| Literature DB >> 24138155 |
J Martín-Tereso1, H ter Wijlen, H van Laar, M W A Verstegen.
Abstract
Milk fever is one of the most important metabolic diseases in dairy cattle. Reducing the dietary cation/anion balance (DCAD) with anionic salts is a common prevention strategy. However, many small European farms cannot use total mixed rations (TMR) in the close-up period. Including anionic salts in compound feeds can result in feed refusals and moderate inclusions to preserve feed palatability results in insufficient DCAD reduction. Rumen-protected rice bran induces the adaptation of Ca metabolism in dairy cows by a reduction of Ca intake and by a reduction of the availability of dietary Ca. In the presence of a negative control, rumen-protected rice bran (2.8 kg/day) was compared with a lowered DCAD diet (from 269 to 4 meq/kg DM) in their effect to prevent milk fever. In a randomized block design, 45 multiparous Holstein cows joined the trial sequentially from 21 days before the expected calving date and were observed until the 8th week of lactation. Feed and nutrient intakes were recorded, and Ca, P, Mg in serum and urine, urine pH, serum NEFA and milk production in early lactation were compared. Feeding rumen-protected rice bran before calving improved the recovery of calcaemia after calving and had a positive effect on DMI after calving. The moderately low DCAD diet did not positively influence serum Ca at calving. Calcaemia recovered even later than in control, and cows showed reduced DMI post-calving and higher NEFA levels in the first 36 h after calving. This moderate reduction of DCAD did not provide an intermediate prevention level indicating that DCAD needs to be reduced to the recommended levels to prevent milk fever. Rumen-protected rice bran may be a suitable feed to reduce hypocalcaemia post-partum and can be included in pre-calving compound feeds representing a palatable alternative to anionic salts. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal NutritionEntities:
Keywords: DCAD; calcium homoeostasis; milk fever; phytic acid; rice bran
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24138155 PMCID: PMC4282373 DOI: 10.1111/jpn.12137
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) ISSN: 0931-2439 Impact factor: 2.130
Nutrient analyses of the experimental compound feeds used in the trial
| Control | Rice bran | Low DCAD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DM | 903 | 889 | 894 |
| Ash | 78 | 85 | 115 |
| CP | 206 | 224 | 231 |
| Starch | 143 | 245 | 112 |
| Sugars | 74 | 98 | 78 |
| CF | 165 | 81 | 119 |
| NDF | 352 | 236 | 268 |
| Ca | 7.4 | 5.5 | 22.1 |
| P | 4.5 | 11.5 | 5.8 |
| Mg | 4.8 | 7.5 | 9.2 |
| Na | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.6 |
| K | 10.9 | 15.2 | 8.6 |
| Cl | 3.2 | 2.9 | 29 |
| S | 3.6 | 4 | 8.7 |
| DCAD | 73 | 162 | −1041 |
Nutrients expressed as g/kg DM except for DCAD meq/kg DM.
Feed intakes and nutrient content of the feed intakes (Lsmeans)
| Close-up (from day −10 to calving) | Early lactation (from day 1 to 10) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Rice bran | Low DCAD | SEM | Control | Rice bran | Low DCAD | SEM | |
| DMI (kg) | 12.94 | 13.09 | 13.48 | 0.372 | ab 14.05 | a 15.64 | b 13.03 | 0.564 |
| Forage DMI (kg) | 9.95 | 9.97 | 10.38 | 0.355 | a 11.44 | a 12.61 | b 10.15 | 0.448 |
| Concentrate DMI (kg) | 2.99 | 3.12 | 3.11 | 0.127 | 2.63 | 3.02 | 2.88 | 0.237 |
| Ash | a 69 | b 70 | c 78 | 0.4 | 64 | 64 | 64 | 0.3 |
| CP | a 124 | b 130 | b 130 | 1.8 | 120 | 121 | 124 | 1.5 |
| Starch | a 160 | b 185 | c 145 | 4.0 | 228 | 227 | 226 | 6.2 |
| Sugars | a 30 | b 37 | a 32 | 1.3 | a 28 | a 28 | b 32 | 1.4 |
| CF | a 230 | b 208 | a 222 | 3.0 | 183 | 182 | 178 | 4.8 |
| NDF | a 451 | b 420 | c 436 | 4.7 | 369 | 368 | 359 | 8.1 |
| Ca | a 4.0 | a 4.2 | b 7.7 | 0.33 | 4.45 | 4.52 | 4.67 | 0.10 |
| P | a 3.1 | b 4.9 | c 3.5 | 0.08 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 0.05 |
| Mg | a 2.3 | b 3.0 | c 3.4 | 0.07 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 0.05 |
| Na | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 0.02 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.02 |
| K | a 17.3 | b 18.3 | c 16.9 | 0.12 | 16.8 | 16.7 | 16.7 | 0.12 |
| Cl | a 3.4 | a 3.4 | b 9.6 | 0.15 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 0.03 |
| S | a 2.2 | a 2.3 | b 3.4 | 0.05 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.02 |
| DCAD | a 269 | a 287 | b 4 | 8.5 | 272 | 269 | 269 | 3.0 |
Nutrients expressed as g/kg DM except for DCAD meq/kg DM.
Different letters indicate differences with a p < 0.05.
Fig 1Daily DMI from 10 days before calving to 10 days after calving. Difference in letters indicates significant differences with p < 0.05.
Calving observations of calcaemia, odds ratio for calving problems and colostrum production
| Control | Rice bran | Low DCAD | SEM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca nadir (m | 1.67 | 1.76 | 1.75 | 0.077 |
| OR Ca infusion at calving | 0.33 | 0.29 | 0.33 | 0.562 |
| OR assisted calving | 0.40 | 0.64 | 0.53 | 0.534 |
| OR oedema | 0.27 | 0.43 | 0.40 | 0.550 |
| Colostrum production (l) | 7.61 | 6.91 | 5.90 | 1.107 |
OR, Odds ratio.
No significant differences between the treatments.
logit(p) = log[p/(1 − p)].
SEM is reported in the logit transformed because confidence intervals are not symmetric.
Serum parameters (mm)
| Ca | P | Mg | NEFA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Close-up (3 weeks before calving) | ||||
| Control | AB 2.48 | AB 2.16 | 0.972 | 0.143 |
| Rice bran | A 2.45 | A 2.26 | 0.953 | 0.154 |
| Low DCAD | B 2.51 | B 2.12 | 0.963 | 0.179 |
| SEM | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.0043 | 0.0149 |
| Hours after calving (calving – 48 h after) | ||||
| Control | A 1.93 | 1.51 | 0.977 | AB 0.546 |
| Rice bran | B 2.08 | 1.63 | 0.983 | A 0.477 |
| Low DCAD | AB 1.99 | 1.61 | 0.965 | B 0.638 |
| SEM | 0.014 | 0.010 | 0.0078 | 0.0249 |
| Early lactation (4 weeks after calving) | ||||
| Control | A 2.47 | 1.80 | 0.989 | 0.445 |
| Rice bran | A 2.48 | 1.74 | 0.956 | 0.468 |
| Low DCAD | B 2.39 | 1.74 | 0.927 | 0.434 |
| SEM | 0.013 | 0.006 | 0.0069 | 0.0196 |
Difference in capital letters indicates significant differences with p < 0.10. No differences were found with a p < 0.05.
SEM reported mathematically transformed as confidence interval is not symmetric.
Fig 2Evolution of serum NEFA from 3 weeks before calving to 4 weeks after calving. Difference in letters indicates significant differences with p < 0.05.
Fig 3Evolution of serum Ca from calving to 4 weeks after calving. Difference in letters indicates significant differences with p < 0.05.
Fig 4Evolution of serum P from calving to 4 weeks after calving. Difference in letters indicates significant differences with p < 0.05.
Fig 5Evolution of serum Mg from calving to 4 weeks after calving. Difference in letters indicates significant differences with p < 0.05.
Urine parameters in the 3 weeks before and after calving
| Creatinine | Ca/creat | P/creat | Mg/creat | pH | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Close-up (3 weeks) | |||||
| Control | 1.46 | a 0.65 | 0.08 | 7.79 | a 8.35 |
| Rice bran | 1.39 | a 0.61 | 0.11 | 8.09 | a 8.33 |
| Low DCAD | 1.46 | b 1.40 | 0.08 | 7.83 | b 7.87 |
| SEM | 0.016 | 0.045 | 0.119 | 0.607 | 0.018 |
| Lactation (3 weeks) | |||||
| Control | 0.98 | 0.78 | 5.17 | 10.44 | 8.27 |
| Rice bran | 1.01 | 0.57 | 5.49 | 9.19 | 8.25 |
| Low DCAD | 1.06 | 0.53 | 5.15 | 9.10 | 8.27 |
| SEM | 0.016 | 0.037 | 0.023 | 1.112 | 0.045 |
Creatinine in g/l. Ca, P and Mg in mm.
Difference in letters indicates significant differences with p < 0.05.
SEM is reported mathematically transformed because confidence intervals are not symmetric.
Milk production in the first 8 weeks of lactation
| Control | Rice bran | Low DCAD | SEM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milk yield (kg) | 39.9 | 38.7 | 37.7 | 1.10 |
| Fat corrected milk 4% (kg) | 40.4 | 41.3 | 38.4 | 1.14 |
| Protein content (%) | 3.21 | 3.29 | 3.26 | 0.039 |
| Fat content (%) | 4.11 | 4.32 | 4.15 | 0.084 |
| Lactose content (%) | b 4.50 | a 4.59 | a 4.58 | 0.027 |
| Urea content (mg/dl) | 17.46 | 19.69 | 21.98 | 3.137 |
| Protein yield (g) | 1270 | 1264 | 1226 | 35.6 |
| Fat yield (g) | 1616 | 1652 | 1536 | 45.7 |
| Lactose yield (g) | 1804 | 1782 | 1741 | 55.2 |
| Daily urea (g) | ab 7.11 | b 7.64 | a 6.59 | 0.332 |
Difference in letters indicates significant differences with p < 0.05.