| Literature DB >> 24137141 |
Sandrine Vieillard1, Anne-Laure Gilet.
Abstract
There is mounting evidence that aging is associated with the maintenance of positive affect and the decrease of negative affect to ensure emotion regulation goals. Previous empirical studies have primarily focused on a visual or autobiographical form of emotion communication. To date, little investigation has been done on musical emotions. The few studies that have addressed aging and emotions in music were mainly interested in emotion recognition, thus leaving unexplored the question of how aging may influence emotional responses to and memory for emotions conveyed by music. In the present study, eighteen older (60-84 years) and eighteen younger (19-24 years) listeners were asked to evaluate the strength of their experienced emotion on happy, peaceful, sad, and scary musical excerpts (Vieillard et al., 2008) while facial muscle activity was recorded. Participants then performed an incidental recognition task followed by a task in which they judged to what extent they experienced happiness, peacefulness, sadness, and fear when listening to music. Compared to younger adults, older adults (a) reported a stronger emotional reactivity for happiness than other emotion categories, (b) showed an increased zygomatic activity for scary stimuli, (c) were more likely to falsely recognize happy music, and (d) showed a decrease in their responsiveness to sad and scary music. These results are in line with previous findings and extend them to emotion experience and memory recognition, corroborating the view of age-related changes in emotional responses to music in a positive direction away from negativity.Entities:
Keywords: aging; emotional responses; facial muscle activity; incidental recognition; musical emotions; positivity effect
Year: 2013 PMID: 24137141 PMCID: PMC3797547 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00711
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Sample characteristics.
| Age (year) | 19–24 | 61–74 |
| Sex | 61% Women | 83% Women |
| Education (year)* | 15 (3.17) | 13 (1.57) |
| Musical training (proportion) | 0.22 | 0 |
| Self reported health (Max. 5) | 4.44 (0.86) | 4.22 (0.79) |
| Advanced progessive matrices (Set 1, Max. 12)* | 10.00 (1.91) | 7.78 (2.71) |
| Letter-number sequencing (Max. 21) | 11.89 (3.05) | 10.17 (2.23) |
| MMSE (Max. 30) | – | 29.7 |
| Depression (BDI-II, Max 63) | 8.33 (6.79) | 8.67 (5.30) |
| State Anxiety (STAI-Y-A, Max 80) | 30.55 (6.35) | 27.83 (6.72) |
| Trait Anxiety (STAI-Y-B, Max 80) | 40.83 (10.26) | 40.17 (9.57) |
Standard deviations are listed in parentheses. *Significant difference at p < 0.05.
Figure 1Mean score and standard error of emotion intensity felt, zygomatic and corrugator muscle activity as a function of intended emotions (happiness, peacefulness, sadness, fear) and age group (younger adults, older adults).
Hit rates, False Alarms Rates (FA) and Corrected Recognition (CR) by Emotions Catagory and Group Age.
| Hits | FA | CR | Hits | FA | CR | Hits | FA | CR | Hits | FA | CR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.64 | 0.12 | 0.52 | 0.70 | 0.31 | 0.39 | 0.70 | 0.32 | 0.38 | 0.64 | 0.03 | 0.61 | |
| 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.07 | |
| 0.74 | 0.56 | 0.18 | 0.66 | 0.56 | 0.10 | 0.63 | 0.50 | 0.13 | 0.46 | 0.07 | 0.39 | |
| 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.07 | |
Mean percentage of the label that received the maximal rating of Emotion Felt by younger and older listeners as a function of the Intended Emotions.
| Happiness | 5 | 2 | 1 | 11 | |
| Peacefulness | 13 | 28 | 1 | 21 | |
| Sadness | 1 | 20 | 10 | 13 | |
| Fear | 10 | 2 | 9 | 7 | |
| Happiness | 1 | 1 | 1 | 24 | |
| Peacefulness | 5 | 22 | 7 | 29 | |
| Sadness | 3 | 24 | 6 | 32 | |
| Fear | 9 | 4 | 28 | 25 | |
Bold indicates the match between Emotion Felt and Intended Emotions. Ambivalent responses correspond to highest ratings given to more than one label.