Literature DB >> 24138497

Plerixafor on-demand combined with chemotherapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: significant improvement in peripheral blood stem cells mobilization and harvest with no increase in costs.

Giuseppe Milone1, Massimo Martino, Andrea Spadaro, Salvatore Leotta, Annalia Di Marco, Potito Scalzulli, Alessandra Cupri, Valentina Di Martina, Elena Schinocca, Eleonora Spina, Giovanni Tripepi.   

Abstract

To date, no prospective study on Plerixafor 'on-demand' in combination with chemotherapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been reported. We present an interim analysis of the first prospective study in which Plerixafor was administered on-demand in patients affected by multiple myeloma and lymphoma who received high dose cyclophosphamide or DHAP (dexamethasone, cytarabine, cisplatin) plus G-CSF to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). One hundred and two patients were evaluable for response. A cohort of 240 patients receiving the same mobilizing chemotherapy was retrospectively studied. Failure to mobilize CD34(+) cells in peripheral blood was reduced by 'on-demand' strategy compared to conventional mobilization; from 13·0 to 3·0% (P = 0·004). Failure to harvest CD34(+) cells 2 × 10(6) /kg decreased from 20·9 to 4·0% (P = 0·0001). The on-demand Plerixafor strategy also resulted in a lower rate of mobilization failure (P = 0·03) and harvest failure (P = 0·0008) when compared to a 'bias-adjusted set of controls'. Evaluation of economic costs of the two strategies showed that the overall cost of the two treatments were comparable when salvage mobilizations were taken into account. When in combination with cyclophosphamide or DHAP plus G-CSF, the 'on-demand' use of Plerixafor showed, in comparison to conventionally treated patients, a significant improvement in mobilization of PBSC with no increase in overall cost.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  apheresis harvest; peripheral blood stem cell mobilization; plerixafor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24138497     DOI: 10.1111/bjh.12606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  14 in total

1.  Upfront plerixafor plus G-CSF versus cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF for stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: efficacy and cost analysis study.

Authors:  S Afifi; N G Adel; S Devlin; E Duck; J Vanak; H Landau; D J Chung; N Lendvai; A Lesokhin; N Korde; L Reich; O Landgren; S Giralt; H Hassoun
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 5.483

2.  The timing of plerixafor addition to G-Csf and chemotherapy affects immunological recovery after autologous stem cell transplant in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Antonio Curti; Roberto M Lemoli; Giulia Tolomelli; Katia Mancuso; Paola Tacchetti; Francesca Patriarca; Monica Galli; Lucia Pantani; Beatrice Zannetti; Maria Rosa Motta; Simonetta Rizzi; Elisa Dan; Barbara Sinigaglia; Valeria Giudice; Andrea Olmo; Mario Arpinati; Gabriella Chirumbolo; Renato Fanin; Russell E Lewis; Laura Paris; Francesca Bonifazi; Michele Cavo
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 3.  Supportive care in patients with acute leukaemia: historical perspectives.

Authors:  Giovanna Cannas; Xavier Thomas
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 4.  Mobilization, Isolation and Characterization of Stem Cells from Peripheral Blood: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Natali Yosupov; Haim Haimov; Gintaras Juodzbalys
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2017-03-31

5.  Plerixafor for autologous stem-cell mobilization and transplantation for patients in Ontario.

Authors:  C T Kouroukis; N P Varela; C Bredeson; J Kuruvilla; A Xenocostas
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Platelet Count before Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization Is Associated with the Need for Plerixafor But Not with the Collection Result.

Authors:  Marc-Andrea Baertsch; Katharina Kriegsmann; Petra Pavel; Thomas Bruckner; Michael Hundemer; Mark Kriegsmann; Anthony D Ho; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Patrick Wuchter
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 7.  Use of Plerixafor for Stem Cell Mobilization in the Setting of Autologous and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantations: An Update.

Authors:  Yavuz M Bilgin
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2021-06-02

8.  Successful "on-demand" plerixafor for autologous peripheral blood stem-cells transplantation for relapsed/refractory germ cell tumors.

Authors:  Andrea Corbingi; Elisabetta Metafuni; Mariantonietta Di Salvatore; Rossana Putzulu; Patrizia Chiusolo; Giovanni Schinzari; Giuseppina Massini; Ernesto Rossi; Gina Zini; Alessandra Cassano; Simona Sica; Nicola Piccirillo
Journal:  J Clin Apher       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 2.605

9.  Predicting poor peripheral blood stem cell collection in patients with multiple myeloma receiving pre-transplant induction therapy with novel agents and mobilized with cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor: results from a Gruppo Italiano Malattie EMatologiche dell'Adulto Multiple Myeloma Working Party study.

Authors:  Pellegrino Musto; Vittorio Simeon; Alberto Grossi; Francesca Gay; Sara Bringhen; Alessandra Larocca; Roberto Guariglia; Giuseppe Pietrantuono; Oreste Villani; Giovanni D'Arena; Carmela Cuomo; Clelia Musto; Fortunato Morabito; Maria Teresa Petrucci; Massimo Offidani; Elena Zamagni; Paola Tacchetti; Concetta Conticello; Giuseppe Milone; Antonio Palumbo; Michele Cavo; Mario Boccadoro
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 6.832

10.  Stem Cell Mobilization with G-CSF versus Cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF in Mexican Children.

Authors:  José Eugenio Vázquez Meraz; José Arellano-Galindo; Armando Martínez Avalos; Emma Mendoza-García; Elva Jiménez-Hernández
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 5.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.