Literature DB >> 24139153

The effect of socioeconomic deprivation on corneal graft survival in the United Kingdom.

Paul Y Chua1, Augusto Azuara-Blanco2, William Hulme3, Mark N A Jones3, Mohammed Sohaib Mustafa4, Stephen B Kaye5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of socioeconomic deprivation on cornea graft survival in the United Kingdom.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: All the recipients (n = 13,644) undergoing their first penetrating keratoplasty (PK) registered on the United Kingdom Transplant Registry between April 1999 and March 2011 were included.
METHODS: Data of patients' demographic details, indications, graft size, corneal vascularization, surgical complication, rejection episodes, and postoperative medication were collected at the time of surgery and 1, 2, and 5 years postoperatively. Patients with endophthalmitis were excluded from the study. Patients' home postcodes were used to determine the socioeconomic status using a well-validated deprivation index in the United Kingdom: A Classification of Residential Neighborhoods (ACORN). Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to evaluate the influence of ACORN categories on 5-year graft survival, and the Bonferroni method was used to adjust for multiple comparisons. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients' socioeconomic deprivation status and corneal graft failure.
RESULTS: A total of 13,644 patients received their first PK during the study periods. A total of 1685 patients (13.36%) were lost to follow-up, leaving 11,821 patients (86.64%) for analysis. A total of 138 of the 11,821 patients (1.17%) developed endophthalmitis. The risk of graft failure within 5 years for the patients classified as hard-pressed was 1.3 times that of the least deprived (hazard ratio, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.5; P = 0.003) after adjusting for confounding factors and indications. There were no statistically significant differences between the causes of graft failure and the level of deprivation (P = 0.14).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients classified as hard-pressed had an increased risk of graft failure within 5 years compared with the least deprived patients.
Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24139153     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.07.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  4 in total

1.  Corneal transplantation: A new view of life.

Authors:  Fardin Amiri; Shahrzad Ghiyasvandian; Elham Navab; Masoumeh Zakerimoghadam
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2017-04-25

2.  United Kingdom Diabetic Retinopathy Electronic Medical Record (UK DR EMR) Users Group: report 4, real-world data on the impact of deprivation on the presentation of diabetic eye disease at hospital services.

Authors:  Alastair K Denniston; Aaron Y Lee; Cecilia S Lee; David P Crabb; Clare Bailey; Peck-Lin Lip; Paul Taylor; Maria Pikoula; Esther Cook; Toks Akerele; Richard Antcliff; Christopher Brand; Usha Chakravarthy; Randhir Chavan; Narendra Dhingra; Louise Downey; Haralabos Eleftheriadis; Faruque Ghanchi; Rehna Khan; Vineeth Kumar; Aires Lobo; Andrew Lotery; Geeta Menon; Rajarshi Mukherjee; Helen Palmer; Sudeshna Patra; Bobby Paul; Dawn A Sim; James Stephen Talks; Elizabeth Wilkinson; Adnan Tufail; Catherine A Egan
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Survival Outcome and Prognostic Factors of Corneal Transplantation: A 15-Year Retrospective Cohort Study at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital.

Authors:  Usanee Reinprayoon; Parinya Srihatrai; Vannarut Satitpitakul; Vilavun Puangsricharern; Thitima Wungcharoen; Ngamjit Kasetsuwan
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-18

4.  Corneal transplantation at Tenwek Hospital, Kenya, East Africa: Analysis of outcomes and associated patient socioeconomic characteristics.

Authors:  Michael C Chen; Allen R Kunselman; Christy M Stetter; Sadeer B Hannush; Benjamin W Roberts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.