Literature DB >> 24136783

Semiautomatic registration of digital histopathology images to in vivo MR images in molded and unmolded prostates.

Olga Starobinets1, Richard Guo, Jeffry P Simko, Kyle Kuchinsky, John Kurhanewicz, Peter R Carroll, Kirsten L Greene, Susan M Noworolski.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate a semiautomatic software-based method of registering in vivo prostate MR images to digital histopathology images using two approaches: (i) in which the prostates were molded to simulate distortion due to the endorectal imaging coil before fixation, and (ii) in which the prostates were not molded.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: T2-weighted MR images and digitized whole-mount histopathology images were acquired for 26 patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy. Ten excised prostates were molded before fixation. A semiautomatic method was used to align MR images to histopathology. Percent overlap between MR and histopathology images, as well as distances between corresponding anatomical landmarks were calculated and used to evaluate the registration technique for molded and unmolded cases.
RESULTS: The software successfully morphed histology-based prostate images into corresponding MR images. Percent overlap improved from 80.4 ± 5.8% before morphing to 99.7 ± 0.62% post morphing. Molded prostates had a smaller distance between landmarks (1.91 ± 0.75 mm) versus unmolded (2.34 ± 0.68 mm), P < 0.08.
CONCLUSION: Molding a prostate before fixation provided a better alignment of internal structures within the prostate, but this did not reach statistical significance. Software-based morphing allowed for nearly complete overlap between the pathology slides and the MR images.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; histopathology; prostate cancer; registration

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24136783      PMCID: PMC3984354          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  25 in total

Review 1.  Prostate cancer early detection: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  G D Grossfeld; P R Carroll
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Semi-automatic deformable registration of prostate MR images to pathological slices.

Authors:  Yousef Mazaheri; Louisa Bokacheva; Dirk-Jan Kroon; Oguz Akin; Hedvig Hricak; Daniel Chamudot; Samson Fine; Jason A Koutcher
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  A method for correlating in vivo prostate magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology using individualized magnetic resonance-based molds.

Authors:  Vijay Shah; Thomas Pohida; Baris Turkbey; Haresh Mani; Maria Merino; Peter A Pinto; Peter Choyke; Marcelino Bernardo
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.523

4.  Elastic registration of multimodal prostate MRI and histology via multiattribute combined mutual information.

Authors:  Jonathan Chappelow; B Nicolas Bloch; Neil Rofsky; Elizabeth Genega; Robert Lenkinski; William DeWolf; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Use of patient-specific MRI-based prostate mold for validation of multiparametric MRI in localization of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hari Trivedi; Baris Turkbey; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Compton J Benjamin; Marcelino Bernardo; Thomas Pohida; Vijay Shah; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; W Marston Linehan; Aradhana M Venkatesan; Peter L Choyke; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Using manual prostate contours to enhance deformable registration of endorectal MRI.

Authors:  M R Cheung; K Krishnan
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Carcinoma of the prostate gland: MR imaging with pelvic phased-array coils versus integrated endorectal--pelvic phased-array coils.

Authors:  H Hricak; S White; D Vigneron; J Kurhanewicz; A Kosco; D Levin; J Weiss; P Narayan; P R Carroll
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: present and future.

Authors:  John Kurhanewicz; Daniel Vigneron; Peter Carroll; Fergus Coakley
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.309

9.  Expandable and rigid endorectal coils for prostate MRI: impact on prostate distortion and rigid image registration.

Authors:  Yongbok Kim; I-Chow J Hsu; Jean Pouliot; Susan Moyher Noworolski; Daniel B Vigneron; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Local staging of prostate cancer with endorectal MR imaging: correlation with histopathology.

Authors:  G J Jager; E T Ruijter; C A van de Kaa; J J de la Rosette; G O Oosterhof; J R Thornbury; J O Barentsz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  2 in total

1.  Role of endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging in defining treatable intraprostatic tumor foci in prostate cancer: quantitative analysis of imaging contour compared to whole-mount histopathology.

Authors:  Mekhail Anwar; Antonio C Westphalen; Adam J Jung; Susan M Noworolski; Jeffry P Simko; John Kurhanewicz; Mack Roach; Peter R Carroll; Fergus V Coakley
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 2.  Accurate validation of ultrasound imaging of prostate cancer: a review of challenges in registration of imaging and histopathology.

Authors:  Rogier R Wildeboer; Ruud J G van Sloun; Arnoud W Postema; Christophe K Mannaerts; Maudy Gayet; Harrie P Beerlage; Hessel Wijkstra; Massimo Mischi
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2018-07-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.