Literature DB >> 24137065

Kinematic changes during a marathon for fast and slow runners.

Maggie Chan-Roper1, Iain Hunter, Joseph W Myrer, Dennis L Eggett, Matthew K Seeley.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to describe kinematic changes that occur during an actual marathon. We hypothesized that (1) certain running kinematic measures would change between kilometres 8 and 40 (miles 5 and 25) of a marathon and (2) fast runners would demonstrate smaller changes than slow runners. Subjects (n = 179) were selected according to finish time (Range = 2:20:47 to 5:30:10). Two high-speed cameras were used to measure sagittal-plane kinematics at kilometres 8 and 40 of the marathon. The dependent variables were stride length, contact time, peak knee flexion during support and swing, and peak hip flexion and extension during swing. Two-tailed paired t-tests were used to compare dependent variables between kilometres 8 and 40 for all subjects, and regression analyses were used to determine whether faster runners exhibited smaller changes (between miles 5 and 25) than slower runners. For all runners, every dependent variable changed significantly between kilometres 8 and 40 (p < 0.001). Stride length increased 1.3%, contact time increased 13.1%, peak knee flexion during support decreased 3.2%, and peak hip extension, knee flexion, and hip flexion during swing decreased 27.9%, increased 4.3%, and increased 7.4%, respectively (p < 0.001). Among these significant changes, all runners generally changed the same from kilometres 8 and 40 except that fast runners decreased peak knee flexion during support less than the slow runners (p < 0.002). We believe that these changes, for all runners (fast and slow), were due to fatigue. The fact that fast runners maintained knee flexion during support more consistently might be due to their condition on the race day. Strengthening of knee extensor muscles may facilitate increased knee flexion during support throughout a marathon. KEY POINTS: Runners changed kinematics significantly from kilometres 8 to 40 (increased stride length, contact time, peak hip flexion during swing, and peak knee flexion during swing, and decreased running speed, stride frequency, peak knee flexion during support and peak hip extension during swing).Fast runners demonstrated more peak knee flexion during support throughout a marathon.Runners generally changed kinematics similarly (between kilometres 8 and 40) except that fast runners exhibited a more consistent peak knee flexion during support than slow runners.Resistance training that would increase both muscular strength and endurance of knee extensors may increase peak knee flexion during support and help maintain it similar to the fast runners throughout a marathon.

Keywords:  Fatigue; biomechanics; endurance; race; run

Year:  2012        PMID: 24137065      PMCID: PMC3737836     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  18 in total

1.  Impacts and kinematic adjustments during an exhaustive run.

Authors:  Timothy R Derrick; Darrin Dereu; Scott P McLean
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Effects of marathon running on running economy and kinematics.

Authors:  H Kyröläinen; T Pullinen; R Candau; J Avela; P Huttunen; P V Komi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Relationship between shock attenuation and stride length during running at different velocities.

Authors:  John A Mercer; Jason Vance; Alan Hreljac; Joseph Hamill
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2002-06-14       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  The mechanics of running: how does stiffness couple with speed?

Authors:  T A McMahon; G C Cheng
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  A comparison of sprinting kinematics on two types of treadmill and over-ground.

Authors:  M McKenna; P E Riches
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 4.221

6.  Preferred and optimal stride frequency, stiffness and economy: changes with fatigue during a 1-h high-intensity run.

Authors:  Iain Hunter; Gerald A Smith
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Running pattern changes depending on the level of subjects' awareness of the measurements performed: a "sampling effect" in human locomotion experiments?

Authors:  Jean-Benoît Morin; Pierre Samozino; Nicolas Peyrot
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 2.840

8.  Relationships between running mechanics and energy cost of running at the end of a triathlon and a marathon.

Authors:  C Hausswirth; A X Bigard; C Y Guezennec
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.118

9.  Jogging kinematics after lumbar paraspinal muscle fatigue.

Authors:  Joseph M Hart; D Casey Kerrigan; Julie M Fritz; Christopher D Ingersoll
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  The effect of stride length variation on oxygen uptake during distance running.

Authors:  P R Cavanagh; K R Williams
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  8 in total

1.  Changes in segment coordination variability and the impacts of the lower limb across running mileages in half marathons: Implications for running injuries.

Authors:  Tony Lin-Wei Chen; Duo Wai-Chi Wong; Yan Wang; Qitao Tan; Wing-Kai Lam; Ming Zhang
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 7.179

2.  Wearables for Running Gait Analysis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rachel Mason; Liam T Pearson; Gillian Barry; Fraser Young; Oisin Lennon; Alan Godfrey; Samuel Stuart
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 11.928

3.  Foot Pronation Contributes to Altered Lower Extremity Loading After Long Distance Running.

Authors:  Qichang Mei; Yaodong Gu; Liangliang Xiang; Julien S Baker; Justin Fernandez
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Kinematic alterations after two high-intensity intermittent training protocols in endurance runners.

Authors:  Felipe García-Pinillos; Alejandro Molina-Molina; Juan A Párraga-Montilla; Pedro A Latorre-Román
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 7.179

5.  Relationship between early-onset muscle soreness and indirect muscle damage markers and their dynamics after a full marathon.

Authors:  Katsuyuki Tokinoya; Keisuke Ishikura; Song-Gyu Ra; Kei Ebina; Shumpei Miyakawa; Hajime Ohmori
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.103

6.  Men's and Women's World Championship Marathon Performances and Changes With Fatigue Are Not Explained by Kinematic Differences Between Footstrike Patterns.

Authors:  Brian Hanley; Athanassios Bissas; Stéphane Merlino
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2020-08-06

7.  High tibial osteotomy solely for the purpose of return to lifelong sporting activities among elderly patients: A case series study.

Authors:  Ryuichi Nakamura; Masaki Takahashi; Tomoyuki Shimakawa; Kazunari Kuroda; Yasuo Katsuki; Akira Okano
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2019-11-24

8.  Effect of custom-made and prefabricated foot orthoses on kinematic parameters during an intense prolonged run.

Authors:  Marina Gil-Calvo; Irene Jimenez-Perez; Jose Ignacio Priego-Quesada; Ángel G Lucas-Cuevas; Pedro Pérez-Soriano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.