Ian Brissette1, Kathleen Wales, Meghan O'Connell. 1. Research Scientist, (ifb01@health.state.ny.us), New York State Department of Health, 1084 Corning Tower Empire State Plaza, Albany, NY 12237.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Addressing the limitations of existing Local Wellness Policies (LWPs) and promoting their implementation remain priorities for health and education agencies. One gap has been the absence of a standard assessment to support LWP revision. During planning for an initiative to improve school nutrition and physical education policy, the Wellness School Assessment Tool (WellSAT) was evaluated. METHODS: Five public health practitioners used WellSAT to assess 50 LWPs. A randomized, counterbalanced design ensured each LWP was coded twice by separate raters. Models evaluated the extent to which WellSAT ratings reflected differences in the LWPs and order, familiarity and rater effects. During field testing, 18 public health practitioners used WellSAT as part of a statewide public health initiative. RESULTS: In pilot testing the majority of the variability in WellSAT scores (median = 88%; range = 76% to 100%) was attributable to differences between policies. Correlations between independent raters' strength and comprehensiveness scores were strong, r = .88 and r = .77, respectively. During field testing, WellSAT was well accepted by public health practitioners and members of the school community. CONCLUSIONS: WellSAT represents a reliable and feasible tool for health and education agencies to use in improving LWPs and aligning them with recognized standards. Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
BACKGROUND: Addressing the limitations of existing Local Wellness Policies (LWPs) and promoting their implementation remain priorities for health and education agencies. One gap has been the absence of a standard assessment to support LWP revision. During planning for an initiative to improve school nutrition and physical education policy, the Wellness School Assessment Tool (WellSAT) was evaluated. METHODS: Five public health practitioners used WellSAT to assess 50 LWPs. A randomized, counterbalanced design ensured each LWP was coded twice by separate raters. Models evaluated the extent to which WellSAT ratings reflected differences in the LWPs and order, familiarity and rater effects. During field testing, 18 public health practitioners used WellSAT as part of a statewide public health initiative. RESULTS: In pilot testing the majority of the variability in WellSAT scores (median = 88%; range = 76% to 100%) was attributable to differences between policies. Correlations between independent raters' strength and comprehensiveness scores were strong, r = .88 and r = .77, respectively. During field testing, WellSAT was well accepted by public health practitioners and members of the school community. CONCLUSIONS: WellSAT represents a reliable and feasible tool for health and education agencies to use in improving LWPs and aligning them with recognized standards. Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Entities:
Keywords:
evaluation; health policy; public health
Authors: Pamela K Hoffman; Cynthia S Davey; Nicole Larson; Katherine Y Grannon; Carlie Hanson; Marilyn S Nanney Journal: Health Educ Res Date: 2016-02-05
Authors: Nicole Larson; Cynthia Davey; Pamela Hoffman; Martha Y Kubik; Marilyn S Nanney Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2015-05-20 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Marlene B Schwartz; Elizabeth Piekarz-Porter; Margaret A Read; Jamie F Chriqui Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2020-07-02 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Tanya M Horacek; Marlei Simon; Elif Dede Yildirim; Adrienne A White; Karla P Shelnutt; Kristin Riggsbee; Melissa D Olfert; Jesse Stabile Morrell; Anne E Mathews; Wenjun Zhou; Tandalayo Kidd; Kendra Kattelmann; Geoffrey Greene; Lisa Franzen-Castle; Sarah Colby; Carol Byrd-Bredbenner; Onikia Brown Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-03-04 Impact factor: 3.390