08-106.29; P = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Vitrectomy is effective in the repair of RD resulting from MH in myopic eyes, with retinal reattachment achieved more frequently than MH closure. Retinal reattachment and MH closure are important for improving visual outcomes. Greater age at presentation and use of C3F8 are associated with a greater likelihood of anatomic success.
Copyright © 2014 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24139155     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.08.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  13 in total

1.  The management of macular hole retinal detachment and macular retinoschisis in pathological myopia; a UK collaborative study.

Authors:  Heidi Laviers; Ji-Peng Olivia Li; Anna Grabowska; Stephen J Charles; David Charteris; Richard J Haynes; D Alistair H Laidlaw; David H Steel; David Yorston; Tom H Williamson; Hadi Zambarakji
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Inverted multi-layer internal limiting membrane flap for macular hole retinal detachment in high myopia.

Authors:  Xianggui Wang; Ying Zhu; Huizhuo Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 3.  Macular buckle technique in myopic traction maculopathy: a 16-year review of the literature and a comparison with vitreous surgery.

Authors:  Micol Alkabes; Carlos Mateo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Comparison of the Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique and the Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Macular Hole with Retinal Detachment.

Authors:  Takehiro Matsumura; Yoshihiro Takamura; Takeshi Tomomatsu; Shogo Arimura; Makoto Gozawa; Akira Kobori; Masaru Inatani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling versus inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for macular hole-induced retinal detachment: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing Yuan; Ling-Lin Zhang; Yu-Jie Lu; Meng-Yao Han; Ai-Hua Yu; Xiao-Jun Cai
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.209

6.  Vitrectomy in patients 85 years of age and older: surgical outcomes and visual prognosis.

Authors:  Roi Anteby; Aya Barzelay; Adiel Barak
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.458

7.  Double Internal Limiting Membrane Insertion for Macular Hole-Associated Retinal Detachment.

Authors:  San-Ni Chen; Chung-May Yang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-30       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Clinical Investigation of the Posterior scleral contraction to Treat Macular Traction Maculopathy in Highly Myopic Eyes.

Authors:  An-Peng Pan; Ting Wan; Shuang-Qian Zhu; Liang Dong; An-Quan Xue
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  A meta-analysis of vitrectomy with or without internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole retinal detachment in the highly myopic eyes.

Authors:  Xinxiao Gao; Jia Guo; Xin Meng; Jun Wang; Xiaoyan Peng; Yasushi Ikuno
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 10.  Vitrectomy in high myopia: a narrative review.

Authors:  Michele Coppola; Alessandro Rabiolo; Maria Vittoria Cicinelli; Giuseppe Querques; Francesco Bandello
Journal:  Int J Retina Vitreous       Date:  2017-10-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.