| Literature DB >> 24137317 |
Huan-Huan Zhang1, Tai-Ze Yuan, Jian Li, Yin Liang, Lai-Ji Huang, Jia-Cai Ye, Rong-Hui Zheng, Guo-Feng Xie, Xiu-Ping Zhang.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to explore the effects of erlotinib combined with radiation on human nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) radiosensitivity using the CNE1 and CNE2 cell lines. Human NPC cells were treated with erlotinib and/or radiation. The effect of erlotinib on the radiosensitivity of the cells was detected using a clonogenic cell survival assay. The rate of apoptosis and the cell cycle were evaluated using flow cytometry. An NPC xenograft model in NOD-SCID mice was used to evaluate the efficacy of the combination therapy of erlotinib with radiation. Erlotinib enhanced the sensitivity of the CNE1 and CNE2 cells to radiation, with sensitization enhancement ratios (SERs) of 1.076 and 1.109, respectively. Erlotinib combined with radiation induced G2/M phase cell cycle arrest in the two cell lines. The mouse tumor model demonstrated a significant reduction in NPC tumor volume in mice treated with erlotinib in combination with radiation when compared with that in mice treated with radiation alone. Erlotinib combined with radiation provoked G2-M phase cell cycle arrest, thereby enhancing the sensitivity of the NPC cells to radiation.Entities:
Keywords: erlotinib; nasopharyngeal carcinoma; radiation
Year: 2013 PMID: 24137317 PMCID: PMC3797307 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2013.1245
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Figure 1.Inhibitory effect of erlotinib on nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) cell lines. Cells were exposed for 72 h to increasing concentrations of erlotinib. Erlotinib inhibited proliferation of NPC CNE2 cells in vitro, as demonstrated by an MTS assay; however, this effect was not concentration-dependent. The data are presented as the mean ± standard error from three different experiments performed in triplicate.
Figure 2.Cell survival curve fitted using the single-hit multi-target model in the nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) cell line. CNE1 and CNE2 cells were exposed to increasing doses of radiation in the presence or absence of erlotinib. The figures show cell survival fitted using the click multiple target model. The data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean,.
Figure 3.Effects of erlotinib combined with ionizing radiation on apoptosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell lines. Histograms showing apoptosis in CNE1 and CNE2 cells that were treated with erlotinib (150 mmol/l) and/or ionizing radiation (Gy) for 24 or 48 h. The experiments were repeated three times and the values are the mean ± standard error of the mean.
Figure 4.Effects of erlotinib and ionizing radiation on cell cycle arrest in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) cell lines. Histograms showing the effects of erlotinib (150 mmol/l) and/or ionizing radiation (Gy) in (A and B) CNE1 and (C and D) CNE2 cells at 24 (A and C) and 48 (B and D) h. The experiments were repeated three times and the results are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean.
Figure 5.In vivo effect of erlotinib ± radiation on tumor volume in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) xenografts: Changes in tumor volume in NOD-SCID mice that were subcutaneously injected with 5×105 CNE2 cells and treated with erlotinib (1.6 mg/day) alone, radiation (8 Gy) alone or erlotinib plus radiation. Control animals received vehicle alone. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean.