Literature DB >> 24138841

Molecular and protein markers for clinical decision making in breast cancer: today and tomorrow.

Nadia Harbeck1, Karl Sotlar2, Rachel Wuerstlein3, Sophie Doisneau-Sixou4.   

Abstract

In early breast cancer (eBC), established clinicopathological factors are not sufficient for clinical decision making particularly regarding adjuvant chemotherapy since substantial over- or undertreatment may occur. Thus, novel protein- and molecular markers have been put forward as decision aids. Since these potential prognosis and/or predictive tests differ substantially regarding their methodology, analytical and clinical validation, this review attempts to summarize the essential facts for clinicians. This review focuses on those markers which are the most advanced so far in their development towards routine clinical application, i.e. two protein markers (i.e. uPA/PAI-1 and IHC4) and six molecular multigene tests (i.e. Mammaprint®, Oncotype DX®, PAM50, Endopredict®, the 97-gene genomic grade, and 76 gene Rotterdam signatures). Next to methodological aspects, we summarized the clinical evidences, in particular the main prospective clinical trials which have already been fully recruited (i.e. MINDACT, TAILORx, WSG PLAN B) or are still ongoing (i.e. RxPONDER/SWOG S1007, WSG-ADAPT). Last but not least, this review points out the key elements for clinicians to select one test among the wide panel of proposed assays, for a specific population of patients in term of level of evidence, analytical and clinical validity as well as cost effectiveness.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Endopredict®; Mammaprint®; Multigene tests; Oncotype DX®; PAM50; uPA/PAI-1

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24138841     DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev        ISSN: 0305-7372            Impact factor:   12.111


  36 in total

Review 1.  Cognitive effects of endocrine therapy for breast cancer: keep calm and carry on?

Authors:  Wilbert Zwart; Huub Terra; Sabine C Linn; Sanne B Schagen
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Novel Predictors of Breast Cancer Survival Derived from miRNA Activity Analysis.

Authors:  Vasily N Aushev; Eunjee Lee; Jun Zhu; Kalpana Gopalakrishnan; Qian Li; Susan L Teitelbaum; James Wetmur; Davide Degli Esposti; Hector Hernandez-Vargas; Zdenko Herceg; Humberto Parada; Regina M Santella; Marilie D Gammon; Jia Chen
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Association of microRNA-93, 190, 200b and receptor status in core biopsies from stage III breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Agnieszka Kolacinska; Jan Morawiec; Zofia Pawlowska; Janusz Szemraj; Bożena Szymanska; Beata Malachowska; Zbigniew Morawiec; Alina Morawiec-Sztandera; Lukasz Pakula; Robert Kubiak; Izabela Zawlik
Journal:  DNA Cell Biol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.311

4.  Biomarker panels in ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Glen C Jickling; Frank R Sharp
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  The histone chaperone HJURP is a new independent prognostic marker for luminal A breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Rocío Montes de Oca; Zachary A Gurard-Levin; Frédérique Berger; Haniya Rehman; Elise Martel; Armelle Corpet; Leanne de Koning; Isabelle Vassias; Laurence O W Wilson; Didier Meseure; Fabien Reyal; Alexia Savignoni; Bernard Asselain; Xavier Sastre-Garau; Geneviève Almouzni
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 6.603

6.  The Predictive Link between Matrix and Metastasis.

Authors:  L E Barney; L E Jansen; S R Polio; S Galarza; M E Lynch; S R Peyton
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Eng       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.163

7.  Increased angiogenesis is associated with a 32-gene expression signature and 6p21 amplification in aggressive endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Ingunn M Stefansson; Maria Raeder; Elisabeth Wik; Monica Mannelqvist; Kanthida Kusonmano; Gøril Knutsvik; Ingfrid Haldorsen; Jone Trovik; Anne M Øyan; Karl-H Kalland; Anne Cathrine Staff; Helga B Salvesen; Lars A Akslen
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-04-30

8.  Prospective cohort study using the breast cancer spheroid model as a predictor for response to neoadjuvant therapy--the SpheroNEO study.

Authors:  Kathrin Halfter; Nina Ditsch; Hans-Christian Kolberg; Holger Fischer; Tanja Hauzenberger; Franz Edler von Koch; Ingo Bauerfeind; Gunter von Minckwitz; Ilona Funke; Alexander Crispin; Barbara Mayer
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Accurate prediction of breast cancer survival through coherent voting networks with gene expression profiling.

Authors:  Marco Pellegrini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Development of a Novel Prognostic Signature Based on Antigen Processing and Presentation in Patients with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Aoshuang Qi; Mingyi Ju; Yinfeng Liu; Jia Bi; Qian Wei; Miao He; Minjie Wei; Lin Zhao
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.201

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.