Literature DB >> 24138682

Predicting cancer mortality: Developing a new cancer care variable using mixed methods and the quasi-statistical approach.

Susan L Zickmund1, Suzanne Yang, Edward P Mulvey, James E Bost, Laura A Shinkunas, Douglas R LaBrecque.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the value of using a variable derived from qualitative analysis in subsequent quantitative analyses. DATA SOURCES/STUDY
SETTING: Mixed methods data were combined with 10-year mortality outcomes. Participants with cancer were recruited from services at a large teaching hospital, and mortality data were from the Social Security Death Index. STUDY
DESIGN: An observational concurrent or convergent mixed methods design was used to collect demographics and structured ratings along with qualitative data from 909 cancer patients at baseline. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
METHODS: Coding rules for qualitative data were defined for open-ended responses from cancer participants speaking about their view of self, and a variable was numerically coded for each case. Mortality outcomes were matched to baseline data, including the view of self variable. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Individuals with an improved view of self had a significantly lower mortality rate than those for whom it was worse or unchanged, even when adjusting for age, gender, and cancer stage.
CONCLUSIONS: Statistical analysis of qualitative data is feasible and can identify new predictors with health services' implications associated with cancer mortality. Future studies should consider the value of testing coded qualitative variables in relation with key health care outcomes. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; mixed methods; prognosis; quasi-statistical; view of self

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24138682      PMCID: PMC4097837          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  24 in total

Review 1.  Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data.

Authors:  C Pope; S Ziebland; N Mays
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-08

2.  Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices.

Authors:  Michael D Fetters; Leslie A Curry; John W Creswell
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Sample size in qualitative research.

Authors:  M Sandelowski
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.228

5.  The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure.

Authors:  M Bergner; R A Bobbitt; W B Carter; B S Gilson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Hepatitis C virus-infected patients report communication problems with physicians.

Authors:  Susan Zickmund; Stephen L Hillis; Mitchell J Barnett; Laura Ippolito; Douglas R LaBrecque
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 17.425

7.  The hospital anxiety and depression scale.

Authors:  A S Zigmond; R P Snaith
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 6.392

8.  Baseline psychosocial predictors of survival in localized melanoma.

Authors:  Ulla-Sisko Lehto; Markku Ojanen; Tadeusz Dyba; Arpo Aromaa; Pirkko Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.006

9.  Pessimism, age, and cancer mortality.

Authors:  R Schulz; J Bookwala; J E Knapp; M Scheier; G M Williamson
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1996-06

10.  Why, and how, mixed methods research is undertaken in health services research in England: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Alicia O'Cathain; Elizabeth Murphy; Jon Nicholl
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  4 in total

1.  Integrating mixed methods in health services and delivery system research.

Authors:  William L Miller; Benjamin F Crabtree; Michael I Harrison; Mary L Fennell
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices.

Authors:  Michael D Fetters; Leslie A Curry; John W Creswell
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Testing a very low-carbohydrate adaption of the Diabetes Prevention Program among adults with prediabetes: study protocol for the Lifestyle Education about prediabetes (LEAP) trial.

Authors:  Dina H Griauzde; Alison O'Brien; William S Yancy; Caroline R Richardson; Jamie Krinock; Melissa DeJonckheere; Deanna J M Isaman; Kaitlyn Vanias; Samuel Shopinski; Laura R Saslow
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 2.728

4.  Using a Whole Person Approach to Support People With Cancer: A Longitudinal, Mixed-Methods Service Evaluation.

Authors:  Marie J Polley; Rachel Jolliffe; Emily Boxell; Catherine Zollman; Sarah Jackson; Helen Seers
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2016-04-09       Impact factor: 3.279

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.