BACKGROUND: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a frequent complication of modern wartime extremity injuries. The biological mechanisms responsible for the development of HO in traumatic wounds remain elusive. QUESTION/PURPOSES: The aims of our study were to (1) characterize the expression profile of osteogenesis-related gene transcripts in traumatic war wounds in which HO developed; and (2) determine whether expression at the mRNA level correlated with functional protein expression and HO formation. METHODS: Biopsy specimens from 54 high-energy penetrating extremity wounds obtained at the initial and final surgical débridements were evaluated. The levels of selected osteogenic-related gene transcripts from RNA extracts were assessed by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis. As a result of its key role in osteogenesis, the concentration of BMP-2 in the effluent of 29 wounds also was determined. RESULTS: The transcripts of 13 genes (ALPL [p = 0.006], BMP-2 [p < 0.001], BMP-3 [p = 0.06], COL2A1 [p < 0.001], COLL10A1 [p < 0.001], COL11A1 [p = 0.006], COMP [p = 0.02], CSF2 [p = 0.003], CSF3 [p = 0.012], MMP8 [p < 0.001], MMP9 [p = 0.014], SMAD1 [p = 0.024], and VEGFA [p = 0.017]) were upregulated greater than twofold in wounds in which HO developed compared with wounds in which it did not develop. Gene transcript expression of BMP-2 also correlated directly with functional protein expression in the wounds that formed HO (p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Important differences exist in the osteogenic gene expression profile of wounds in which HO developed compared with wounds in which it did not develop. The upregulation of multiple osteogenesis-related gene transcripts indicates the presence of a proosteogenic environment necessary for ectopic bone formation in traumatic wounds. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Understanding the osteogenic environment associated with war wounds may allow for the development of novel therapeutic strategies for HO.
BACKGROUND: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a frequent complication of modern wartime extremity injuries. The biological mechanisms responsible for the development of HO in traumatic wounds remain elusive. QUESTION/PURPOSES: The aims of our study were to (1) characterize the expression profile of osteogenesis-related gene transcripts in traumatic war wounds in which HO developed; and (2) determine whether expression at the mRNA level correlated with functional protein expression and HO formation. METHODS: Biopsy specimens from 54 high-energy penetrating extremity wounds obtained at the initial and final surgical débridements were evaluated. The levels of selected osteogenic-related gene transcripts from RNA extracts were assessed by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis. As a result of its key role in osteogenesis, the concentration of BMP-2 in the effluent of 29 wounds also was determined. RESULTS: The transcripts of 13 genes (ALPL [p = 0.006], BMP-2 [p < 0.001], BMP-3 [p = 0.06], COL2A1 [p < 0.001], COLL10A1 [p < 0.001], COL11A1 [p = 0.006], COMP [p = 0.02], CSF2 [p = 0.003], CSF3 [p = 0.012], MMP8 [p < 0.001], MMP9 [p = 0.014], SMAD1 [p = 0.024], and VEGFA [p = 0.017]) were upregulated greater than twofold in wounds in which HO developed compared with wounds in which it did not develop. Gene transcript expression of BMP-2 also correlated directly with functional protein expression in the wounds that formed HO (p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Important differences exist in the osteogenic gene expression profile of wounds in which HO developed compared with wounds in which it did not develop. The upregulation of multiple osteogenesis-related gene transcripts indicates the presence of a proosteogenic environment necessary for ectopic bone formation in traumatic wounds. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Understanding the osteogenic environment associated with war wounds may allow for the development of novel therapeutic strategies for HO.
Authors: Pieter J Emans; Frank Spaapen; Don A M Surtel; Keryn M Reilly; Andy Cremers; Lodewijk W van Rhijn; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Jan Willem Voncken; Roel Kuijer Journal: Bone Date: 2006-09-18 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Elizabeth Olmsted-Davis; Francis H Gannon; Mustafa Ozen; Michael M Ittmann; Zbigniew Gugala; John A Hipp; Kevin M Moran; Christine M Fouletier-Dilling; Shannon Schumara-Martin; Ronald W Lindsey; Michael H Heggeness; Malcolm K Brenner; Alan R Davis Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Benjamin K Potter; Travis C Burns; Anton P Lacap; Robert R Granville; Donald A Gajewski Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Shailesh Agarwal; Shawn J Loder; Cameron Brownley; Oluwatobi Eboda; Jonathan R Peterson; Satoru Hayano; Bingrou Wu; Bin Zhao; Vesa Kaartinen; Victor C Wong; Yuji Mishina; Benjamin Levi Journal: Dev Biol Date: 2015-02-23 Impact factor: 3.582
Authors: Elena Gallo MacFarlane; Julia Haupt; Harry C Dietz; Eileen M Shore Journal: Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 10.005
Authors: Gabriel J Pavey; Ammar T Qureshi; Donald N Hope; Rebecca L Pavlicek; Benjamin K Potter; Jonathan A Forsberg; Thomas A Davis Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Ammar T Qureshi; Erica K Crump; Gabriel J Pavey; Donald N Hope; Jonathan A Forsberg; Thomas A Davis Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Chen Kan; Lijun Chen; Yangyang Hu; Na Ding; Haimei Lu; Yuyun Li; John A Kessler; Lixin Kan Journal: Bone Date: 2017-04-25 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Elizabeth C Martin; Ammar T Qureshi; Claire B Llamas; Elaine C Boos; Andrew G King; Peter C Krause; Olivia C Lee; Vinod Dasa; Michael A Freitas; Jonathan A Forsberg; Eric A Elster; Thomas A Davis; J M Gimble Journal: J Cell Physiol Date: 2018-04-10 Impact factor: 6.384
Authors: Kahtonna C Allen; Carlos J Sanchez; Krista L Niece; Joseph C Wenke; Kevin S Akers Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2015-08-31 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Jonathan A Forsberg; Benjamin K Potter; Elizabeth M Polfer; Shawn D Safford; Eric A Elster Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2014-05-31 Impact factor: 4.176